Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T16:42:59.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Observations on the Distribution and Morphology of the Amphipod, Gammarus Zaddachi Sexton, With Notes on Related Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Sven G. Segerstråle
Sven G. Segerstråle
Affiliation:
From the Zoological Museum of the University and the Laboratorium Hydrobiologicum Soc. Scient. Fennicae, Helsinki-Helsingfors, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As is well known, the species Gammarus zaddachi, established by E. W. Sexton in 1912 on material from European brackish and fresh-water localities, has caused great confusion among zoologists, as the characteristics distinguishing it from various related species, particularly Gammarus locusta, G. duebeni and G. pulex, have been very frequently disregarded. This confusion still persists to-day—that is amply shown by the material received for the present investigations from various museums.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , November 1947 , pp. 219 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blegvad, H., 1922. On the biology of some Danish gammarids and mysids. Rep. Dan. Biol. Sta., Vol. 28, pp. 1–103.Google Scholar
Dahl, E., 1944. The Swedish brackish water Malacostraca. Kungl. Fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förhandl., Bd. 14, Nr. 9, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Dementieva, T., 1931. On the variability of the Amphipoda of the northern seas. Trans. Oceanogr. Inst. Moscow, Vol. 1, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Gurjanova, E., 1930. Beiträge zur Fauna der Crustacea-Malacostraca des arktischen Gebietes. Zool. Anz., Bd. 86, pp. 231–48.Google Scholar
Hellén, W., 1919. Zur Kenntnis der Amphipoden-Fauna Finnlands.Medd. Soc. Fauna Flora Fennica, Bd. 45.Google Scholar
Hoek, P. P. C., 1889. Crustacea Neerlandica. II. Tijdschr. Nederl. Dierk. Vereen., Ser.2, D. II, pp. 170–234.Google Scholar
Höfken, U., 1937. Statistische und experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Variabilität von Gammarus locusta (L.). Kieler Meeresforsch., Bd. II, pp. 116–48.Google Scholar
Liljeborg, V., 1855. Öfversigt af de inom Skandinavien hittills funna arterna af slägtet Gammarus Fabr. Kongl. Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. för är 1853. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1745. Carl. Linnaei Ölandska och Gothlandska Resa, etc. Stockholm och Upsala.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1761. Fauna Suecica. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lucks, R., 1937. Die Crustaceen und Rotatorien des Messinasees. Ber. Westpreuss. Bot. Zool. Ver. Danzig, Bd. 59, pp. 59–101.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H., 1840. Histoire naturelle des crustacées, T. III. Paris.Google Scholar
Oldevig, H., 1933. Sveriges amphipoder. Göteborgs Kungl. Vetensk.-och Vitterh. Samh. Handl., Femte följden, Ser. B, Bd. 3, pp. 197–9.Google Scholar
Palmer, R., 1933. Notes on Gammarus zaddachi Sexton from Essex, with observations on eye-variations in this species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser.10, Vol. XI, pp. 64–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1932. On a collection of Gammarus from the waters south of Sealand. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk naturh. Foren. Kjöbenhavn, Bd.94, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1933–1936. Malacostraca og Cirripedia. In Ringköbing Fjords Naturhistorie i Brakvandsperioden 1915–1931. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1939. Gammarus sarsi sp. n. (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. II, Vol. X, pp. 281–5.Google Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1945. Gammarus ochlos (nom. nov.), Crustacea, Amphipoda. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. II, Vol. 12, pp. 637–8.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, A., 1934. Zur Amphipodenfauna der Kieler Bucht. Schr. Naturwiss. Ver. Schleswig-Holstein, Bd. 2, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, A., 1942. Flohkrebse oder Amphipoda. In Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile. Jena.Google Scholar
Schijfsma, K., 1931. Amphipoda van de Zuiderzee (1927–1929). In De Biologie van de Zuiderzee tijdens haar drooglegging. Meded. van de Zuiderzee-Commissie, Nr.3. Den Helder.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, S. G., 1933. Studien über die Bodentierwelt in südfinnländischen Küstengewässern. II. Übersicht über die Bodentierwelt, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Produktionsverhältnisse. Soc. Scient. Fennica, Comment. Biol., IV, No. 9, 79 pp.Google Scholar
Segerstrale, S. G., 1944 Weitere Studien über die Tierwelt der Fucus-Vegetation an der Südküste Finnlands. Soc. