Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:16:23.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on practical methods for the study of marine diatoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

T. J. Hart
T. J. Hart
Affiliation:
National Institute of Oceanography, Wormley, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the study of marine diatoms examination of fresh material (or of wet mounts in some suitable preservative such as formalin-sea water) is essential, in addition to ‘permanent’ mounts of ‘cleaned’ frustules, because the violent cleaning process destroys many of the more delicate forms (e.g. the genus Guinardia). Conversely, it is not possible to see the fine details of skeletal structure, upon which the taxonomy of so many diatoms is based, while the organic contents of the cells are still present.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , November 1957 , pp. 593 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellido, , Caballero, Don Ernesto, 1897. In An. Soc. esp. Hist. nat. [Not seen, a subsequent Spanish ed. appeared 1926, and an English translation quoted below.]Google Scholar
Bellido, , acuteCaballero, Don Ernesto, 1927. The technique of mounting diatom and other type slides. [Communicated by Dr C. Tierney from trans, by Mr Frederick Adams.] J. R. micr. Soc, Vol. 47, pp. 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupp, E. E., 1943. Marine plankton diatoms of the West Coast of North America. Bull. Scripps Instn Oceanogr., Vol. 5, pp. 1–238.Google Scholar
Fleming, William, D., 1943. A synthetic mounting medium of high refractive index. J. R. micr. Soc, Vol. 63, pp. 34–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghazzawi, F. M., 1933. The littoral diatoms of Liverpool and Port Erin shores. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 19, pp. 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, , Peter, , 1953. The Microtomists’ Formulary and Guide. London: Constable and Co.Google Scholar
Hanna, G. D., 1949. A synthetic resin which has unusual properties. J. R. micr. Soc, Vol. 69, pp. 25–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, T. J. 1935. On the diatoms of the skin-film of whales, and their possible bearing on problems of whale movements. ‘Discovery’ Rep., Vol. 10, pp. 247–82.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. Ingram, 1938. An efficient technique for cleaning diatoms. J. R. micr. Soc, Vol. 58, pp. 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendey, N. Ingram, 1951. Littoral diatoms of Chichester Harbour with special reference to fouling. J. R. micr. Soc, Vol. 71, pp. 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hustedt, , FR., 1930. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Osterreichs und der Schweiz, Rabenhorst's Kryptogamenflora, Bd. 7, Teil 1, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hendey, , Ingram, N., 1952. Diatomeen aus der lebensgemeinshaft des Buckelwals (Megaptera nodosa Bonn). Arch. Hydrobiol., Bd. 46, pp. 286—98.Google Scholar
Jelly, Edwin E., 1930. Mounting medium for film sections. Nature, Lond., Vol. 125, p. 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, J. & Lendrum, A. C., 1939. A mounting medium for microscopical preparations, giving good preservation of colour. J. Path. Bact., Vol. 49, p. 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, , William, , 1885. Notes on experiments in mounting the Amphiplura pellucida in media having a higher refractive index than Canada balsam. J. roy. Soc, N.S.W., Vol. 19, pp. 121–33.Google Scholar