Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:30:32.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New species of Microscleroderma and Amphibleptula (Demospongiae, Tetractinellida, Scleritodermidae) from two contrasting marine environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2021

Patricia Gómez Open the ORCID record for Patricia Gómez [Opens in a new window] ,
Fernando Calderón-Gutiérrez Open the ORCID record for Fernando Calderón-Gutiérrez [Opens in a new window] ,
Carlos González-Gándara  and
María De Los Angeles Rojas-Terán
Patricia Gómez*
Affiliation:
Unidad Académica Ecología y Biodiversidad Acuática, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Ext. S/N Cd. Universitaria C.P. 04510, CDMX, Mexico
Fernando Calderón-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA
Carlos González-Gándara
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Arrecifes Coralinos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Veracruzana, Carr. Tuxpan-Tampico km 7.5, Col. Universitaria, CP 92860, Tuxpan, Veracruz, Mexico
María De Los Angeles Rojas-Terán
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Arrecifes Coralinos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Veracruzana, Carr. Tuxpan-Tampico km 7.5, Col. Universitaria, CP 92860, Tuxpan, Veracruz, Mexico
*
Author for correspondence: Patricia Gómez, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We record for the first time a nominal species of the genus Microscleroderma in the Western Atlantic, and the first record of the genus Amphibleptula in Mexico. Two new species of ‘lithistid’ Tetractinellida are described: Microscleroderma mexica sp. nov. from crevices of two reefs in Veracruz, Mexico, and Amphibleptula aaktun sp. nov. from the anchialine cave El Aerolito, Cozumel Island, Mexico. Microscleroderma mexica sp. nov. is characterized by its tubular and cup-shaped to wavy laminar habitus, hirsute surface and two size categories of oxea diactines. Amphibleptula aaktun sp. nov. is characterized by its ficiform or lobular habitus with an exhalant area at the flat top of the body, divided into numerous vertical septa-like structures; its desmas have thinner epirhabds, and thinner oxea than those of Amphibleptula madrepora. This is the second species of Amphibleptula that has been described; hence, we propose the redefinition of the genus. Both species described have a shallow distribution (≤21 m depth); they are differentiated from each other by the disjunction between their habitats as well as by their morphology.

Keywords

Biodiversitycavity-dwellingdesmaslithistidMexiconew speciesPoriferastygobite
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 101 , Issue 2 , March 2021 , pp. 241 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcolado, P (2002) Catálogo de las esponjas de Cuba. Avicenia 15, 53–72.Google Scholar
Bergquist, PR and Hogg, JJ (1969) Free amino acid patterns in Demospongiae: a biogeochemical approach to sponge classification. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 10, 205–220.Google Scholar
Calderón-Gutiérrez, F, Solís-Marín, FA, Gómez, P, Sánchez, C, Hernández-Alcántara, P, Álvarez-Noguera, F and Yáñez-Mendoza, G (2017) Mexican Anchialine fauna – with emphasis in the high biodiversity cave El Aerolito. Regional Studies in Marine Science 9, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderón-Gutiérrez, F, Sánchez-Ortiz, CA and Huato-Soberanis, L (2018) Ecological patterns in anchialine caves. PLoS ONE 13, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cárdenas, P, Pérez, T and Boury-Esnault, N (2012) Sponge systematics facing new challenges. Advances in Marine Biology 61, 79–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmona-Islas, C, Morales-García, A, Hernández-Mendiola, A, Gama-Villasana, H and Colmenares-Campos, C (2019) Invertebrados bentónicos en diez arrecifes del Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 90, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Cruz-Francisco, V and González-González, M (2016) Nuevos registros de esponjas para el sistema arrecifal Lobos-Tuxpan, con ampliaciones de ámbito de distribución para el Golfo de México. Boletín del Instituto Oceanográfico de Venezuela 55, 51–59.Google Scholar
De la Cruz-Francisco, V, Argüelles, J, Rodríguez-Muñoz, S, León-Méndez, G and Duran-López, D (2019) Primer registro de Amorphinopsis atlantica Carvalho Hadju, Mothes & Van Soest, 2004 (Familia: Halichondriidae) para un sistema lagunar del Golfo de México. Revista Ciencias Marinas y Costeras 11, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendy, A (1905) Report on the sponges collected by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. Report to the Government of Ceylon on the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar 3(suppl. 18), 57–246.Google Scholar
Döderlein, L (1884) Studien an Japanischen Lithistiden. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 40, 62–104.Google Scholar
Ellis, J and Solander, D (1786) The Natural History of Many Curious and Uncommon Zoophytes, Collected From Various Parts of the Globe. Systematically Arranged and Described by the Late Daniel Solander. London: Benjamin White & Son.Google Scholar
Gómez, P (1998) First record and new species of Gastrophanella (Porifera: Demospongiae: Lithistida) from the central East Pacific. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 111, 774–780.Google Scholar
Gómez, P (2002) Esponjas Marinas del Golfo de México y el Caribe. AGT Editor, S. A. México.Google Scholar
Gómez, P (2007) Inventario de las esponjas del Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano, con nuevos registros de especies (Porifera: Demospongiae). In Granados-Barba, A, Abarca-Arenas, LG and Vargas-Hernández, JM (eds), Investigaciones Científicas en el Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano. Campeche: Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
Gómez, P and Green, G (1984) Sistemática de las esponjas marinas de Puerto Morelos, Quintana Roo, México. Anales del Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 11, 65–90.Google Scholar
Gómez, P and Calderón-Gutiérrez, F (2020) Anchialine cave-dwelling sponge fauna (Porifera) from La Quebrada, Mexico, with the description of the first Mexican stygobiont sponges. Zootaxa 4803, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, BC, Martínez, A, Borda, E, Iliffe, TM, Fontaneto, D and Worsaae, K (2017) Genetic spatial structure of an anchialine cave annelid indicates connectivity within – but not between – islands of the Great Bahama Bank. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 109, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Gándara, C (2020) La comunidad de corales escleractineos del sistema arrecifal Palo Seco, Veracruz, México. In Pérez-Morales, A, Ake-Castillo, JA, Álvarez-González, CA and Poot-Delgado, CA (eds), Investigaciones Marinas en el Golfo de México y Mar Caribe Mexicano. Colima: Universidad de Colima, pp. 191–209.Google Scholar
González-Gándara, C, Patiño-García, A, Asís-Anastasio, U, Serrano, A and Gómez, P (2009) Lista de las esponjas marinas asociadas al arrecife Tuxpan, Veracruz, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 80, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Gándara, C, Solís-Marín, AF, De La Cruz-Francisco, V, Granados-Barba, A, Salas-Pérez, JJ, Argüelles-Jiménez, J and Escárcega-Quiroga, PA (2015) Riqueza y distribución de equinodermos en los arrecifes del norte y sur de Veracruz, México. Revista de Biología Tropical 63, 183–193.Google Scholar
Green, G (1977) Sinopsis taxonómica de 13 especies de esponjas del Arrecife La Blanquilla, Veracruz, México. Anales del Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 4, 79–98.Google Scholar
Green, G, Fuentes, L and Gómez, P (1986) Nuevos registros de Porifera del Arrecife La Blanquilla, Veracruz, México. Anales del Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 13, 127–146.Google Scholar
Hajdu, E and Lopes, DA (2007) Checklist of Brazilian deep-sea sponges. In Custódio, MR, Lobo-Hajdu, G, Hajdu, E and Muricy, G (eds), Porifera Research: Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, pp. 353–359.Google Scholar
Hart, CW, Manning, RB and Iliffe, TM (1985) The fauna of Atlantic marine caves: evidence of dispersal by sea floor spreading while maintaining ties to deep waters. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 98, 288–292.Google Scholar
Hartman, WD (1955) A collection of sponges from the west coast of the Yucatán Península with descriptions of two new species. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean 5, 161–189.Google Scholar
Hill, MS, Hill, AL, Lopez, J, Peterson, KJ, Pomponi, SA, Diaz, MC, Thacker, RW, Adamska, M, Boury-Esnault, N, Cárdenas, P, Chaves-Fonnegra, A, Danka, E, De Laine, B, Formica, D, Hajdu, E, Lobo-Hajdu, G, Klontz, S, Morrow, C, Patel, J, Picton, B, Pisani, D, Pohlmann, D, Redmond, NE, Reed, J, Richey, S, Riesgo, A, Rubin, E, Russell, Z, Rützler, K, Sperling, EA, di Stefano, M, Tarver, JE and Collin, AG (2013) Reconstruction of family-level phylogenetic relationships within Demospongiae (Porifera) using nuclear encoded housekeeping genes. PLoS ONE 8, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iliffe, TM, Kvitek, R, Blasco, S, Blasco, K and Covill, R (2011) Search for Bermuda's deep-water caves. Hydrobiologia 677, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M (2007) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Porifera: Lithistid Demospongiae (rock sponges). NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 121, 1–100.Google Scholar
Kelly, M and Cárdenas, P (2016) An unprecedented new genus and family of Tetractinellida (Porifera, Demospongiae) from New Zealand's Colville Ridge, with a new type of mitochondrial group I intron. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R (1903) Descriptions of South African sponges. Part II. Marine Investigations in South Africa 2, 171–180.Google Scholar
Kobluk, DR and Van Soest, RWM (1989) Cavity dwelling sponges in a southern Caribbean coral reef and their paleontological implications. Bulletin of Marine Science 44, 1207–1235.Google Scholar
Lévi, C (1960) Spongiaires des côtes Occidentales Africaines. Bulletin de l'Intitute Français d'Afrique noire (A, Sciences naturelles) 22, 743–769.Google Scholar
Lévi, C and Lévi, P (1983) Éponges Tétractinellides et Lithistides bathyales de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris IV Sér 5, 101–168.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C (1758) Systema Naturae. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Maas-Vargas, M (1994) Inventario de las esponjas marinas (Porifera: Demospongiae) de la colección de referencia de bentos costeros de ECOSUR. Universidad y Ciencia 20, 23–28.Google Scholar
Macintyre, IG, Rützler, K, Norris, JN and Fauchald, K (1982) A submarine cave near Columbus Cay, a bizarre cryptic habitat. In Rützler, K and Macintyre, IG (eds), The Atlantic Barrier Reef Ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize I: Structure and Communities, Vol. 12. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences, pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
Marshall, W (1876) Ideen über der verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Hexactinelliden. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 27, 113–136.Google Scholar
Moldovan, O, Kováč, L and Halse, S (2018) Cave Ecology. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, CC and Cárdenas, P (2015) Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera). Frontiers in Zoology 12, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, CC, Redmond, NE, Picton, BE, Thacker, RW, Collins, AG, Maggs, CA, Sigwart, JD and Allcock, AL (2013) Molecular phylogenies support homoplasy of multiple morphological characters used in the taxonomy of Heteroscleromorpha (Porifera, Demospongiae). Integrative and Comparative Biology 53, 428–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muricy, G and Minervino, JV (2000) A new species of Gastrophanella from central western Atlantic, with a discussion of the family Siphonidiidae (Demospongiae: Lithistida). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, T, Vacelet, J, Bitar, G and Zibrowius, H (2004) Two new lithistids (Porifera: Demospongiae) from a shallow Mediterranean cave (Lebanon). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisera, A (1999) Post Paleozoic history of the siliceous sponges with rigid skeleton. Memoir of the Queensland Museum 44, 463–472.Google Scholar
Pisera, A and Lévi, C (2002) “Lithistid” Demospongiae. In Hooper, JNA and Van Soest, RWM (eds), Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, pp. 299–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisera, A and Pomponi, SA (2015) New data on lithistid sponges from the deep Florida shelf with description of a new species of Theonella. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 95, 1297–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomponi, SA, Kelly, M, Reed, JK and Wright, AE (2001) Diversity and bathymetric distribution of lithistid sponges in the tropical western Atlantic region. Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington 10, 344–353.Google Scholar
Pomponi, SA, Diaz, MC, Van Soest, RWM, Bell, LJ, Busutil, L, Gochfeld, DJ, Kelly, M and Slattery, M (2019) Sponges. In Loya, Y, Puglise, KA and Bridge, TCL (eds), Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems. Cham: Springer, pp. 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rützler, K, Piantoni, C, Van Soest, RWM and Díaz, MC (2014) Diversity of sponges (Porifera) from cryptic habitats on the Belize barrier reef near Carrie Bow Cay. Zootaxa 3805, 1–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas-Pérez, JJ, Ocaña Valencia, AN and González-Gándara, C (2015) Temperatura superficial del mar y concentración de Clorofila-a en zonas arrecifales y desembocadura de sus ríos en el Golfo de México Occidental. In Granados-Barba, A, Ortiz-Lozano, LD, Salas-Monreal, D and González-Gándara, C (eds), Investigaciones Científicas en el Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano. Hacia el corredor arrecifal del suroeste del Golfo de México. México: Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, pp. 315–332.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O (1870) Grundzüge Einer Spongien-Fauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, iii–iv, 1–8.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O (1879) Die spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico (und des Caraibischen Meeres). Abtheilung Lithistiden I. Heft. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O (1880) Die Spongien des Meerbunsen von Mexico (und des caraibischen Meeres). Abtheilung III Tetractinelliden. Monactinelliden und anhang. Nachträge zu Abtheilung I (Lithistiden). In Reports on the Dredging under the Supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, by the USCSS Blake. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 33–90.Google Scholar
Schuster, A, Erpenbeck, D, Pisera, A, Hooper, JNA, Bryce, M, Fromont, J and Wörheide, G (2015) Deceptive desmas: molecular phylogenetics suggests a new classification and uncovers convergent evolution of lithistid demosponges. PLoS ONE 10, e116038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuster, A, Lopez, JV, Becking, LE, Kelly, M, Pomponi, SA, Wörheide, G, Erpenbeck, D and Cárdenas, P (2017) Evolution of group I introns in Porifera: new evidence for intron mobility and implications for DNA barcoding. BMC Evolutionary Biology 17, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollas, WJ (1885) A classification of the sponges. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society (New Series) 5, 112.Google Scholar
Sollas, WJ (1888) Report on the Tetractinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, Zoology 25(63), 458 pp.Google Scholar
Sponge Barcoding Project. (2020) Sponge barcoding database. Available at https://www.spongebarcoding.org/sponge-barcoding-database.php (accessed 9 October 2020).Google Scholar
Topsent, E (1889) Quelques spongiaires du Banc de Campêche et de la Pointe-a-Pitre. Mémoires de la Societé Zoologique de France 2, 30–52.Google Scholar
Ugalde, D, Gómez, P and Simoes, FN (2015) Marine sponges (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Gulf of México, new records and redescription of Erylus trisphaerus (de Laubenfels, 1953). Zootaxa 3911, 151–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vacelet, J (1996) Deep-sea sponges in a Mediterranean cave. Biosystematics and Ecology Series 11, 299–312.Google Scholar
Van Soest, RWM (2017) Sponges of the Guyana Shelf. Zootaxa 4217, 1–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, RWM and Zea, S (1986) A new sublithistid sponge Monanthus ciocalyptoides n. sp. (Porifera, Halichondrida) from the West Indian region. Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum, Universiteit van Amsterdam 10, 201–205.Google Scholar
Van Soest, RWM and Stentoft, N (1988) Barbados deep-water sponges. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands 70(122), 1–175.Google Scholar
Van Soest, RWM and Hajdu, E (2000) New species of Desmanthus (Porifera, Demospongiae) with a discussion of its ordinal relationships. Zoosystema 22, 299–312.Google Scholar
Van Soest, RWM, Meesters, EH and Becking, LE (2014) Deep-water sponges (Porifera) from Bonaire and Klein Curaçao, Southern Caribbean. Zootaxa 3878, 401–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, RWM, Boury-Esnault, N, Hooper, JNA, Rützler, K, de Voogd, NJ, Alvarez, B, Hajdu, E, Pisera, AB, Manconi, R, Schöenberg, C, Klautau, M, Kelly, M, Vacelet, J, Dohrmann, M, Díaz, MC, Cárdenas, P, Carballo, JL, Ríos, P, Downey, R and Morrow, C (2020) World Porifera Database. Accessed at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera on 9 July 2020.Google Scholar
von Lendenfeld, R (1903) Porifera, Tetraxonia. In Schulze, FE (ed.), Das Tierreich. Berlin: Friedländer und Sohn, pp. 1–168.Google Scholar
Wong-Chang, I and Barrera-Escorcia, G (2005) Estado actual de la contaminación microbiológica en el Golfo de México. In Botello, AV, Rendón-von Osten, J, Gold-Bouchot, G and Agraz-Hernández, C (eds), Golfo de México Contaminación e Impacto Ambiental: Diagnóstico y Tendencias, 2nd Edn. Campeche: Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, pp. 487–504.Google Scholar
Zea, S (1987) Esponjas del Caribe Colombiano. Bogotá: Catálogo Científico.Google Scholar
Zittel, KA (1878) Studien über fossile Spongien. II. Lithistidae. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Königlich-Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 13, 65–154, Pl. I-X.Google Scholar