Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:24:59.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the fecundity of some gammarids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. Cheng
Affiliation:
From the Department of Zoology ofthe University College of North Wales, Bangor.

Extract

1. The number of species found in this investigation is six, of which four are marine and two brackish water.

2. The mean value of the body weight and the fecundity varies with the species. The size of a species bears no relation whatever to the reproductive capacity.

3. The fecundity is subject to seasonal variation, being generally higher in the spring than in the winter months.

4. In general, a positive correlation exists between body weight and fecundity of the individuals of each species. This rule does not, however, apply to Gammarus duebeni, in which the fecundity appears to fall after reaching its maximum at the 19 mg. body-weight class.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J., 1895. The reproduction of the lobster. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. IV, pp. 6070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banta, A. M., 1939. Studies on the physiology, genetics and evolution of some Cladocera. Washington, Carneg. Instn., Dept. of Genetics, Paper No. 39.Google Scholar
Beadle, L. C. & Cragg, J. B., 1940. The intertidal zone of two streams and the occurrence of Gammarus spp. on South Rona and Raasay (Inner Hebrides). Journ. Anin. Ecol., Vol. IX, pp. 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, K., 1931. Studies on the Genus Daphnia O. F. Müller with especial reference to the mode of reproduction. Vidensk. Medd. Naturh. Foun. Kdh., Vol. 92.Google Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1937. The fauna of certain estuaries in West England and South Wales, with special reference to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 95106.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., 1930. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 3rd edition. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. W., 1932. The potential and actual fecundity of some breeds of rabbits. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. LXII, pp. 271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickling, C. F., 1940. The fecundity of the herring of the southern North Sea. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV, pp. 619–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingle, L., 1933. Effects of environmental conditions on longevity. Science, Vol. LXXVIII, p. 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingle, L., Wood, T. R. & Banta, A. M., 1937. A study of longevity, growth, reproduction and heart rate in Daphnia longispina as influenced by limitations in quantity of food. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. LXXVI, pp. 325–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, L. H., 1940. An account of the littoral fauna of the Anglesey coast of the Menai Straits from the Tubular Bridge to Menai Lighthouse. Anglesey Antiquarian Soc. Trans., pp. 100–10.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1928. On the rearing and breeding of Gammarus in laboratory conditions. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XV, pp. 3355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, E. W. & Matthews, A., 1913. Notes on the life history of Gammarus chevreuxi. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. IX, p. 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, E. W. & Spooner, G. M., 1940. An account of Marinogammarus (Schellenberg) Gen. nov. (Amphipoda), with a description of a new species, pirloti, M.. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV, pp. 633–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, U. B., 1938. Growth, habits and fecundity of the Ciscoes of Irondequoit Bay, New York. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., Vol. LXVII, pp. 234–45.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V. C., 1929. The reproductive organs of the herring in relation to growth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 4965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar