Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:10:21.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary observations on the fine structure of Prasinocladus marinus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. Parke
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
I. Manton
Affiliation:
Botany Department, The University, Leeds

Abstract

The type species of Prasinocladus has been re-investigated in cultured material from the Devon coast and studied electron-microscopically by whole mounts and by sections. Salient findings include: the presence of two layers of scales together with characteristic hairs on all four flagella; the arrangement of the flagellar bases in a row, and of characteristic flagellar ‘roots’; the presence of an unusual condition of the pyrenoid with respect to the nucleus; and the structure and behaviour of the theca as different from that of an ordinary cell wall. It is concluded that the genus could appropriately serve as the type of a group to include all known genera and species of monads containing chlorophyll b that possess scaly flagella, but no recommendations are made as to whether the name Prasinophyceae (Christensen, 1962) should be restricted to these or be permitted to cover other known green flagellates lacking scales on their flagella. This investigation is continuing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chadefaud, M., 1941. Sur l'organisation et la position systématique des flagellés du genre Pyramidomonas. Rev. scient., Paris, Année 79, pp. 113–14.Google Scholar
Chadefaud, M. 1947. Etude sur l'organisation de deux Volvocales sédentaires marines, Prasinocladus lubricus et Chlorodendron subsalum. Rev. scient., Paris, Annee 85, pp. 862–5.Google Scholar
Chadefaud, M. 1950. Les cellules nageuses des algues dans l'embranchement des Chlorophycées. C.r. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 231, pp. 988–90.Google Scholar
Chadefaud, M. 1960. ‘Les végétaux non vasculaires (Cryptogamie)’ in Chadefaud, M. et Emberger, L., Traité de Botanique, Systématique, T. 1, 1018 pp.Google Scholar
Chihara, M., 1963. The life-history of Prasinocladus ascus as found in Japan, with special reference to the systematic position of the genus. Phycologia, Vol. 3, pp. 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., 1962. Alger. In Böcher, T. W., Lange, M. & Sørenson, T., Botanik, Bd. 2 (Systematisk Botanik), Nr. 2, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Cienkowski, L., 1881. An account of the White Sea Excursion for 1880. (In Russian.) Trav. Soc. Nat. St. Pétersb., T. 12, pp. 130–71.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P. A., 1912. Recherches sur quelques Algues nouvelles ou peu connues. Botaniste. Sér. 12, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Ettl, H. & Manton, I., 1964. Die feinere Struktur von Pedinomonas minor Korschikoff. Nova Hedwigia, Bd. 8, pp. 421–51.Google Scholar
Fritsch, F. E., 1949. Contributions to our knowledge of British algae. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 1, pp. 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuckuck, P. 1894. Bemerkungen zur marinen Algenvegetation von Helgoland. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Bd. 1, pp. 223–63.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1935. Über Rhodomonas, Platymonas und Prasinocladus. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., Bd. 5, Nr. 22, pp. 113.Google Scholar
Manton, I., 1959. Electron microscopical observations on a very small flagellate: the problem of Chromulina pusilla Butcher. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, pp. 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., 1964. Further observations on the fine structure of the haptonema in Prymesium parvum. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 49, pp. 315–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manton, I. 1965. Some phylctic implications of flagellar structure in plants. In Advances in Botanical Research, Vol. 2, ed. R. D. Preston. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Manton, I., Oates, K. & Parke, M., 1963. Observations on the fine structure of the Pyramimonas stage of Halosphaera and preliminary observations on three species of Pyramimonas. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Parke, M. 1960. Further observations on small green flagellates with special reference to possible relatives of Chromulina pusilla Butcher. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., Rayns, D. G., Ettl, H. & Parke, M., 1965. Further observations on green flagellates with scaly flagella: the genus Heteromastix Korshikov. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, Peter S., 1964. A revised check-list of British marine algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 499542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Rayns, D. G., 1964. Studies on marine flagellates. VII. Nephroselmis gilva sp.nov. and some allied forms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proskauer, J., 1950. On Prasinocladus. Am. J. Bot., Vol. 37, pp. 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S., 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol., Vol. 17, pp. 208–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waern, M., 1952. Rocky-shore algae in the Öregrund Archipelago. Acta phytogeogr. suec., Vol., 30, 298 pp.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, W., 1925. Helgoländer Meeresalgen. I-VI. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Abt. Helgoland, Bd. 16, H. 1, pp. 125.Google Scholar