Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:40:53.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-Larval Development of the Tellinacean Bivalves Abra Alba, Tellina Fabula and Donax Vittatus (Mollusca: Bivalvia), With Reference to the Late Larva

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. M. Webb
C. M. Webb
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, University College, Swansea SA2 8PP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The post-larval shell and hinge development of the bivalves Abra alba (Wood), Tellina fabula Gmelin and Donax vittatus (da Costa) from the recently metamorphosed size to a juvenile size of 1·2–1·4 mm shell length has been examined using scanning electron microscopy. Early post-larval development in the stages up to 1·0–1·2 mm size can involve considerable morphogenetic change and requires careful description with photographic developmental series. The form of the pediveliger larva is present in the early post-larval shell and confirms the identity of the larvae of A. alba and T. fabula. The veliger and pediveliger larvae of A. alba are described. The similar larval form of the tellinacean bivalves is modified by differential margin growth early in post-larval development. Comparison of these bivalves with allied species reveals that the post-larvae are distinguishable at even the smallest sizes by the shell and hinge form. The metamorphic size of A. alba ranges from 0·26 to 0·31 mm, of T. fabula from 0·25 to 0·28 mm and of D. vittatus from 0·25 to 0·35 mm. The bivalve post-larvae were collected from the shallow sublittoral of Oxwich Bay, Bristol Channel, U.K., and the larvae from the overlying waters, during the years 1980–2.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , August 1986 , pp. 749 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aabel, J. P., 1983. Morphology and function in post-metamorphal Abra alba (Bivalvia: Tellinacea). Sarsia, 68, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D., 1962. The functional morphology of the larva, and the post-larval development of Venus striatula (da Costa). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 42, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, F., 1898. Recherches ontogeniques et morphologiques sur la coquille des lamellibranches; premiere partie, Taxodontes et Anisomyaires. Annales des sciences naturelles (Zoologie), 8, 1–208.Google Scholar
Chanley, P., 1969. Larval development of the coquina clam Donax variabilis Say, with a discussion of the structure of the larval hinge in the Tellinacea. Bulletin of Marine Science, 19, 214–223.Google Scholar
Chanley, P. & Andrews, J. D., 1971. Aids for identification of bivalve larvae of Virginia. Malacologia, 11, 45–119.Google Scholar
Frenkiel, L. & Moueza, M., 1979. Developpement larvaire de deux Tellinacea, Scrobiculariaplana (Semelidae) et Donax vittatus (Donacidae). Marine Biology, 55, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkiel, L. & Moueza, M., 1984. Etude ontogenetique de l'organe sensoriel du muscle cruciforme des Tellinacea. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 50, 162–178.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. & LUTZ, R. A., 1980. Molluscan larval shell morphology, ecological and palaeontological applications. In Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms (ed. Rhoads, D. C. and Lutz, R. A.), pp. 323–377. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B., 1946. Lamellibranch veligers from Danish waters. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersogelser (ser. Plankton), 4, 277–314.Google Scholar
Kandler, R., 1926. Muschellarven aus dem Helgolander plankton. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen der Kommission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere (abt. Helgoland), 16, 1–8.Google Scholar
Labarbera, M., 1974. Larval and post-larval development of five species of Miocene bivalves. Journal of Palaeontology, 48, 256–277.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1938. Notes on the breeding of some lamellibranchs from Plymouth and their larvae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 23, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. & Davies, H. C., 1963. Rearing of bivalve molluscs. Advances in Marine Biology, 1, 1–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L., Davis, H. C. & Chanley, P., 1966. Dimensions and shapes of larvae of some marine bivalve molluscs. Malacologia, 4, 351–435.Google Scholar
Loven, G., 1848. Beitrage zur kenntnis der entwicklung der Mollusca, Acephala Lamellibranchia. Abhandlungen der K. Schwedisch Akademie Wissenschaften (republished in 1879 at Stockholm with additional notes, 1–39).Google Scholar
Muus, K., 1973. Settling, growth and mortality of young bivalves in the Oresund. Ophelia, 12, 79–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nott, P. L., 1980. Reproduction in Abra alba (Wood) and Abra tenuis (Montagu) (Tellinacea: Scrobiculariidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 465–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ockelmann, K. W., 1965. Developmental types in marine bivalves and their distribution along the Atlantic coast of Europe. In Proceedings of the First European Malacological Congress, 1962 (ed. Cox, L. R. and Peake, J.), pp. 25–35. London: Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and the Malacological Society of London.Google Scholar
Raven, C. P., 1958. Morphogenesis: the Analysis of Molluscan Development. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1950. The identification and classification of lamellibranch larvae. Hull Bulletins of Marine Ecology, 3, 73–104.Google Scholar
Sastry, A. N., 1979. Reproduction of pelecypods (excluding Ostreidae). In Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, vol. 5. Molluscs: Pelecypoda and Lesser Classes (ed. Giese, A. C. and Pearse, J.), pp. 113–292. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, C. M., 1948. Bivalve larvae of Malpeque Bay P.E.I. Bulletin. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, no. 77, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Webb, C. M., 1984. Seasonal Variation and Settlement of Some Marine Benthic Invertebrate Larvae on Sediments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Werner, B., 1939. Uber die entwicklung und artunterscheidung von muschellarven des nordseeplanktons, unter besonderer berucksichtigung der schalenentwicklung. Zoologische Jahrbücher (abt. Anatomie und Ontologie der Tiere), 66, 1–54.Google Scholar
Zakhvatkina, K. A., 1959. Larvae of bivalve mollusks of the Sevastopol region of the Black Sea. Trudy Sevastopol' skoῖ biologicheskoῖ stantsii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 11, 108–152.Google Scholar