Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:35:23.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relation of Gammarus zaddachi Sexton to some other species of Gammarus occurring in fresh, estuarine and marine waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. W. Sexton
E. W. Sexton
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gammarus zaddachi is perhaps the most prolific and widespread of all the estuarine amphipods known to occur in northern Europe, and inhabiting, as it does, the low-salinity estuarine zone and adjacent coasts, it has come to be recognized in recent ecological work as a ‘salinity indicator’.

Unfortunately, there has been constant confusion with the other common species of Gammarus, G. locusta, pulex, and duebeni, which has been greatly complicated by the difference in the appearance of zaddachi according as it lives in a freshwater or a saline habitat. It is shown that this difference is entirely due to the sensory equipment, the greater production of hairs in freshwater conditions, and that the structure of the two ‘forms’ is identical.

The history of the species has been carried back as far as I have been able to trace it (1836) with the actual specimens, described in the different papers, and the more important of these papers are discussed. It will be seen that the material examined was derived from every country of northern Europe; from Russia, the White Sea, Crimea, and the Baltic, the coasts of Scandinavia, Germany, including the Hamburg water-supply, Denmark, the Netherlands, Great Britain and Ireland, and France as far up the Loire as Nantes.

Detailed descriptions and figures of both forms of G. zaddachi are given; and finally, a comparison is made between the species most commonly confused with it, the Arctic species G. wilkitzkii being included because of a suggestion recently made that it might be, not a distinct species, but merely the Arctic form of zaddachi.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , October 1942 , pp. 575 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassindale, R.J. 1933. Abnormal eyes in wild Gammarus zaddachi Sexton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 297–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassindale, R.J. 1941. The Invertebrate Fauna of the Southern Shores of the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. Proc. Bristol Nat. Soc., Ser. iv, Vol. IX, Amphipoda, pp. 167–75.Google Scholar
Bate, C.Spence, 1862. Catalogue of the Specimens of Amphipodous Crustacea in Collection of the British Museum, p. 206. London.Google Scholar
Bate, C.Spence, & Westwood, J. O., 1863. History of the British Sessile-eyed Crustacea, Vol. 1, pp. 378–83. London.Google Scholar
Brandt, F., 1851. Reise in den äussersten Norden und Osten Siberiens während der jahre 1843 und 1844. Bd. II, Krebse., pp. 132–5. St Petersburg.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1899. Révision des amphipodes de la côte océanique de France. C.R. Assoc. franç. Avancem. Sci., 27me Sess., pp. 474–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevreux, E. & De Guerne, J., 1892a. Sur une espèce nouvelle de Gammarus, du lac d'Annecy et sur les amphipodes d'eau douce de la France. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E. & De Guerne, J. 1892b. Description de Gammarus Delebecquei nov.sp. du lac d'Annecy, suivie de quelques remarques sur les Amphipodes d'eau douce de la France. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, T. XVII, pp. 136–42.Google Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1936. Additions to the Plymouth Marine Fauna (1931) in the Crustacean Orders Tanaidacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, G. I. 1937. The Fauna of Certain Estuaries in West England, and S. Wales with Special Reference to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Friedr, , 1893. Untersuchungen über die Thierwelt der Unterelbe. Sechster Berichtd. Komm. z. Wissenschaftl. Untersuchung. d. deutschen Meeres in Kiel 1891, Bd. III, pp. 151–85.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C., 1775. Systema Entomologiae. Flensburgi et Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Otto, 1780. Fauna Groenlandica. Hafniae et Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Gurjanova, Eupraxie, , 1930. Beiträge zur Fauna der Crustacea-Malacostraca des arktischen Gebietes. Zool. Anz., Bd. 86, pp. 231–48.Google Scholar
Gurjanova, Eupraxie, 1933. Contribution to the Fauna of Crustacea-Malacostraca of the Obj-Enisej Bay. Explor. de la Mer U.S.S.R., T. 18, pp. 75–90 (English summary).Google Scholar
Hellen, 1919. Zur Kenntnis der Amphipoden-Fauna Finnlands. Medd. Soc. Fauna Flora Fennica, Bd. 45.Google Scholar
Höfken, Ulrich, 1937. Statistische und experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Variabilität von Gammarus locusta (L.). Kieler Meeresforsch., Bd. II, pp. 116–48.Google Scholar
Hoek, P. P. C., 1889. Crustacea Neerlandica. Tijdsch. Neder. Dierk. Ver., Ser. 2, D. 11, pp. 170–234.Google Scholar
Klie, W. 1913. Die Crustaceen–Fauna des Alten Hafens zu Bremerhaven. Internat. Rev., Biol. Supp., Bd. VI (12 pages).Google Scholar
Kraepelin, Karl, , 1886. Die Fauna der Hamburger Wasserleitung. Abh. a. d. Geb. Naturwiss. Verein in Hamburg, Bd. IX, pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1745. Ölandska och Gothlandska resa. Stockholm och Upsala.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, 10th and later editions. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Milne, Edwards, H., 1830. Recherches pour servir à l'historie naturelle des Crustacées Amphipodes. Ann. Sci. Nat., T. XX, pp. 353–99.Google Scholar
Milne, Edwards, H. 1840. Histoire naturelle des crustacées comprenant l'anatomie, la physiologie, classification de ces animaux, T. III. Paris.Google Scholar
Möbius, , Karl, , 1873. Die wirbellosen Thiere der Ostsee. Jahresber. Comm. Wissenschaftl. Untersuch. d. deutschen Meeres in Kiel 1871. Translation, DALLAS, 187. On the invertebrate animals of the Baltic. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 4, Vol. XII, pp. 81–9.Google Scholar
Montagu, , George, , 1808. Description of several Marine Animals found on the South Coast of Devonshire. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Vol. IX, p. 92.Google Scholar
Oldevig, , Hugo, , 1933. Sveriges Amphipoder. Göteborgs Kung. Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhälles Handlingar. Femte Följden, Ser. B, Bd. 3, No. 4, pp. 197–9.Google Scholar
Palmer, , Richard, , 1933. Notes on Gammarus zaddachi Sexton from Essex with observations on Eye-variations in this species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. (10), Vol. XI, pp. 64–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, E., 1929. A Report on the Fauna of the Estuaries of the River Tamar and the River Lynher. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1932–1933. On a Collection of Gammarus from the waters South of Sealand (30. 5. 1932). Vidensk. Medd. Naturh. Foren. Kjob., Bd. 94, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Rathke, , Heinrich, , 1836. Zur Fauna der Krym. Mem. K. Akad. Wiss., Bd. III, pp. 82–4 (of original issue). St Petersburg.Google Scholar
Rathke, , Heinrich, 1843. Beiträge zur Fauna Norwegens. Verhandl. d. K. Leopold-Carol. Akad. d. Naturf., Bd. XX, pp. 67–8.Google Scholar
Riech, , Fritz, , 1926. Beiträge zur Kenntnis d. litoralen Lebensgemeinschaften in der poly- u. mesohaline Region d. Frischen Haffs. Schr. der Phys. ödkon. Ges. z. Königsberg i. Pr. Bd. LXV, pp. 32–47.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1890. Crustacea of Norway. I. Amphipoda. p. 499.Google Scholar
Schäferna, , Karel, , 1922. Amphipoda Balcanica. Sodetas scientiarum bohemica, T. II (with English summary, p. 96).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, A., 1934. Zur Amphipoden-Fauna der Kieler Bucht. Schr. d. Naturwiss. Ver. für Schleswig-Holstein, Bd. XX, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, A. 1937. Kritische Bemerkungen zur Systematik der Süsswassergammariden. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst., Bd. 69, pp. 469–516.Google Scholar
Schlienz, , Walter, , 1922. Systematische Bemerkungen zu den Gammarus-Arten aus Nord-deutschen Flussgeschwellen. Zool. Anz., Bd. LIV, pp. 215–17.Google Scholar
