Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:38:52.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The occurrence of Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer, an intestinal copepod parasite of Mytilus, in the south-west of England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. T. Davey  and
J. M. Gee
J. T. Davey
Affiliation:
NERC Institute for Marine Environmental Research, Citadel Road, Plymouth PL1 3DH
J. M. Gee
Affiliation:
NERC Institute for Marine Environmental Research, Citadel Road, Plymouth PL1 3DH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The occurrence of Mytilicola intestinalis in populations of mussels in south-west England is recorded and compared with previous data. Since 1955 there have been two main changes in the distribution of Mytilicola: (a) it has invaded all the major estuarine mussel populations on the Bristol Channel coast, and (b) many previously uninfested open-coast populations all round the peninsula are now lightly infested. It is suggested that differences in infestation levels between estuarine and open-coast populations of mussels are due primarily to differences in the degree of exposure to wave action although factors such as size, population density and location of the hosts also influence infestation. The chance of the establishment of breeding pairs of Mytilicola depends on the parasite population size and its distribution through the host population

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 85 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, R. H., Bolster, G. C. & Cole, H. A., 1951. Mytilicola intestinalis in the European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis. Nature, London, 168, 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantine, W. J., 1961. A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Studies, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Bolster, G. C., 1954. The biology and dispersal of Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer, a copepod parasite of mussels. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series 2, 18 (6), 1–30.Google Scholar
Bouquet, C. & Stock, J. H., 1957. Copépodes parasites d'invertébrés des côtes de France. Travaux de la Station biologique de Roscoff, 8, 223–39.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A., 1951. Le Mytilicola en Angleterre. Revue des traveux de l'Office (scientifique et technique) des pêches maritimes, 17, 56–61.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Savage, R. E., 1951. The effect of the parasitic copepod Mytilicola intestinalis (Steuer) upon the condition of mussels. Parasitology, 41, 156–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couteaux-Bargeton, M., 1953. Contributions a l'étude de Mytilus edulis L. parasité par Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer. Journal du Conseil, 19, 80–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, M., 1972. The parasitology of Irish mussels (Mytilus edulis). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C.M. Papers and Reports), K: 8, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Dare, P. J., 1974. A survey of the distribution limits of Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer in England and Wales, 1972–74. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C.M. Papers and Reports), K: 12, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Dethlefsen, V., 1972. Zur Parasitologie der Miesmuschel (Mytilus edulis L.). Bericht der deutschen wissenschaftlichen Kommission für Meeresforschung, 22, 344–71.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, J., 1971. Further observations on the distribution of Mytilicola intestinalis around Scotland. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C.M. Papers and Reports), K: 31, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Grainger, J. N. R., 1951. Notes on the biology of the copepod Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer. Parasitology, 41, 135–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepper, B. T., 1953. Artificial infection of various molluscs with Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer. Nature, London, 172, 250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepper, B. T., 1955. Environmental factors governing the infection of mussels by Mytilicola intestinalis. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series 2, 20 (3), 1–21.Google Scholar
Hockley, A. R., 1951. On the biology of Mytilicola intestinalis (Steuer). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 30, 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleeton, G., 1963. Corrélation entre la fréquence de Trochicola entericus Dollfus 1914, et les conditions du milieu. Proceedings K. Nederlandse akademie van wetenschappen (C), 66, 70–3.Google Scholar
Korringa, P., 1951. Le Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer (Copepoda parasitica) menace l'industrie moulière en Zelande. Revue des travaux de l'Office (scientifique et technique) des pêches maritimes, 17, 9–13.Google Scholar
Meyer, P. F. & Mann, H., 1950. Beiträge zur Epidemiologie und Physiologie der parasitischen Copepoden Mytilicola intestinalis. Archiv für Fischerei-wissenschaft, 2, 120–34.Google Scholar
Seed, R., 1968. Factors influencing shell shape in the mussel Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 561–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H., 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics, with special reference to the biological sciences. 479 pp. London and New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Waugh, G. D., 1954. The occurrence of Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer on the east coast of England. Journal of Animal Ecology, 23, 364–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. S., 1969. The life-history of Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer. Journal du Conseil, 32, 419–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar