Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:53:05.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological response of temperate microphytobenthos to freezing temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2013

Shi Hong Lee  and
Andrew McMinn
Shi Hong Lee
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia
Andrew McMinn*
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. McMinn, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microphytobenthos (MPB) contributes up to half the primary production of estuaries. These microorganisms are sensitive to changes in sediment temperatures, particularly the extreme temperatures during exposure periods. This study investigates the physiological responses of MPB to freezing temperatures at two locations near Hobart, Tasmania during winter. Photosynthetic parameters were measured at 2 mm intervals to a depth of 10 mm. FV/FM values at three different distances from the shoreline at Kings Beach and Browns River in winter were between 0.584 and 0.617. rETRmax values were between 24.696 and 20.773. Maximum α values peaked in the subsurface rather than at the sediment surface. In vitro laboratory experiments (down to −5°C) showed little difference in response between the control and treatment groups, indicating no apparent effects of short term freezing on the MPB. Little change in photosynthetic parameters in response to freezing was probably associated with the resistance of light-harvesting reactions to freezing temperatures, recovery of the plasmalemma integrity or cryoprotection. Sediment composition and species composition were similar at both sampling sites. Therefore, responses of MPB were not due to species and grain size composition.

Keywords

microphytobenthosphotosynthesistemperaturediatomthermoinhibitionsediment surfacemaximum relative electron transport rateprimary productionfluorescence
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 8 , December 2013 , pp. 2039 - 2047
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barranguet, C., Kromkamp, J. and Peene, J. (1998) Factors controlling primary production and photosynthetic characteristics of intertidal microphytobenthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 173, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer-Giraldi, M., Uhlig, C., John, U., Mock, T. and Valentin, K. (2010) Antifreeze proteins in polar sea ice diatoms: diversity and gene expression in the genus Fragilariopsis . Environmental Microbiology 12, 1041–1052.Google Scholar
Bayer-Giraldi, M., Weikusat, I., Besir, H. and Dieckmann, G. (2011) Characterization of an antifreeze protein from the polar diatom Fragilariopsis cylindrus and its relevance in sea ice. Cryobiology 63, 210–219.Google Scholar
Blanchard, G. and Guarini, J.M. (1996) Studying the role of mud temperature on the hourly variation of the photosynthetic capacity of microphytobenthos in intertidal areas. Ecology 319, 1153–1158.Google Scholar
Blanchard, G., Simon, B.B. and Guarini, J.M. (2002) Properties of the dynamics of intertidal microphytobenthic biomass. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82, 1027–1028.Google Scholar
Boudreau, B.P. and Jorhensen, B.B. (2001) The benthic boundary layer—transport processes and biochemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 404 pp.Google Scholar
Davey, M. (1989) The effects of freezing and desiccation on photosynthesis and survival of terrestrial Antarctic algae and cyanobacteria. Polar Biology 10, 29–36.Google Scholar
Davison, I., Dudgeon, S. and Ruan, H. (1989) Effect of freezing on seaweed photosynthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 58, 123–131.Google Scholar
Du, G.Y., Li, W.T., Li, H. and Chung, I.K. (2012) Migratory responses of benthic diatoms to light and temperature monitored by chlorophyll fluorescence. Journal of Plant Science 55, 159–164.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, S., Davison, I. and Vadas, R. (1989) Effect of freezing on photosynthesis of intertidal macroalgae: relative tolerance of Chondrus crispus and Mastocarpus stellatus (rhodophyta). Marine Biology 101, 107–114.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, S., Davison, I. and Vadas, R. (1990) Freezing tolerance in the intertidal red algae Chondrus crispus and Mastocarpus stellatus: relative importance of acclimation and adaptation. Marine Biology 106, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkowsi, P.G. and Raven, J.A. (1997) Aquatic photosynthesis. Boston, MA: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Folk, R. (1974). Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Austin, TX: Hemphill Publishing Company, available at: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/geo/folkready/folkprefrev.html (accessed 9 May 2013).Google Scholar
Foreman, C., Dieser, M., Greenwood, M., Cory, R., Laybourn-Parry, J., Lisle, J., Jaros, C., Miller, P., Chin, Y. and McKnight, D. (2011) When a habitat freezes solid: microorganisms over-winter within the ice column of a coastal Antarctic lake. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 76, 401–412.Google Scholar
Genty, B., Briantais, J.M. and Baker, N.R. (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) 990, 87–92.Google Scholar
Guarini, J.M., Blanchard, G.F., Gros, P., Gouleau, D. and Bacher, C. (2000) Dynamic model of the short-term variability of microphytobentic biomass on temperate intertidal mudflats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 195, 291–303.Google Scholar
Harding, K., Day, J., Lorenz, M., Timmermann, H., Friedl, T., Bremner, D. and Benson, E. (2004) Introduction of the concept and application of vitrification for the cryo-conservation of algae—a mini review. Nova Hedwigia 79, 207–226.Google Scholar
Herlory, O., Guarini, J.M., Richard, P. and Blanchard, G.F. (2004) Microstructure of microphytobenthic biofilm and its spatio-temporal dynamics in an intertidal mudflat (Aiguillon Bay, France). Marine Ecology Progress Series 282, 33–44.Google Scholar
Jordan, L., McMinn, A. and Wotherspoon, S. (2008) Diurnal and monthly vertical profiles of benthic microalgae within intertidal sediments from two temperate localities. Marine and Freshwater Research 59, 931–939.Google Scholar
Jordan, L., McMinn, A. and Thompson, P. (2010) Diurnal changes of photoadaptive pigments in microphytobenthos. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 1025–1032.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.R. and Smith, J.-C. (1983) A small volume, short incubation time method for measurement of photosynthesis as a function of incident irradiance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 13, 99–102.Google Scholar
Koh, C., Khim, J.S., Araki, H., Yamanishi, H. and Koga, K. (2007) Within-day and seasonal patterns of microphytobenthos biomass determined by co-measurement of sediment and water column chlorophylls in the intertidal mudflat of Nanaura, Saga, Ariake sea, Japan. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72, 42–52.Google Scholar
Kromkamp, J., de Brouwer, J., Blanchard, G.F., Forster, R. and Creach, V. (2006) Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Morris, E. and Kromkamp, J.C. (2003) Influence of temperature on the relationship between oxygen- and fluorescence-based estimates of photosynthetic parameters in a marine benthic diatom (Cylindrotheca closterium). European Journal of Phycology 38, 133–142.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. and Davison, I. (1993) Freezing rate and duration determine the physiological response of intertidal fucoids to freezing. Marine Biology 115, 353–362.Google Scholar
Platt, T., Gallegos, C.L., and Harrison, W.G. (1980) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton. Journal of Marine Research 38, 687–701.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, available at: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 9 May 2013).Google Scholar
Ralph, P.J., McMinn, A., Ryan, K.G., and Ashworth, C. (2005) Short-term effect of temperature on the photokinetics of microalgae from the surface layers of Antarctic pack ice. Journal of Phycology 41, 763–769.Google Scholar
Ralph, P. and Gademann, R. (2005) Rapid light curves: a powerful tool to assess photo-synthetic activity. Aquatic Botany 82, 222–237.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. (2000) Distribution and partial characterization of an ice-active molecule associated with sea ice diatoms. Polar Biology 23, 721–729.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. and Knight, C. (2003) Ice binding, recrystallization inhibition, and cryoprotective properties of ice-active substances associated with Antarctic sea ice diatoms. Cryobiology 46, 174–181.Google Scholar
Sabacka, M. and Elster, J. (2006) Response of cyanobacteria and algae from Antarctic wetland habitats to freezing and desiccation stress. Polar Biology 30, 31–37.Google Scholar
Saunders, K., Lane, C., Cook, S., McMinn, A. and Hallegraeff, G. (2010) Benthic diatoms. In Hallegraeff, G.M., Bolch, C.J.S., Hill, D.R.A., Jameson, I., LeRoi, J.-M., McMinn, A., Murray, S., de Salas, M.F. and Saunders, K. (eds) Algae of Australia: phytoplankton of temperate coastal waters. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 83–144.Google Scholar
Serodio, J. and Catarino, F. (2000) Modeling the primary productivity of intertidal microphytobenthos: time scales of variability and effects of migratory rhythms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 192, 13–30.Google Scholar
Underwood, G. and Kromkamp, J. (1999) Primary production by phytoplankton and microphytobenthos in estuaries. Advances in Ecological Research 29, 93–153.Google Scholar
Underwood, G. and Provot, L. (2000) Determining the environmental preferences of four estuarine epipelic diatoms taxa: growth across a range of salinity, nitrate and ammonium conditions. European Journal of Phycology 35, 173–182.Google Scholar
White, A. and Critchley, C. (1999) Rapid light curves: a new fluorescence method to assess the state of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosynthetic Research 59, 63–72.Google Scholar