Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:27:41.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on the Regeneration of the Gill of Mytilus edulis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Extract

Experiments have shown that the gill of Mytilus is capable of regeneration, and that this may occur in less than eight months. It may be confined to the formation of a food grove at the cut edge of the gill, without appreciable regeneration in length of the gill filaments. Regeneration of a food groove appears always to occur at the cut edge, if the ends of the descending and ascending filaments are able to touch and so to fuse. On the other hand, regeneration of gill filaments does not seem to occur invariably, and when it does the rate is slow, at least under experimental conditions and in mussels of a length of about 7·0 to 8·0 cm., such as were used for the experiments: it is possible that regeneration would occur more surely and rapidly in young mussels, but owing to the thinness of the shell they would be more difficult to wedge open without fracturing. Coulthard (6, p. 136), however, says that “The rate of growth is independent of size in the mussel, being apparently influenced only by the environment.” Perhaps the lack of an abundant food supply under the conditions of the experiments should be taken into consideration, though it is well known that in general the amount of food available to an animal has little influence on regeneration (9, p. 27). The salinity of the water in general circulation is about 36–37°/oo, that is, higher than normal sea-water, which is about 35°/oo, and would be considerably higher than the optimum salinity for growth (see Flattely and Walton, 7, p. 81). This may also possibly have a retarding effect on the initiation of regeneration and the rate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

1Atkins, D.On Abnormal Conditions of the Gills in Mytilus edulis. Part I. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. Vol. XVI (N.S.), pp. 919970, 1930.Google Scholar
2Atkins, D.Part II. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. Vol. XVII (N.S.), pp. 489543, 1931.Google Scholar
3Bloomer, H. H.On some malformed specimens of Anodonta cygnea L Journ. Malacol., London, Vol. VII, pp. 136138, 1900.Google Scholar
4Bloomer, H. H.Notes on some further malformed specimens of Anodonta cygnea L Journ. Malacol., London, Vol. VII, pp. 177178, 1900.Google Scholar
5Bloomer, H. H.Notes on some further malformed specimens of Anodonta cygnea L Journ. Malacol., London, Vol. IX, p. 96, 1902.Google Scholar
6Coulthard, H. S.Growth of the Sea Mussel. Contr. Canad. Biol. and Fish. Vol. IV (N.S.), No. 10, pp. 121136, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Flattely, F. W., and Walton, C. L. The Biology of the Seashore. Sidgwick and Jackson. London. 1922.Google Scholar
8Korschelt, E.Regeneration and Transplantation. Berlin. 1927.Google Scholar
9Morgan, T. H.Regeneration. Macmillan & Co. New York and London. 1901.Google Scholar
10Pelseneer, P.Les variations et leur hérédité chez les Mollusques. Acad. Roy. Belgique. Mémoires, 2nd sér. Tome V. 1920.Google Scholar
11Poyarkoff, E.Incubation des Embryons et régénération des branchies chez les Cyclas (Sphœhrium corneum, L.), (Note préliminaire). Arch. Zoo. Exp. et Gén. 5 sér., Tome V, pp. cxxv–cxxxviii, 1910.Google Scholar
12Rice, E. L.Gill development in Mytilus. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. XIV, pp. 6177, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar