Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:43:03.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redescription of Nephtys Assimilis and N. Kersivalensis (Polychaeta: Phyllodocida) and a Key to Nephtys from Northern Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

S.F. Rainer
S.F. Rainer
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Fisheries, Marine Laboratories, PO Box 20, North Beach, Western Australia 6020, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Descriptions of the polychaete Nephtys hombergii Savigny, 1818 have encompassed a wide range of apparently intraspecific variation in taxonomic features such as the segment on which interramal cirri first occur, and the form and size of pre- and postsetal lamellae (Fauchald, 1963; Woolf, 1968; Hartmann-Schröder, 1971). During the examination of museum collections and of extensive ecological collections from the North Sea (Rainer, 1990) and from Danish waters, it was found that the name N. hombergii has been applied to three morphologically similar species, viz. N. hombergii (s.s.), N. assimilis Örsted and N. kersivalensis Mclntosh. Both are locally abundant species that may occur with N. hombergii. This paper designates a neotype of N. assimilis, provides a full description of N. assimilis and N. kersivalensis, and removes these species from synonymy with N. hombergii.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , November 1989 , pp. 875 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Augener, H., 1912. Beitrag zur Kenntnis verschiedener Anneliden und Bemerkungen über die nordischen Nephthys-arten und deren epitoke Formen. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 78A (10), 162–212.Google Scholar
Fage, L. & Legendre, R., 1927. Peches planctoniques à la Iumiére effectuées à Banyuls-sur-Mer et à Concarneau. I. Annélides polychètes. Archives de Zoologie Expérimental et Génerate, 67, 23–222.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K., 1963. Nephtyidae (Polychaeta) from Norwegian waters. Sarsia, 13, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1923. Polychètes errantes. Faune de France, 5, 488 pp.Google Scholar
George, J.D., 1979. The polychaetes of Lewis and Harris with notes on other marine invertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (B), 77, 189–216.Google Scholar
Hartman, O., 1940. Chrysopetalidae to Goniadidae. Allan Hancock Pacific Expedition, 7, 173–287.Google Scholar
Hartman, O., 1959. Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world. Part I. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation, no. 23, 353 pp.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1971. Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile, 58, 594 pp.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1974. Polychaeten von Expeditionen der “Anton Dohrn” in Nordsee und Skagerrak. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts fur Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, 14, 169–274.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1977. Polychaeten aus dem Sublitoral und Bathyal vor der portugiesis-chen und marokkanischen Küste. - Auswertung der Fahrt 8 (1967) von F.S. “Meteor”. “Meteor” Forschungsergebnisse (Reihe D), no. 26, 65–99.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1981. Die Polychaeten der Fahrten 11,19,21 und 26 (1967 - 1972) von F.S. “Meteor” in das Gebiet zwischen dem Golf von Biscaya und dem Auftriebsgebiet vor Westafrika. “Meteor” Forschungsergebnisse (Reihe D), no. 33, 23–36.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1982. Die Polychaeten der Fahrt 36 (1975) von F.S. “Meteor” in das Auftriebsgebiet vor Nordwest-Africa. “Meteor” Forschungsergebnisse (Reihe D), no. 35, 1–20.Google Scholar
Heinen, A., 1911. Die Nephthyideen und Lycorideen der Nord- und Ostsee, einschlieβlich der verbindenden Meeresteile. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen (Abteilung Kiel), 13, 1–87.Google Scholar
Kirkegaard, J.B., 1969. A quantitative investigation of the central North Sea Polychaeta. Spolia Zoologica Musei Hauniensis, 29, 285 pp.Google Scholar
Laborda, A.J., 1987. Estudio con el SEM (scanning electron mycroscopy) de tres especies del genero Nephtys. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 28, 131–146.Google Scholar
Laborda, A.J. & Viéitez, J.M., 1984. Anélidos poliquetos intermareales endémicos de Galicia (con la descriptión de una nueva especie del género Nephthys). Cuardernos Marisqueros, Publicacion Técnica de la Consellaria de Agricultura, Pesca e Alimentacion, Xunta de Galicia, no. 7, 207–221.Google Scholar
Mclntosh, W.C. 1908. A Monograph of the British Annelids, vol. 2. Part 1. Polychaeta. Nephthydidae to Syllidae. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Malm, A.W., 1874. Annulater i hafvet utmed Sverges vestkust och omkring Göteborg. Goteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vittenhets Samhälles Handlingar, 14, 67–105.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A.J., 1865. Nordiska Hafs-Annulater. Forhandlingar Öfversigt af Kungliga VetenskapsAkademiens Stockholm, 21, 51–110.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A.J., 1867. Annulata Polychaeta Spetsbergiae, Grönlandiae, Islandiae et Scandinaviae hactenus incognita. Forhandlingar Öfversigt af Kungliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Stockholm, 24, 127–235.Google Scholar
Michaelsen, W., 1896. Die Polychaetenfauna der deutschen Meere einschliesslich der benachbarten und verbindenden Gebiete. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen (Abteilung Kiel und Leipzig), 2 (1), 1–216.Google Scholar
Örsted, A.S., 1843. Annulatorum Danicorum Conspectus, fasc. 1. Maricolae. Hafniae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quatrefages, A. De, 1865. Histoire Naturelle des Annelés Marins et d'Eau Douce, vol. 1. Annélides et G´ephyriens, Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret.Google Scholar
Rainer, S.F., 1984. Nephtys pente sp. nov. (Polychaeta: Nephtyidae) and a key to Nephtys from northern Europe. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 899–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainer, S.F., 1990. Distribution, growth and production of Nepthys hombergii and N. assimilis (Polychaeta: Nephtyidae) in benthic communities of the North Sea. Bulletin of Marine Science, in press.Google Scholar
Saint-Joseph, A. De, 1894. Les annélides polychètes des cotes de Dinard, 3mé partie. Annales des Sciences Naturelles (Zoologie et Paléontologie), 17(1), 1–395.Google Scholar
Savigny, J.C. De, 1818. Annelids. In Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertébres, vol. 5 (ed. de Lamarck, J.B.), pp. 1–612. Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar
Treadwell, A.L., 1914. Polychaetous annelids of the Pacific coast in the collections of the zoological museum of the University of California. University of California Publications in Zoology, 13, 175–234.Google Scholar
Woolf, W.J., 1968. De familie Nephtyidae (Polychaeta). Tabellenserie van de Strandwerkgemeenschap, no. 22, 1–7.Google Scholar