Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:04:30.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Occurrence of the smooth sand-eel, Gymnammodytes Semisquamatus (Jourdain), in the Plymouth area, with notes on G. cicerelus (Rafinesque), and G. capensis (Barnard)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Extract

Gymnammodytes semisquatnatus, the North Atlantic smooth sand-eel, has a continuous distribution from southern Norway to the southern Atlantic coast-line of Spain. Its occurrence in the Irish Sea and in the Plymouth area are new records. In the latter area it is an off-shore species, apparently concentrating in shell gravel in winter for spawning. It has a mean vertebral number of slightly over 68 (Plymouth and Scottish specimens). A small sample of the Mediterranean species, G. cicerelus, gives a mean of just over 66, while the South African species, G. capensis, which is indistinguishable from G. semisquamatus by external non-metameric characters, has a much lower mean of 58·5.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acloque, A., 1900. Faune de France. Tome I. Mammiferes, Oiseaux, Poissons, Reptiles, Batrachiens, Protochordes. Paris 1900. 540 pp.Google Scholar
Barnard, K. H., 1927. Diagnoses of new genera and species of South African marine fishes. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, Vol. XX pp. 6679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buen, F. de, 1935. Fauna Ictiológica. Catálogo de los peces Ibéricos: aguas dukes, pelágicos y de los abismos próximos. Primera parte. Noras Inst. Esp. Oceanog., No. 88, pp. 1149.Google Scholar
Collett, R., 1904. Meddelelser om Norges Fiske i Aarene 1884–1901. (3die Hovedsupplement til ‘Norges Fiske’). II. Fork. VidenskSelsk. Krist., 1903, No. 9, pp. 1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, P. G. & Vati, V., 1949. The post-larval sand-eels (Ammodytidae) of the Celtic Sea and Plymouth area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVIII, pp. 287313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncker, G. & Mohr, E., 1939. Revision der Ammodytidae. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berl., Bd. 24, Heft 1, pp. 831.Google Scholar
Fage, L. 1918. Shore fishes. Rep. Danish Oceanogr. Exped. Medit., No. 4, Vol. II (Biology), A. 3, pp. 1154Google Scholar
Gonçalves, B. C., 1942. Colecçũo oceanográfica de D. Carlos I. Catálogo dos peixes. Trav. Sta. Biol. Mark. Lisbonne, No. 46, pp. 1108.Google Scholar
Grieg, J. A., 1912. Icthyologiske notiser III. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1911, Nr. 6, pp. 138.Google Scholar
Günther, A., 1867. Additions to the British Fauna. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 3, Vol. XX, pp. 288–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdain, S. 1879. Sur les Ammodytes des côtes de la Manche. Revue de Sciences Naturelles, T. I, pp. 203–10.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. 1915. Sveriges Ryggradsdjur. 3. Kraldjur, Groddjur, Fiskar. Stockholm 1915, 331 pp.Google Scholar
Moreau, E., 1891. Histoire naturelle des poissons de la France. Supplément. Paris 1891, 144 pp.Google Scholar
Poll, M., 1947. Faune de Belgique. Poissons Marins. Bruxelles. 452 pp.Google Scholar
Raitt, D. S., 1934. A preliminary account of the sand eels of Scottish waters. Journ. Cons. Int. Expl. Mer, Vol. IX, pp. 365–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raitt, D. S., 1935. The occurrence of four species of sand eels, of economic importance, in Scottish waters, one of which is new to science. Scot. Nat., No. 211, pp. 61–2.Google Scholar