Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T09:20:37.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Fine Structure of Zoids of the Genus Phaeocystis [Haptophyceae]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. Parke ,
J. C. Green  and
I. Manton
M. Parke
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
J. C. Green
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
I. Manton
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Observations on the fine structure of two clones of zoids derived from Phaeocystis pouchetii s.l. are presented, with special reference to the scales, pyrenoids and haptonema, in which both clones agree. An unexplained difference between them in the form of a threadlike deposit external to the scales in one clone only is described in a preliminary way. The most remarkable feature encountered is the presence of some unexplained bulbous inclusions distorting the tip of the haptonema but perhaps also present in a less extreme form in other types recently examined alive. The interpretation of these findings is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , November 1971 , pp. 927 - 941
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Green, J. C. & Manton, I. 1970. Studies in the fine structure and taxonomy of flagellates in the genus Pavlova. I. A revision of Pavlova gyrans, the type species. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 50, pp. 1113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashkin, N. I. 1963. Data on the ecology of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim 1893 (Chrysophyceae). II. Habitat and specification of biogeographical characteristics. Okeanologia (Moscow), Vol. 3, pp. 697–705.Translated from the RussianGoogle Scholar
Kayser, H. 1970. Experimental-ecological investigation on Phaeocystis pouchetii (Haptophyceae): cultivation and waste water test. Helgoldnder wiss. Meeresunters, Bd. 20, pp. 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaveness, D. & Paasche, E. 1971. Two different Coccolithus huxleyi cell types incapable of coccolith formation. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 75, pp. 382–5.Google Scholar
Kornmann, P. 1955. Beobachtungen an Phaeocystis-Kulwien. Helgoldänder wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 5, pp. 218–33.Google Scholar
Lagerheim, G. 1893. Phaeocystis, nov.gen., grundadt pa Tetraspora Poucheti Har. Bot. Notiser, 1893 PP. 32–3.Google Scholar
Lagerheim, G. 1896. űber Phaeocystis Poucheti (Har.) Lagerh., eine Plankton-Flagellate. Ofvers. K. VetenskAkad. Fork., Bd. 53, pp. 277–88.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, J. et al., 1966. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the Tenth International Botanical Congress, Edinburgh, August, 1964, 402 pp. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C. 1970. Preliminary observations on differences of scale morphology at various stages in the life cycle of' Apistonema-Syracosphaera' sensu von Stosch. Br. phycol. J., Vol. 5, pp. 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C. 1971 a. Observations by means of cine photography on the behaviour of the haptonema in plankton flagellates of the class Haptophyceae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 51, pp. 207–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C. 1971b. Observations on the life history of the haptophycean alga Pleurochrysis scherffelii with special reference to the microanatomy of the different types of motile cells. Ann. Bot., N.S., Vol. 35, pp. 429–39.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C. & Manton, I. 1969a. New observations on the fine structure of Chrysochromulina strobilus Parke and Manton with special reference to some unusual features of the haptonema and scales. Arch. MikrobioL, Bd. 66, pp. 105–20.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C. & Manton, I. 1969b. Chrysochromulina camella sp.nov. and C. cymbium sp.nov., two new relatives of C. strobilus Parke and Manton.Arch. Mikrobiol, Bd. 68, pp. 116–32.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C. & Manton, I. 1971. Fine structure and light microscopy of a new species of Chrysochromulina (C. acantha). Arch. Mikrobiol, Bd. 78, pp. 58–69.Google Scholar
Manton, I. 1964. Further observations on the fine structure of the haptonema in Prymnesium parvum. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 49, pp. 315–30.Google Scholar
Manton, I. 1967a. Further observations on the fine structure of Chrysochromulina chiton with special reference to the haptonema, ‘peculiar’ golgi structure and scale production. J. Cell Sci., Vol. 2, pp. 265–72.Google Scholar
Manton, I. 1967b. Further observations on scale formation in Chrysochromulina chiton. J. Cell Sci., Vol. 2, pp. 411–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manton, I. 1968. Further observations on the microanatomy of the haptonema in Chrysochromulina chiton and Prymnesium parvum. Protoplasma, Vol. 66, pp. 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Leedale, G. F. 1963a. Observations on the microanatomy of Crystallolithus hyalinus Gaarder & Markali. Arch. Mikrobiol, Bd. 47, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar
Manton, I. & Leedale, G. F. 1963b. Observations on the fine structure of Prymnesium parvum Carter. Arch. Mikrobiol, Vol. 45, pp.285–303.Google Scholar
Manton, I. & Parke, M. 1962. Preliminary observations on scales and their mode of origin in Chrysochromulina polylepis sp.nov. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 565–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Peterfi, L. S. 1969. Observations on the fine structure of coccoliths, scales and the protoplast of a freshwater coccolithophorid, Hymenomonas roseola Stein, with supplementary observations on the protoplast of Cricosphaera carterae. Proc. R. Soc. B., Vol. 172, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Paasche, E. & Klaveness, D. 1970. A physiological comparison of coccolith forming and naked cells of Coccolithus huxleyi. Arch. Mikrobiol, Bd. 73. pp. 143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. 1961. Some remarks concerning the class Chrysophyceae. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 2, PP. 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. 1971. The production of calcareous elements by benthic algae belonging to the class Haptophyceae (Chrysophyta). Proc. 2nd Planktonic Conf. Rome, 1970, Vol. II, pp. 929–37.Google Scholar
Parke, M. & Adams, I. 1960. The motile (Crystallolithus hyalinus Gaarder & Markali) and nonmotile phases in the life history of Coccolithus pelagicus (Wallich) Schiller. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P. S. 1968. Check-list of British marine algae - 2nd revision. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 783–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. Lund, J. W. G. Manton, I. 1962. Observations on the biology and structure of the type species of Chrysochromulina (C. parva Lackey) in the English Lake District. Arch. Mikrobiol, Bd. 42, pp. 333–52.Google Scholar
Parke, M. Manton, I. & Clarke, B. 1955. Studies on marine flagellates. II. Three new species of Chrysochromulina. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 579–609.Google Scholar
Parke, M. Manton, I. & Clarke, B. 1956. Studies on marine flagellates. III. Three further species of Chrysochromulina. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 35, pp. 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. Manton, I. & Clarke, B. 1958. Studies on marine flagellates. IV. Morphology and microanatomy of a new species of Chrysochromulina. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. Manton, I. & Clarke, B. 1959. Studies on marine flagellates. V. Morphology and microanatomy of Chrysochromulina strobilus sp.nov. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, pp. 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouchet, M. G. 1892. Sur Une Algue pelagique nouvelle. C. r. Seanc. Soc. BioL, Ser. IX, Vol. 4, pp. 34–6.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, E. G. 1955. Kleine Mitteilungen über Flagellaten und Algen. I. Algenartige Chrysophyceen in Reinkultur. Arch. Mikrobiol., Bd. 21, pp. 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, R. E. 1930. The influence of Phaeocystis on the migration of the herring. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. II, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Scherffel, A. 1899. Phaeocystis globosa n.sp. (Vorl. Mitt.). Ber. dt. hot. Ges., Bd. 17, pp. 317–18.Google Scholar
Scherffel, A. 1900. Phaeocystis globosa nov.spec. nebst einigen Betrachtungen iiber die Phylogenie niederer, insbesonderer brauner Organismen. Wiss. Meeresunters., Abt. Helgoland, Bd. 4, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Stosch, H. A. von 1955. Ein morphologischer Phasenwechsel bei einer Coccolithophoride. Naturwissenchaften, Bd. 42, 423.Google Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von 1958. Der Geisselapparat einer Coccolithophoride. Naturwissenschaften, Bd. 45, pp. 140–1.Google Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von 1967. Haptophyceae. In Vegetative Fortpflanzung, Parthogenese und Apogamie bei Algen (ed. Ruhland, W.), Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol. 18, pp. 646–656. Berlin, Göttingen and Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Veer, J. Van Der 1969. Pavlova mesolychnon (Chrysophyta), a new species from the Tamar, Estuary, Cornwall. Acta bot. neerl., Vol. 18, pp. 496–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar