Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:14:36.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New species of the scale worm genus Pholoides (Polychaeta: Sigalionidae) from south-east Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2014

Nathalia Padovanni  and
Antonia Cecília Zacagnini Amaral
Nathalia Padovanni*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, CP6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas—UNICAMP, 13083-862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
Antonia Cecília Zacagnini Amaral
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, CP6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas—UNICAMP, 13083-862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: N. Padovanni, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, CP6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas—UNICAMP, 13083-862 Campinas, SP, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species of scale worm, Pholoides brasiliensis sp. nov., belonging to the family Sigalionidae, has been found in Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo States, south-east Brazil. The new species is mainly characterized by a long papilla in the subdistal region of the neuropodia and a prominent papilla on the ventral side of the tentaculophore. Pholoides remains species-poor compared to most Sigalionidae genera, and currently comprises four species.

Keywords

scale wormsSigalionidaenew speciestaxonomyBrazilian coastsublittoral zone
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 94 , Issue 8 , December 2014 , pp. 1587 - 1595
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amaral, A.C.Z., Lana, P.C., Fernandes, F.C. and Coimbra, J.C. (2004) Caracterização do ambiente e da macrofauna bentônica. In Amaral, A.C.Z. and Rossi-Wongtschowski, C.L.D.B. (eds) Biodiversidade bentônica das regiões sudeste e sul do Brasil – Plataforma Externa e Talude Superior. Série documentos REVIZEE, São Paulo: Score Sul, Instituto Oceanográfico da USP, pp. 11–44.Google Scholar
Barnich, R. and Fiege, D. (2003) The Aphroditoidea (Annelida, Polychaeta) of the Mediterranean Sea. Frankfurt: Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 170 pp.Google Scholar
Blake, J.A. (1995a) Family Pholoidae Kinberg, 1858. In Blake, J.A., Hilbig, B. and Scott, P.H. (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. The Annelida Part 2. Polychaeta: Phyllodocida (Syllidae and scale-bearing families), Amphinomida and Eunicida. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, pp. 175–188.Google Scholar
Blake, J.A. (1995b) Family Sigalionidae Kinberg, 1856. In Blake, J.A., Hilbig, B. and Scott, P.H. (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. The Annelida Part 2. Polychaeta: Phyllodocida (Syllidae and scale-bearing families), Amphinomida and Eunicida. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, pp. 189–206.Google Scholar
Darboux, J.C. (1900) Recherches sur les Aphroditiens. Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Beligique 33, 1–274.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. (1977) The polychaete worms. Definition and keys to the orders, families and genera. Volume 28. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Science Series, 188 pp.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1959) Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world, Part I. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications Occasional Paper 23, 1–353.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1968) Atlas of the errant kite polychaetous annelids from California. Los Angeles, CA: Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California. 828 pp.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. and Fauchald, K. (1971) Deep-water benthic polychaetous annelids off New England to Bermuda, and other North Atlantic areas, Part II. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology 6, 1–327.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1962) Zweiter Beitrag zur Polychaetenfauna von Peru. Kieler Meeresforschungen 18, 109–147.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1965) Zur Kenntnis des sublitorals der chilenischen Kusteunter besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Polychaeten und Osiracoden, Part II: Die Polychaeten des sublitorals. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institul 62, 59–305.Google Scholar
Hutchings, P. and Murray, A. (1984) Taxonomy of polychaetes from the Hawkesbury River and the southern estuaries of New South Wales, Australia. Records of the Australian Museum Supplement 3, 1–119.Google Scholar
Hutchings, P.A. (2000) Family Sigalionidae. In Beesley, P.L., Ross, G.J.B. and Glasby, C.J. (eds) Polychaetes and allies: the southern synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Polychaeta, Myzoztomida, Pogonophora, Echiura, Sipuncula. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 157–160.Google Scholar
Imajima, M. (2003) Polychaetous annelids from Sagami Bay and Sagami Sea collected by the Emperor Showa of Japan and deposited at the Showa Memorial Institute, National Science Museum, Tokyo (II), orders included within the Phyllodocida, Amphinomida, Spintherida and Eunicida. National Science Museum Monographs 23, 1–221.Google Scholar
Johnson, H.P. (1897) A preliminary account of the marine annelids of the Pacific coast, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Series 3 1, 153–199.Google Scholar
Marenzeller, E. von (1893) Berichte der Commission für Oceanographische erforschung des Östlichen mittelmeeres. Zweite Reihe. VI. Zoologische Ergebnisse II. Polychäten des Grundes, gesammelt 1890, 1891, 1892. Denkschriften der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 60, 25–48.Google Scholar
Norlinder, E., Nygren, A., Wiklund, H. and Pleijel, F. (2012) Phylogeny of scale-worms (Aphroditiformia, Annelida), assessed from 18SrRNA, 28SrRNA, 16SrRNA, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 65, 490–500.Google Scholar
Pettibone, M.H. (1970) Revision of some species referred to Leanira Kinberg (Polychaeta, Sigalionidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 53, 1–25.Google Scholar
Pettibone, M.H. (1982) Classification of Polychaeta. In Parker, S.P. (ed.). Synopsis and classification of living organisms. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Pettibone, M.H. (1992) Contribution to the polychaeta family Pholoidae Kinberg. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 532, 1–24.Google Scholar
Pruvot, G. (1895) Coup d'oeuil sur la distribution générale des invertébrés dans la région de Banyuls (Golfed du Lion). Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale (Paris), série 3 2, 629–658.Google Scholar
Read, G. and Fauchald, K. (2013) Pholoides. Pruvot, 1895. In Read G. and Fauchald K. (eds) World Polychaeta database: World Register of Marine Species. Available from http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129440 (accessed 2 April 2013).Google Scholar
Rouse, G.W. and Pleijel, F. (2001) Polychaetes. New York: Oxford University Press, 354 pp.Google Scholar