Schlienz, , Walter, 1923. Verbreitung und Verbreitungsbedingungen der höheren Krebse in Miindungsgebiet der Elbe. Arch. Hydrobiol., Bd. 14, pp. 429–52.Google Scholar
Serventy, D. L., 1934. The Marine Invertebrate Fauna, in Scolt Head Island. Cambridge, pp. 196–213.Google Scholar
Serventy, D. L. 1935. Observations on Gammarus zaddachi Sexton, an Estuarine Amphipod and Associated Forms. Internat. Rev., Bd. 32, pp. 285–94.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1912. Some brackish–water Amphipoda from the mouths of the Weser and the Elbe, and from the Baltic. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 656–65.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W. 1913. On a Collection of Gammarus from the Königsberg Museum. Schr. der Phys.-ökon. Ges. z. Königsberg i. Pr., Bd. LIV, pp. 90–4.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W. 1924. The moulting and growth stages of Gammarus with descriptions of the normals and intersexes of G. chevreuxi. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIII, pp. 340–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, E. W. 1928. On the Rearing and Breeding of Gammarus in Laboratory Conditions. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XV, pp. 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, E. W. & Spooner, G. M., 1940. An account of Marinogammarus (Schellenberg) gen.nov. [Amphipoda] with a description of a new species M. Pirloti. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV, pp. 633–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephensen, K. 1916. Zoogeographical Investigation of certain fjords in Southern Greenland with special reference to Crustacea, Pycnogonida, and Echinodermata. Medd. om Grønland, Bd. LIII, pp. 236–7.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. 1917. On a Collection of Gammarus from Randers Fjord Denmark. Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk Naturh. Foren., Bd. 68, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. 1927. Revideret Fortegnelse over Danmarks arter af Amphipoda (3. Del Gammaridea. Fam. Gammaridae tel Fam. Podoceridae (Dulichiidae aut) Caprellidea). Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk Naturh. Foren., Bd. 84, pp. 115–20.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. 1928. Danmarks Fauna. Storkrebs. II. Ringkrebs. I. Tanglopper (Amphipoder). pp. 275–8. København.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. 1929. Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee. Lief, XIV, Teil xf. (Amphipoda). pp. 138–9.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. & Ussing, H. J., 1918. Krebsdyrene i Randers Fjord. In Randers Fjord Naturhistorie, kap. V.E., pp. 335–8. København.Google Scholar
Szidat, , Lothar, , 1926. Beiträge zur Faunistik und Biologie des Kurischen Haffs. Schr. der Phys.-ökon. Ges. z. Königsberg i. Pr., Bd. 65, pp. 5–31.Google Scholar
Tesch, J. J., 1915. Die Amphipoden der zuidelijke Noordzee verzameld met de ‘Wodan’. Rapp. Rijksinst. Vissch. underzoek, D. I, pp. 336–9.Google Scholar
Tesch, J. J. 1922. Amphipoden: in Flora en Fauna der Zuiderzee, pp. 326–36. Helder.Google Scholar
Vanhöffen, E., 1911. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Brackwasserfauna im Frischen Haff. Sitz. Ber. d. Ges. Naturf. Freunde, pp. 399–405.Google Scholar
Vanhöffen, E., 1917. Die niedere Tierwelt des Frischen Haffs. Sitz. Ber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde, pp. 113–47.Google Scholar
Volk, , Richard, , 1907. Mitteilungen über die biologische Elbe-Untersuchung des Naturhistorischen Museums in Hamburg. Verhandl. d. Naturw. Ver. in Hamburg, Bd. 3, XV, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Walker, A. O., 1911. On Gammarus campylops Leach. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. (8), Vol. 7, pp. 397–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaddach, E. G., 1844. Synopseos Crustaceorum Prussicorum Prodromus. pp. 4–6. Regiomonti.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaddach, E. G., 1878. Die Meeres-Fauna an der preussischen Küste. Schr. der Phys.-ökon. Ges. z. Königsberg i. Pr, 19. Jahrg., pp. 26–32.Google Scholar