Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:16:17.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive biology of Eulalia viridis (Müller) (Polychaeta: Phyllodocidae) in the north eastern U.K.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. J. W. Olive
P. J. W. Olive
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory and Department of Zoology, The University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eulalia viridis is the most common littoral phyllodocid at Cullercoats Bay, where it occupies crevices and small holes in the well-sutured sandstone and limestone rocks. It is particularly common in rocks having a heavy encrustation of barnacles. The reproductive biology of this species in particular, and of phyllodocids in general, is poorly known. Meyer (1938) has described the development of larvae of Eulalia viridis both from artificial fertilizations and from egg cocoons said to belong to Eulalia viridis collected in January at Plymouth, U.K. The observations made during the present investigation differ in a number of important respects from those of Meyer and his conclusions cannot be considered appropriate to all populations of E. viridis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , May 1975 , pp. 313 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brafield, A. E. & Chapman, G., 1967. Gametogenesis and breeding in a natural population of Nereis virens. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 47, 519–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. B. & Olive, P. J. W., 1973. Recent advances in polychaete endocrinology and reproductive biology. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 11, 175–222.Google Scholar
Daly, J. M., 1972. The maturation and breeding biology of Harmothoe imbricata (Polychaeta: Polynoidae). Marine Biology 12, 53–66.Google Scholar
Daly, J. M., 1975. Reversible epitoky in the life history of the polychaete Ondontosyllis polycera (Schmarda 1861). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 327–44.Google Scholar
Daro, M. H. & Polk, P., 1973. The autecology of Polydora ciliata along the Belgian coast. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 6, 130–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzen, A., 1956. On spermiogenesis, morphology of the spermatozoan and biology of fertilisation among invertebrates. Zoologiska bidragfrdn Uppsala, 31, 355–482.Google Scholar
George, J. D., 1964. The life history of the cirratulid worm Cirriformia tentaculata on an inter-tidal mud flat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 44, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, P. E., 1968. Observations on the population of Scoloplos armiger at Whitstable. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, E. S., 1945. The study of nephridia and genital ducts since 1895. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 83, 113–392.Google Scholar
Gravier, C, 1896. Recherches sur les phyllodociens. Bulletin scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 29, 293–383.Google Scholar
Hauenschild, C., 1974. Endocrine Beeinflussung der geschlectlichen Entwicklung einiger Polychaten. Fortschritte der Zoologie, 22, 75–92.Google Scholar
Hofmann, D. K., 1974. Maturation, epitoky and regeneration in the polychaete Eunice siciliensis under field and laboratory conditions. Marine Biology, 25, 149–161.Google Scholar
Hutchings, P. A., 1973. Age structure and spawning of a Northumberland population of Melinna cristata (Polychaeta: Ampharetidae). Marine Biology, 18, 218–27.Google Scholar
MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna, 3rd ed., xliii, 457 pp. Plymouth.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C, 1908. A monograph of the British Annelids. Polychaeta: Nephthydidae to Syllidae, 2 (1), pp. 232. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Meyer, A., 1938. Der Rogen und die Entwicklung der trochophora von Eulalia viridis. Biologia generalis, 14, 334–89.Google Scholar
Muus, B. J., 1967. The fauna of the Danish estuaries and lagoons. Distribution and ecology of dominating species in the shallow reaches of the mesohaline zone. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havundersogelser, 5, 3–317.Google Scholar
Nolte, W., 1938. Anneliden larven. Nordisches Plankton, 24, 171–282.Google Scholar
Olive, P. J. W., 1970. Reproduction of a Northumberland population of the polychaete Cirratulus cirratus. Marine Biology, 5, 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, P. J. W., 1974. Germinal epithelium activity in polychaetes in relation to periodicity of reproduction. Pubblicazioni della Stazione zoologica di Napoli. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Olive, P. J. W., 1975. Evidence of a vitellogenesis promoting influence from the prostonium of Eulalia viridis (Polychaeta: Phyllodocidae). General and Comparative Endocrinology. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Peer, D. L., 1970. Relation between biomass, productivity and loss to predators in a population of a marine benthic polychaete Pectinaria hyperborea. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 27, 2143–53.Google Scholar
Raven, C. P., 1961. Oogenesis: the storage of developmental information. 274 pp. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar