Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:40:58.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Propulsion Jet of Euphausia Superba (Antarctic Krill) as a Potential Communication Signal among Conspecifics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

K. Wiese  and
Y. Ebina
K. Wiese
Affiliation:
Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum der Universitat, Martin Luther King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Y. Ebina
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, 755, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Individuals of the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana assemble in spring into dense formations (estimated 20,000 m3) which swim for long distances and at considerable speed (estimated 20 cm s−1) to search for patches of phytoplankton (Hamner, 1984). Recruitment to schools and maintenance of a defined position in a travelling formation, a remarkable social behaviour, requires some kind of communication system between individuals.

Vision, as a sophisticated image-processing system, habituating strongly with time, appears inappropriate for the task of continuously monitoring position in the formation. This is not in contradiction of the fact that the prominent eyes of Euphausia orient the shrimp with respect to the axis of light coming from above, and direct the photophores 180° away from light (Land, 1980). The function of the photophores is only partially explained (e.g. predator avoidance by counter-shading, Grinnell et al., 1988), their role in formation swimming being doubtful because they are reportedly active only during dawn and dusk. Of course the eyes help Euphausia to assemble in schools and to evade predators (Strand & Hamner, 1990) as well as fishing nets (Everson & Bone, 1986a,b), but a simple mechanical reflex seems more suitable to control individual position in the formation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 43 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bleckmann, H., Breithaupt, T., Blickhan, R. & Tautz, I., 1991. The time course and frequency content of hydrodynamic events caused by moving fish, frogs, and crustaceans. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 168A,749–757.Google ScholarPubMed
Chapman, C.J. & Sand, O., 1974. Field studies of hearing in two species of flatfish Pleuronectes platessa (L.) and Limanda limanda (L.) (Family Pleuronectidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 47A, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denny, M.W., 1988. Biology and the mechanics of the wave swept environment. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everson, I. & Bone, D.G., 1986 a. Detection of krill (Euphausia superba) near the sea surface: preliminary results using a towed upward-looking echo-sounder. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 72, 61–70.Google Scholar
Everson, I. & Bone, D.G., 1986 b. Effectiveness of the RMT 8 system for sampling krill (Euphausia superba) swarms. Polar Biology, 6,83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, C, Chapman, C. & Neil, D., 1990. The acoustic response threshold of the Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus L. in a free sound field. In Frontiers in crustacean neurobiology (ed. K., Wiese et al.) pp. 106–113. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinnell, A.D., Narins, P.M., Awbrey, F.T., Hamner, W.M. & Hamner, P.P., 1988. Eye/photo-phore co-ordination and light-following in krill, Euphausia superba. Journal of Experimental Biology, 134, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamner, W.M., 1984. Aspects of schooling in Euphausia superba. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 4, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D., 1974. Connections among neurons of different types in crustacean nervous systems. In The neurosciences. III. Study Program (ed. F.O., Schmitt and F.G., Worden), pp. 379–388. Cambridge MA: The MIT-Press.Google Scholar
Kils, U., 1982. The swimming behaviour, swimming performance and energy balance of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. Biomass, Scientific Research Series, 3,1–121.Google Scholar
Klinger, H.H., 1966. Technische Akustik. Hemholtz resonator, pp. 65. MUnchen: Franzis-Verlag.Google Scholar
Land, M.F., 1980. Eye movements and the mechanism of vertical steering in euphausiid Crustacea. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 137A, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhr, B. & Wiese, K., 1990. The antennules of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon as receptors for the velocity component of water displacement. In Brain, perception, cognition: Proceedings of the 18th Gottingen Neurobiology Conference (ed. N., Eisner and G., Roth), Abstract no. 48. Stuttgart: Thieme.Google Scholar
Markl, H., 1983 Vibrational communication. In Neuroethology and behavioural physiology (ed. F., Huber and H., Markl), pp. 332–353. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitson, R.B., 1993. Underwater noise radiated by research vessels. ICES Marine Science Symposia, 196,147–152.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H., 1982. Grenzschicht-Theorie. 8. Auflage. Verlag G. Braun, Karlsruhe, pp. 749–778.Google Scholar
Strand, S.W. & Hamner, W.M., 1990. Schooling behaviour of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) in laboratory aquaria: reactions to chemical and visual stimuli. Marine Biology, 106, 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, I., 1974. Technische Akustik. Helmholtz-resonators, pp. 84. Wiirzburg: Kamprath-Reihe Technik, Vogel Verlag.Google Scholar
Weihs, D., 1975. Some hydrodynamic aspects of fish schooling. In Swimming and flying in nature, vol. 2 (ed. T.Y.T., Wu et al.), pp. 704–718. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wiese, K. & Marschall, H.P., 1990. Sensitivity to vibration and turbulence of water in context with schooling in Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. In Frontiers in crustacean neurobiology (ed. K., Wiese et al.), pp. 121–130. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitear, M., 1962. The fine structure of crustacean proprioceptors. I. The chordotonal organs in the legs of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 245, 291–325.Google Scholar
Wyse, G.A. & Maynard, D.M., 1965. Joint receptors in the antennule of Panulirus argus Latreille. Journal of Experimental Biology, 42, 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar