Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:49:39.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative importance of parental nutrition and population versus larval diet on development and phenotypic plasticity of Sclerasterias mollis larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Hadi Poorbagher ,
Miles D. Lamare  and
Mike F. Barker
Miles D. Lamare
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
Mike F. Barker
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relative importance of parental diet/population and larval diet were examined on egg, growth, morphology and biochemistry of Sclerasterias mollis larvae. Adult S. mollis were fed one cockle (Austrovenus stutchburyi) per two animals each week, as a low diet, or two cockles per animal each week, as a high diet. The experiment was run for one year. In addition, two field populations (Otago inshore and offshore) with dissimilar nutritional status (based on the gonad index) were selected. Otago inshore starfish had higher gonad indices and assumed to have better nutritional status. The low and high diet laboratory starfish produced eggs with similar characteristics. Eggs from the low diet laboratory parents had the highest carbohydrate concentration. The eggs from the field parents had higher fertilization rate and lower carbohydrate concentration than eggs from the laboratory parents. The Otago inshore starfish had smaller eggs with a lower carbohydrate concentration than the starfish from Otago offshore. Parents from the laboratory or the field had significant effects on larval growth, morphological phenotypic plasticity (measured by the body length relative to the body width) and development rate. Larvae from Otago offshore parents had highest growth and morphological phenotypic plasticity. Larvae from the low diet laboratory parents and those from Otago inshore had the highest development rate. Larvae from low diet laboratory parents had the highest carbohydrate concentration. Neither the parents nor the larval diet had a significant effect on larval mortality. A higher concentration planktonic diet resulted in higher growth, morphological phenotypic plasticity and development rate. Parents were however more important than larval diet on growth and phenotypic plasticity of the larvae. This study showed that parental nutrition has an important effect on growth, morphological phenotypic plasticity and body composition of S. mollis larvae. The nutritional status of the parents does not influence the larvae through a change in the egg size, protein, lipid, carbohydrate and energy content.

Keywords

egglarvaeparental nutritionparental populationstarfish
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 527 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, M.F. and Xu, R.A. (1991) Population differences in gonad and pyloric caeca cycles of the New Zealand seastar Sclerasterias mollis (Echinodermata: Asrteroidea). Marine Biology 108, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basch, L.V. (1996) Effects of algal and larval densities on development and survival of asteroid larvae. Marine Biology 126, 693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, D.F. and Strathmann, R. (1998) Effects of maternal and larval nutrition on growth and form of planktotrophy larvae. Ecology 79, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, S. (1945) Bioenergetics and growth. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Everitt, B.S. and Dunn, G. (1991) Applied multivariate data analysis. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
George, S.B. (1990) Population and seasonal difference in egg quality of Arbacia lixula (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 17, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S.B. (1994) Population differences in maternal size and offspring quality for Leptesterias epichlora (Brandt) (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 175, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S.B. (1996) Echinoderm egg and larval quality as a function of adult nutritional state. Oceanologica Acta 19, 297–308.Google Scholar
George, S.B. (1999) Egg quality, larval growth and phenotypic plasticity in a forcipulate seastar. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 237, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S.B., Cellario, C. and Fenaux, L. (1990) Population differences in egg quality of Arbacia lixula (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): proximate composition of eggs and larval development. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 141, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S.B., Lawrence, J.M. and Fenaux, L. (1991) The effect of food ration on the quality of eggs of Luidia clathrata (Say) (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 20, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S.B., Young, C.M. and Fenaux, L. (1997) Proximate composition of eggs and larvae of the sand dollar Encope michelini (Agassiz): the advantage of higher investment in planktotrophic eggs. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 32, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S.B., Fox, C. and Wakeham, S. (2008) Fatty acid composition of larvae of the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus (Echinodermata) might reflect FA composition of the diets. Aquaculture 285, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, M.W. and Strathmann, R.R. (1994) Functional consequences of phenotypic plasticity in echinoid larvae. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 186, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jong-Westman, M.D., Qian, P.-Y., March, B.E. and Carefoot, T.H. (1995) Artificial diets in sea urchin culture: effects of dietary protein level and other additives on egg quality, larval morphometrics, and larval survival in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 2080–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manahan, D.T. (1989) Amino acid fluxes to and from seawater in axenic veliger larvae of a bivalve (Crassostrea gigas). Marine Ecology Progress Series 53, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, R. and Gallager, S.M. (1985) Physiological and biochemical energetics of larvae of Teredo navalis L. and Bankia gouldi (Bartsch). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 85, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEdward, L.R. (1986a) Comparative morphometrics of echinoderm larvae. I. Some relationships between egg size and initial larval form in echinoids. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 96, 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEdward, L.R. (1986b) Comparative morphometrics of echinoderm larvae. II. Larval size, shape, growth, and the scaling of feeding and metabolism in echinoplutei. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 96, 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEdward, L.R. (1997) Reproductive strategies of marine benthic invertebrates revisited: facultative feeding by planktotrophic larvae. American Naturalist 150, 48–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meidel, S.K. and Scheibling, R.E. (1999) Effects of food type and ration on reproductive maturation and growth of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Marine Biology 134, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidel, S.K., Scheibling, R.E. and Metaxas, A. (1999) Relative importance of parental and larval nutrition on larval development and metamorphosis of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 240, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, A.L. and Manahan, D.T. (2004) Physiological recovery from prolonged ‘starvation’ in larvae of the Pacific oyster Crossostrea gigas. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 306, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S.G. (1995) Life and death in the plankton: larval mortality and adaptation. In McEdward, L.R. (ed.) Ecology of marine invertebrate larvae. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 279–321.Google Scholar
Norusis, M.J. (2008) SPSS 16.0 advanced statistical procedures companion. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Quinn, G.P. and Keough, M.J. (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, M., Seki, M., Amemiya, S., Yamasu, K., Suyemitsu, T. and Ishihara, K. (1998) Induction of metamorphosis in the sand dollar Peronella japonica by thyroid hormones. Development, Growth and Differentiation 40, 307–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiopu, D., George, S.B. and Castell, J. (2006) Ingestion rates and dietary lipids affect growth and fatty acid composition of Dendraster excentricus larvae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 328, 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathmann, M.F. (1987) Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific coast. Washington, DC: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Strathmann, R.R., Fenaux, L. and Strathmann, M.F. (1992) Heterochronic developmental plasticity in larval sea urchins and its implications for evolution of nonfeeding larvae. Evolution 46, 972–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R.J. (1982) The relationship between food ration and reproductive effort in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Oecologia 56, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsushima, M., Byrne, M., Amemiya, S. and Matsuno, T. (1995) Comparative biochemical studies of carotenoids in sea urchins—III. Relationship between developmental mode and carotenoids in the Australian echinoids Heliocidaris erythrogramma and H. tuberculata and a comparison with Japanese species. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 110, 719–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vance, R.R. (1973a) On reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates. American Naturalist 107, 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, R.R. (1973b) More on reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates. American Naturalist 107, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R.R. (2005) Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. 2nd edition.San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Xu, R.A. and Barker, M.F. (1990) Laboratory experiments on the effects of diet on the gonad and pyloric caeca indices and biochemical composition of tissues of the New Zealand starfish Sclerasterias mollis (Hutton) (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 136, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar