Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T19:39:38.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a New Species of Hydroid, Staurocoryne Filiformis, with a Revision of the Genus Staurocoryne Rotch, 1872

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

W. J. Rees
Affiliation:
Research Assistant at the Plymouth Laboratory.

Extract

The writer has recently reared a species of hydroid at Plymouth, which, in the vegetative state, might easily be confused with Slauridium productum Wright, 1858. The original creeping stolon from which the colony developed was found on a piece of dead Eunicella verrucosa (Pallas) dredged by the S.S.Salpa near Stoke Point on March 9th, 1936.

When isolated in a finger-bowl with “outside” sea water the stolon bore no polyps and showed no sign of activity, but three weeks later a single polyp had developed (Fig. 3). From its close resemblance to the figures given by Hartlaub (1895) for S. productum, it was at first assumed to be this species and was carefully watched and fed in the hope of rearing the medusæ from it. After a period of time, however, when the colony had increased considerably in size, styloid gonophores were developed.

The type of growth of the fully grown colony is shown in Figures 1 and 2. The stems are elongated and slender, bearing polyps at intervals. Polyps are borne at the summit and also on branches of the main stems. These branches usually arise from one side only of the main stems and it is probable that under natural conditions in the sea these main stems are really stolons. It is also likely that in nature the intervals between the polyps are fairly short. The whole colony has a faint yellow-brown colour which becomes reddish-brown in the polyps and the upper part of the hydrocaulus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allman, G. T. 1871. A Monograph of the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids. Ray. Soc., London.Google Scholar
Van Beneden, P. J. 1866. Recherches sur la faune littorale de Belgique. Mém. Acad. R. Belgique, Tome XXXVI.Google Scholar
Drzewina, A., and Bohn, G. 1916. Sur un changement du type de symétrie (symétrie metabolique) chez un hydraire Stauridium productum. C. R. Biol. Soc., Paris, Tome LXXIX, pp. 131134.Google Scholar
Gosse, P. H. 1853. A Naturalist's Rambles on the Devonshire Coast, pp. 222225. London.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C. 1895. Polypen und Quallen von Slauridium productum Wright und Perigonimus repens Wright. Zeit. f. Wiss. Zool., Bd. LXI, pp. 142162.Google Scholar
Hincks, T. 1868. History of British Hydroid Zoophytes, Vols. I and II.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotch, W. D. 1872. On a new genus and species of Hydroid Zoophytes. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (4), Vol. 10, pp. 126127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stechow, E. 1923. Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete, Teil II. Zool. Jahrb., Bd. 47, Abt. f. Syst., pp. 29270.Google Scholar
Wright, T. Strethill. 1858. Observations on British Zoophytes. Edin. New Phil. Journ., Vol. VII, New Series, p. 283.Google Scholar