Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:28:24.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new species of Triptolemma (Porifera: Pachastrellidae) from the Pacific Ocean with a revision of the genus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2010

Marco Bertolino ,
D. Pica ,
G. Bavestrello ,
N. Iwasaki  and
B. Calcinai
Marco Bertolino*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze del Mare, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131, Ancona, Italy
D. Pica
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze del Mare, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131, Ancona, Italy
G. Bavestrello
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze del Mare, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131, Ancona, Italy
N. Iwasaki
Affiliation:
Usa Marine Biological Institute, Kochi University, Japan
B. Calcinai
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze del Mare, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131, Ancona, Italy
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Bertolino, Dipartimento di Scienze del Mare, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131, Ancona, Italy email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species, T. strongylata sp. nov. is described on the basis of material collected from the Pacific Ocean. The new species is characterized by the presence of sinuous strongyles. Moreover the incomplete description of T. simplex (Sarà, 1959) is implemented on the basis of new abundant material allowing, for the first time, the complete description of the skeleton of a Triptolemma species and the detecting of the presence of monaxonic spicules in the spicular complement of the genus. The skeleton is composed of a thick crust of disorderly arranged mesotriaenes and scattered microscleres, supported by diverging spicule tracts formed by oxeas towards the surface. Both species were recorded associated to boring sponges (Spiroxya and Cliona) in excavations of the calcareous scleraxis of precious corals or in organogenic concretions. In the cavities where the tissue of Triptolemma was recorded the wall of the excavation partially lost its typical pattern characterized by ovoid scars and became irregularly eroded. Our hypothesis is that Triptolemma insinuates inside the erosions produced by other sponges and it is able to enlarge them by an etching mechanism based on chemical dissolution only.

Keywords

DemospongiaeTriptolemmaboring spongesnew speciesprecious coralcoralligenous
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 91 , Special Issue 2: Biodiversity and Taxonomy , March 2011 , pp. 329 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borchiellini, C., Alivon, E. and Vacelet, J. (2003) The systematic position of Alectona (Porifera, Demospongiae): a tetractinellid sponge. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell'Università di Genova 68, 209–217.Google Scholar
Calcinai, B., Cerrano, C., Sarà, M. and Bavestrello, G. (2000) Boring sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae) from the Indian Ocean. Italian Journal of Zoology 67, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcinai, B., Bavestrello, G., Cerrano, C. and Sara, M. (2001) Boring sponges living into precious corals from the Pacific Ocean. Italian Journal of Zoology 68, 2, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcinai, B., Arillo, A., Cerrano, C. and Bavestrello, G. (2003) Taxonomy-related differences in the excavating micro-patterns of boring sponges. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcinai, B., Azzini, F., Bavestrello, G., Iwasaki, N. and Cerrano, C. (2004a) Redescription of Alectona verticillata (Johnston) (Porifera, Alectonidae) boring in to Japanese precious coral. Italian Journal of Zoology 71, 337–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcinai, B., Bavestrello, G. and Cerrano, C. (2004b) Bioerosion micro-patterns as diagnostic characteristics in boring sponges. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell'Università di Genova 68, 229–238.Google Scholar
Calcinai, B., Cerrano, C. and Bavestrello, G. (2007) Three new species and one re-description of Aka. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 1355–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcinai, B., Cerrano, C., Iwasaki, N. and Bavestrello, G. (2008) Sponges boring into precious corals: an overview with description of a new species of Alectona (Demospongiae, Alectonidae) and a worldwide identification key for the genus. Marine Ecology: an Evolutionary Perspective 29, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H.J. (1876) Descriptions and figures of deep-sea sponges and their spicules, from the Atlantic Ocean, dredged up on board H.M.S. ‘Porcupine’, chiefly in 1869 (concluded). Annals and Magazine of Natural History 18(105) 226–240; (106): 307–324; (107): 388–410; (108): 458–479, pls XII–XVI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H.J. (1880) Report on specimens dredged up from the Gulf of Manaar and presented to the Liverpool Free Museum by Capt. W.H. Cawne Warren. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6: 35–61, pls IV–VI; 129–156, pls VII, VIII.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J.N.A. (2000) ‘Sponguide’. Guide to sponge collection and identification. http://www.qm.qld.gov.au/organisation/sections/SessileMarineInvertebrates/spong.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R. (1903) Descriptions of South African sponges. Part II. Marine Investigations in South Africa 2, 171–180, pl. IV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi, C. and Lévi, P. (1983) Éponges Tétractinellides et Lithistides hathyales de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 4° sér., 5, section A, 1, 101–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, M. (2002) Family Pachastrellidae Carter, 1875. In Hooper, J.N.A. and van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. Volume 1. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nava, H. and Carballo, J.L. (2008) Chemical and mechanical bioerosion of boring sponges from Mexican Pacific coral reefs. Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2827–2831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pansini, M. and Pronzato, R. (1973) Il coralligeno di Bogliasco ed il suo popolamento di poriferi. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell'Università di Genova 41, 5–34.Google Scholar
Pansini, M. and Pronzato, R. (1982) Distribuzione ed ecologia dei Poriferi nella grotta di Mitigliano (Penisola sorrentina). Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell'Università di Genova 50, 287–293.Google Scholar
Pomponi, S.A. (1977) Excavation of calcium carbonate substrates by boring sponges: ultrastructures and cytochemistry. A dissertation. University of Miami, Florida, 133 pp.Google Scholar
Rützler, K. (1978) Sponges in coral reefs. In Stoddart, D.R. and Johannes, R.E. (eds) Coral reefs: research methods, monographs on oceanographic methodology 5. Paris: Unesco, pp. 299–313.Google Scholar
Rützler, K. and Rieger, G. (1973) Sponge burrowing: fine structure of Cliona lampa penetrating calcareous substrata. Marine Biology 21, 144–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarà, M. (1959) Specie nuove di Demospongie provenienti da acque superficiali del Golfo di Napoli. Annuario dell'Istituto e Museo di Zoologia dell'Università di Napoli 11, 1–22, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Sarà, M., Balduzzi, A., Boero, F., Pansini, M., Pessani, D. and Pronzato, R. (1978) Analisi di un popolamentobentonico di falesia del Promontorio di Portofino: dati preliminari. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell'Università di Genova 46, 119–137.Google Scholar
Schönberg, C.H.L. and Tapanila, L. (2006) The bioeroding sponge Aka paratypica, a modern tracemarking analogue for the Paleozoic ichnogenus Entobia devonica. Ichnos 13, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M., Hooper, J.N.A. and Hiemstra, H. (1991) Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the marine sponge genus Acarnus (Porifera: Poecilosclerida). Beaufortia 42, 49–88.Google Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M. and Hooper, J.N.A. (2002) Family Samidae Sollas, 1888. In Hooper, J.N.A. and van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. Volume 1. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M. (2009) New sciophilous sponges from the Caribbean (Porifera: Demospongiae). Zootaxa 2107, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollas, W.J. (1888) Report on the Tetractinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger, during the years 1873–1876. Report on the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, 1873–1876. Zoology 25, 1–458, pls I–XLIV, 1 map.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.A. (1973) Marine demospongiae of Mahe Island in the Seychelles Bank. Annales du Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale. Série in 8vo. Sciences zoologiques 203, 1–96, pls 1–8.Google Scholar
Zundelevich, A., Lazar, B. and Ilan, M. (2007) Chemical versus mechanical bioerosion of coral reefs by boring sponges—lessons from Pione cf. vastifica. Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed