Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T04:04:05.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary observations on the role of the coelomic cells in food storage and transport in certain polychaetes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. Phillips Dales
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Bedford College, University of London

Extract

Determinations of the concentration of fat and glycogen in the body wall, in different parts of the gut and in the coelomic cells are described in Amphitrite and Arenicola. It is suggested that the trephocyte system constitutes a store of fat and glycogen derived from a primary store in the absorptive parts of the gut itself. In Arenicola and Nereis surplus fat is removed from the gut itself through the blood or directly by amoebocytes; the fat deposited in the epidermis and the glycogen in the peritoneum. In these worms the coelomic trephocytes are solely concerned with the maturation of the gametes. No relationship can be established between these cells and the chloragocytes. In Amphitrite and Terebella fat is stored also in the coelomic trephocytes which may derive their contents directly from the gut or from the body wall. Glycogen is stored in the trephocytes in Amphitrite, and in Arenicola in the peritoneum. Thus while large amounts of fat and glycogen are found in the trephocytes in Amphitrite, the total amount present in the body is no more than in Arenicola which lacks a well-developed trephocyte system, and in this species a larger proportion of fat and glycogen is found in the body wall.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Fattah, R. F., 1955. The chloragogen tissue of earthworms and its relation to urea metabolism. Proc. Egypt. Acad. Sci., Vol. 10, pp. 3650.Google Scholar
Alscher, R. P., 1949. Description of, and localization in, cells of body cavity fluid of Arenicola marina (Lamarck) and Amphitrite ornata (Leidy). Biol. Bull, Woods Hole, Vol. 97, pp. 253–4.Google Scholar
Ashworth, J. H., 1904. Arenicola. L.M.B.C. Memoirs, Vol. 11, 118 pp. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Baker, J. R., 1946. The histochemical recognition of lipine. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 87, pp. 441–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloor, W. R., 1928. The determination of small amounts of lipid in blood plasma. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 77, PP. 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, W. R., 1929. The oxidative determination of phospholipid (lecithin and cephalin) in blood and tissues. J. biol. Chem. Vol. 82, pp. 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, T. F. Von, 1927. Stoff bestand und Ernährung einiger Polychaëten und anderer mariner Würmer. Z. vergl. Physiol., Bd. 5, pp 643–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, A. J., 1947. The use of nile blue in the examination of lipoids. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 88, pp. 383–92.Google Scholar
Casselman, W. G. B., 1954. Acetylated Sudan black B as a more specific histochemical reagent for lipides. Quart. J. micr. Set., Vol. 95, pp. 321–2.Google Scholar
Chiffelle, T. L. & Putt, F. A., 1951. Propylene and ethylene glycol as solvents for sudan IV and sudan black B. Stain Tech., Vol. 26, pp. 51–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claparède, E., 1868. Les annelides chetopodes du Golfe de Naples. 500 pp. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar
Claparède, E., 1873. Recherches sur la structure des Annélides Sédentaires. 200 pp. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L., 1891. Études sur le sang et le glandes lymphatiques dans la série animale. Arch. Zool. exp. gen., Ser. 9, T. 2, pp. 365475.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L., 1898. Études physiologiques sur les Oligochètes. Arch, biol., T. 15, pp. 79124.Google Scholar
Dales, R. P., 1950. The reproduction and larval development of Nereis diversicolor O. F. Müller. J. mar biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 321–60.Google Scholar
Dales, R. P., 1955. Feeding and digestion in terebellid polychaetes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 5579.Google Scholar
Dales, R. P., 1957. The feeding mechanism and morphology of the gut of Owenia fusiformis delle Chiaje. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 81–9.Google Scholar
Dales, R. P. & Kennedy, G. Y., 1954. On the diverse colours of Nereis diversicolor. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33. pp. 699708.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E., 1929. Constitution et proprietes physico-chimiques des éleocytes d'Amphitrite johnstoni (Malmgren). Protoplasma, Vol. 5, pp. 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretter, V., 1953. Experiments with radioactive strontium (90Sr) on certain molluscs and polychaetes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudweiler, H., 1905. Studien über das GefäBsystem niederer Oligochäten. Jena. Z. Naturw., Bd. 40, pp. 383422.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, H. C. & Jensen, N., 1923. Zur Mikrobestimmung des Blutzuckers mittels Ferricyanid. Biochem. Z., Bd. 135, pp. 4658.Google Scholar
Herpin, R., 1921. Sur l'origine et le role des cellules à résèrves de la cavité générale chez Perinereis cultrifera (Gr.) et Perinereis Marioni (Aud. et Edw.) et la differentiation précoce de leurs oeufs. C.R. Acad. Set., Paris., T. 173, pp. 249–52.Google Scholar
Issel, R., 1905. Intorno agli escreti dei linfociti. Arch. Zool. (ital.), Napoli, Vol. 2, PP. 125–35.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. Y., 1953. Partition paper chromatography of the porphyrins. Scand. J. din. Lab. Invest., Vol. 5, pp. 281–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermack, D. M., 1955. The anatomy and physiology of the gut of the polychaete Arenicola marina (L.). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 125, pp. 347–81.Google Scholar
Kollman, M., 1908. Notes sur les réserves albuminoides des Insectes et des Anncircélides. Bull Soc. zool. Fr., T. 34, pp. 149–55.Google Scholar
Liebman, E., 1946. On trephocytes and trephocytosis; a study on the role of leucocytes in nutrition and growth. Growth, Vol. 10, pp. 291330.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1953. Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied, 530 pp. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Picton, L. J., 1898. On the heart body and coelomic fluid of certain polychaetes. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 41, pp. 263302.Google Scholar
Rice, W. J., 1902. Studies in earthworm chloragogue. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 3, PP. 8894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romieu, M., 1921. Les inclusions cristallines des éléocytes de Nereis et leurs relations avec la granulation éosinophile. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 168, pp. 367–9.Google Scholar
Romieu, M., 1923. Recherches histophysiologiques sur le sang et sur le corps cardiaque des Annélides polychètes. This. Fac. Sci. Univ. Paris, 336 pp., Paris: Doin.Google Scholar
Rosa, D., 1896. I linfociti degli Oligocheti. Ricerche istologiche. Mem. R. Accad. Torino, Vol. 46, pp. 149–78.Google Scholar
Rosa, D., 1898. I pretesi rapporti genetici tra i linfociti ed il chloragogeno. Atti Accad., Torino, Vol. 33, pp. 612–37.Google Scholar
Schaeppi, T., 1894. Das Chloragogen von Ophelia radiata. Jena Z. Naturw., Bd. 28, pp. 249–93.Google Scholar
Schneider, G., 1896. Über phagocytäre Organe und Chloragogenzellen der Oligochäten. Z. miss. Zool., Bd. 61, pp. 363–92.Google Scholar
Schneider, G., 1897. Über die Segmentalorgane und den Herzkörper einiger Polychäten. Arb.d. Kaiserl. Naturf. Ges. St. Petersburg, Vol. 27, pp. 135–7.Google Scholar
Schneider, G., 1899. Über Phagocytose und Excretion bei den Anneliden. Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. 66, PP. 497520.Google Scholar
Seton, E. & Wilbur, G. G., 1949. Glucose metabolism in marine annelids. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 97, p. 246.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. & Hopkins, C. A., 1948. Ester wax as a medium for embedding tissue for the histological demonstration of glycogen. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 89, PP. 431–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Sperry, W. M., 1938. A micromethod for the determination of the total and free cholesterol. Amer. J. din. Path., Tech. Suppl, Vol. 2, pp. 91–9.Google Scholar
Sterling, S., 1908. Das BlutgefäBsystem der Oligochäten. Jena Z. Naturw., Bd. 44, PP. 253352.Google Scholar
Wilbur, C. G. & Bayors, W. M., 1947. A comparative study of the lipids in some marine annelids. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 93, pp. 99101.Google Scholar
Willem, V. & Minne, A., 1900. Recherches sur l'excrétion chez quelques Annélides. Mém. Acad. R. Belg. Cl. Sci., T. 58, pp. 173.Google Scholar