Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:30:35.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on Seabed Irradiance in Shallow Tidal Seas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D.G. Bowers
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, LL59 5EY.
P. Tett
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Napier University, 10 Collington Road, Edinburgh, EH10 5DT.
A.W. Walne
Affiliation:
Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB

Extract

(1) The tidal cycle and that of solar elevation interact to produce patterns in seabed irradiance during the day which change over the springs-neaps cycle. In locations where high water springs is at midday, there is a single peak in seabed irradiance in the middle of the day at neap tides and two peaks in seabed irradiance (one in the morning, the other in the evening) at spring tides.

(2) These cycles also interact to produce a springs–neaps cycle of daily mean irradiance, which is relevant to the growth of benthic algae. The pattern of this cycle will also vary from place to place. In locations where low water springs is in the middle of the day the pattern is straightforward: maximum daily irradiance always occurs at spring tides. However, where high water springs is in the middle of the day, the cycle can reverse as the days get longer. The timing of the switch in the cycle depends upon the water clarity.

(3) Variations in attenuation over the springs–neaps cycle will also be important. In the Menai Strait, a springs–neaps cycle in K is often (but not always) observed, higher attenuations occurring at spring tides when seabed sediments are stirred up by the stronger tidal currents. This will reduce seabed irradiance at spring tides and tend to favour greater irradiance at neaps. In our model runs, K was kept constant because at present it is difficult to predict these changes. However, in our observations there is evidence of greater seabed irradiance at neap tides associated with greater water clarity. Variations in cloud cover during the day can also affect the regular cycles predicted by the model.

The authors are grateful to Professor Ernest Naylor for encouragement and for information on animal behaviour and light. Members of the Marine Optics Group at Menai Bridge helped with the sampling during the experimental work in July 1994.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kirk, J.T.O., 1994. Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, E., 1982. Tidal and lunar rhythms in animals and plants. In Biological timekeeping (ed. J., Brady), pp. 3348. Cambridge University Press. [Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series, no. 14.]Google Scholar
Pingree, R.D. & Griffiths, D.K., 1981. S2 tidal simulations on the north-west European shelf. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 609—616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topliss, B.J., Hunter, J.R. & Simpson, J.H., 1980. Simultaneous measurements of transparency and irradiance in the coastal waters of North Wales. Marine Environmental Research, 4, 6579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar