Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T22:29:23.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on starfish on an Essex oyster bed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. A. Hancock
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch

Extract

In a previous paper (Hancock, 1955) an account was given of the feeding behaviour of the starfish Asterias rubens L. and the common sunstar Solaster papposus (L.) on Essex oyster beds. In discussion, it was stated that there was no evidence that, in the conditions described, a cultivated oyster ground provided a greater attraction than an uncultivated one. The present work was undertaken to provide information on this subject, and also on the movements, growth and ecological relationships of starfish. Further experiments were made on feeding behaviour, particularly of the young starfish.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, N. T. J., 1951. On estimating the size of mobile populations from recapture data. Biometrika, Vol. 38, pp. 293306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. & Powell, H. T., 1951. The growth rate of juvenile Asterias rubens L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 381–5.Google Scholar
Bull, H. O., 1934. Aquarium observations on the rate of growth and enemies of the Common Star-Fish, Asterias rubens L. Rep. Dove mar. Lab., Ser. 3, No. 2, pp. 60–3.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. C., 1914. Echinoderm larvae. Mem. Lpool mar. biol. Comm., No. 22.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Kmght-Jones, E. W., 1949. The setting behaviour of larvae of the European fiat oyster. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 139.Google Scholar
Feder, H. M. 1955. The use of vital stains in marking Pacific coast starfish. Calif. Fish Game, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 245–6.Google Scholar
Fulton, J. W., 1895. The past and present condition of the oyster beds in the Firth of Forth. Rep. Fish. Scot., No. 14, pp. 244–75.Google Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S. & Loosanoff, V. L., 1939. Natural history and method of controlling the starfish (Asterias forbesi, Desor). Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., Vol. 9, pp. 75132.Google Scholar
Gemmill, J. F., 1912. The development of the starfish Solaster endeca Forbes. Trans. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, D. A. 1954. The destruction of oyster spat by Urosalpinx cinerea (Say) on Essex oyster beds. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 20, pp. 186–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, D. A. 1955. The Feeding Behaviour Of Starfish On Essex Oyster Beds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, D. A. (in press). The biology and control of the American whelk tingle, Urosalpinx cinerea (Say), on English oyster beds.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. & Stevenson, J. P., 1950. Gregariousness during settlement in the barnacle Elminius modestus Darwin. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 281–97.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L., 1937. Use of Nile Blue Sulphate in marking starfish. Science, Vol. 85, p. 412.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L., 1953. Tagging the ‘Untaggable’. Progr. Fish Cult., Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 186–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H. & Fraser, J. H., 1930. Rate of growth of the common starfish, Asterias rubens. Nature, Lond., Vol. 126, p. 567.Google Scholar
Shelbourne, J. E., 1957. The 1951 oyster stock in the rivers Crouch and Roach, Essex, and the influence of water currents and scour on its distribution; with an account of comparative dredging experiments. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 21, No. 2.Google Scholar
Smith, G. F. M., 1940. Factors limiting distribution and size in the starfish. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 5, pp. 84103.Google Scholar
Vernon, A. A., 1937. Starfish stains. Science, Vol. 86, p. 64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vevers, H. G., 1949. The biology of Asterias rubens L.; growth and reproduction. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 165–87.Google Scholar
Waugh, G. D. & Ansell, A., 1956. The effect, on oyster spatfall, of controlling barnacle settlement with D.D.T. Ann. appl. Biol., Vol. 44, pp. 619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar