Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:34:45.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Quantitative Study of the Meiofauna of an Exposed Sandy Beach, at Robin Hood's Bay, Yorkshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John S. Gray  and
Reinhard M. Rieger
John S. Gray
Affiliation:
Wellcome Marine Laboratory, University of Leeds, Robin Hood's Bay, Yorkshire
Reinhard M. Rieger*
Affiliation:
Wellcome Marine Laboratory, University of Leeds, Robin Hood's Bay, Yorkshire
*
*Present address: University of North Carolina, Department of Zoology, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Quantitative studies of the meiofauna of marine littoral sediments have been attempted only recently. Much of the work has been done in sheltered areas such as the Danish waddens (Muus, 1967), and in estuaries (Barnett, 1968; Capstick, 1959; Rees, 1940; Riemann, 1966), or in tideless areas such as the Baltic (Fenchel & Jansson, 1966; Fenchel, Jansson & von Thun, 1967; Jansson, 1968). Beaches exposed to tides and wave action have received less attention. Renaud-Debyser (1963) studied quantitative temporal variations in the meiofauna of beaches at the Bassin d'Arcachon, France, and Island of Bimini, Bahamas. Renaud-Debyser & Salvat (1963) have compared quantitatively the meio- and macrofauna of four beaches in the English Channel and six on the Atlantic coast of France. Schmidt (1968, 1969) has analysed quantitatively the distribution and population dynamics of the meiofauna of a number of beaches on the Island of Sylt off the German North Sea coast. Recently Mclntyre (1969) has reviewed the ecology of the meiobenthos. Subsequent to Mclntyre's review, in the U.S.A. quantitative investigations of the Gastrotricha (Hummon, unpublished) and Tardigrada (Pollock, 1970) of Massachusetts beaches have been made. Tropical beach meiofauna has been studied in India (Mclntyre, 1968), on the east coast of Malaya (Renaud-Mornant & Serene, 1967) and in Tuamotu, Polynesia (Salvat & Renaud-Mornant, 1969).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , February 1971 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnett, P. R. O., 1968. Distribution and ecology of harpacticoid Copepods of an intertidal mudflat. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Bd. 53, pp. 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C. I. & Fisher, R. A., 1953. Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data and note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics, Vol. 9, pp. 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisseau, J. P., 1957. Technique pour l'étude quantitative de la faune interstitielle des sables. C. r. Congr. Soc. Sav. Bordeaux, pp. 117–19.Google Scholar
Capstick, C. K., 1959. The distribution of free-living nematodes in relation to salinity in the middle and upper reaches of the river Blyth estuary. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 28, pp. 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, J. S. & Segrove, F., 1955. The fauna living in Stoupe Beck Sands, Robin Hood's Bay (Yorkshire, North Riding). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 426–44.Google Scholar
Fenchel, T., 1969. The ecology of the marine microbenthos. IV. Structure and function of the benthic ecosystem, its chemical and physical factors and the microfauna communities with special reference to the ciliated protozoa. Ophelia, Vol. 6, pp. 1–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenchel, T. & Jansson, B.-O., 1966. On the vertical distribution of the microfauna in the sediments of a brackish-water beach. Ophelia, Vol. 3, pp. 161–77.Google Scholar
Fenchel, T., Jansson, B.-O. & Von Thun, W., 1967. Vertical and horizontal distribution of the metazoan microfauna and of some physical factors of a sandy beach in the northern part of the Øresund. Ophelia, Vol. 4, pp. 227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F., 1963. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 6th edn. 146 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Folk, R. L., 1968. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. 170 pp. Austin Hemphills.Google Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1965. The behaviour of Protodrilus symbioticus Giard in temperature gradients. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 34, pp. 455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1966 a. The response of Protodrilus symbioticus Giard to light. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 35, pp. 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1966 b. Factors controlling the localizations of populations of Protodrilus symbioticus Giard. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 35, pp. 435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1966 c. Selection of sands by Protodrilus symbioticus Giard. Veroff Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerh., Sonderbd. 2. pp. 105–16.Google Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1966 d. The attractive factor of intertidal sands to Protodrilus symbioticus Giard. J.mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 627–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S. & Johnson, R. M., 1970. The bacteria of a sandy beach as an ecological factor affecting the interstitial gastrotrich Turbanella hyalina Schultze. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol., Vol. 4, pp. 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1970. Sample size and sample frequency in quantitative studies of meiofauna. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Meiofauna, Tunis 1969. (Ed. Hulings, N. C..) Smithsonian Institution. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P., 1964. Quantitative Plant Ecology, 2nd edn. 256 pp. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Jansson, B.-O., 1966. Microdistribution of factors and fauna in marine sandy beaches. Vero'ff Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerh., Sonderbd. 2, pp. 77–86.Google Scholar
Jansson, B.-O., 1968. Quantitative and experimental studies of the interstitial fauna in four Swedish sandy beaches. Ophelia, Vol. 5, pp. 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintyre, A. D., 1968. The meiofauna and macrofauna of some tropical beaches. J. Zool., Vol. 156, pp. 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintyre, A., 1969. Ecology of marine meiobenthos. Biol. Rev., Vol. 44, pp. 245–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R., 1957. La teoria de la informacion en ecologia. Mems R. Acad. Cienc. Artes Barcelona, T.33 PP. 373–449.Google Scholar
Muus, B. J., 1967. The fauna of Danish Estuaries and Lagoons. Distribution and ecology of dominating species in the shallow reaches of the mesohaline sone. Meddr Damn. Fisk. Havunders., Vol. 5, pp. 1–316.Google Scholar
Noodt, W., 1953. Entomostracen aus dem Littoral und dem Kustengrundwasser der Finnischen Meerbusens. Acta zool.fenn., Vol. 72, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Pollock, L. W., 1970. Distribution and dynamics of interstitial Tardigrada at Woods Hole, Massachusetts, U.S.A., Ophelia, Vol. 7, pp. 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1940. A preliminary study of the ecology of a mud-flat. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaud-Debyser, J., 1963. Recherches ecologiques sur la faune interstitielle des sables. Bassin d'Arcachon ile de Bimini, Bahamas. Vie Milieu, Suppl. 15, 157 pp.Google Scholar
Renaud-Debyser, J. & Salvat, B., 1963. Elements de prosperite des biotopes des sediments meubles intertidaux et ecologie de leurs populations en microfaune et macrofaune. Vie Milieu, T.14, pp. 463–550.Google Scholar
Renaud-Mornant, J. & Serene, P., 1967. Note sur la microfaune de la côte orientale de la Malaisie. Cah. Pacif., T. 11, 51–73.Google Scholar
Riemann, F., 1966. Die interstitielle Faune im Elbe-Aestuar. Verbreitung und Systematik. Arch. Hydrobiol., Bd. 31 (Suppl.), pp. 1–279.Google Scholar
Salvat, B. & Renaud-Mornant, J., 1969. Etude écologique du macrobenthos et du meiobenthos d'un fond sableux du Lagon de Mururoa (Tuamotu-Polynesie). Cah. Pacif., T.13, pp. 159–79.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat., Vol. 102, pp. 243–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P., 1968. Die quantitative Verteilung und Populations dynamik des Mesopsammons am Gezeiten-Sandstrand der Nordseeinsel Sylt. 1. Faktorengefuge und biologische Gliedenung des Lebensraumes. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Bd. 53, pp. 723–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P., 1969. Die quantitative Verteilung und Populations dynamik des Mesopsammons am Gezeiten-Sandstrand der Nordseeinsel Sylt. II. Quantitative Verteilung und Populations dynamik einzelner Arten. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Bd. 54, pp. 95–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlig, G., 1964. Ein einfache Methode zur Extraction der vagilen mesopsammalen Mikrofauna. Helgolander wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 11, pp. 178–85.Google Scholar
Vitiello, P., 1968. Variations de la densite du microbenthos sur une aire restrainte. Reel Trav. Stn mar. Endoume, Fasc. 59 (Bull. No. 43), pp. 261–70.Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & Buchanan, J. B., 1970. The meiofauna off the coast of Northumberland. I. The structure of the nematode population. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 50, pp. 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. B. J., 1963. Copepoda from the littoral region of the estuary of the River Exe (Devon, England). Crustaceana, Vol. 5, pp. 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B., 1964. Patterns in the Balance of Nature. 324 pp. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar