Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T09:48:29.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-investigation of Polyoeca dichotoma and Acanthoeca spectabilis (Acanthoecidae: Choanoflagellida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Shigemitsu Hara
Affiliation:
Department of Nature of the Earth, Division of Environmental Science, The Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University
Eiji Takahashif
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657, Japan To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Light and electron microscopical reinvestigation of Polyoeca dichotoma Kent revealed that Acanthoecopsis spiculifera Norris, the type species of the genus, is a synonym for Polyoeca dichotoma. Since this step invalidates the use of the name Acanthoecopsis, a new genus Acanthocorbis was established for the three species formerly included in Acanthoecopsis.

The three dimensional arrangement of costal strips forming the loricae of Polyoeca dichotoma and Acanthoeca spectabilis Ellis were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The arrangement of costal strips were similar in both species. The longitudinal costal strips and those forming the spines were arranged outside the supplementary costae and those of the transverse bonds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boucaud-Camou, E., 1967. Les choanoflagellés des Côtes de la Manche. I. Systématique. Bulletin de la Societe linneenne de Normandie, 10, 191209.Google Scholar
Dunkerly, J. S., 1910. Notes on the choanoflagellate genera Salpingoeca and Polyoeca, with description of Polyoeca dumosa, sp.n. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5, 186191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, W. S., 18801882. A Manual of the Infusoria, vol. 1. 472 pp. London.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C., 1972. Fine-structural observations on some marine choanoflagellates from the coast of Norway. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 6779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C., 1979. Developmental and ultrastructural observations on two stalked marine choanoflagellates, Acanthoecopsis spicurifera Norris and Acanthoeca spectabilis Ellis. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 204, 5766.Google ScholarPubMed
Leadbeater, B. S. C. & Morton, C., 1974. A light and electron microscope study of the choanoflagellates Acanthoeca spectabilis Ellis and A. brevipoda Ellis. Archives of Microbiology, 95, 279292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. E., 1965. Neustonic marine Craspedomonadales (choanoflagellates) from Washington and California. Journal of Protozoology, 12, 589602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, H. A., 1973. Studies on marine choanoflagellates. I. Silicified choanoflagellates of the Isefjord (Denmark). Ophelia, 12, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, H. A., 1976. Studies on marine choanoflagellates. II. Fine-structural observations on some silicified choanoflagellates from Isefjord (Denmark), including the description of two new species. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 23, 3351.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H. A., 1977. Studies on marine choanoflagellates. III. An electron microscopical survey of the genus Acanthoecopsis. Archiv fur Protistenkunde, 119, 8699.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H. A., 1979. Electron microscopical observations on brackish-water nannoplankton from the Tvarminne area, SW coast of Finland. Acta botanica fennica, 110, 1137.Google Scholar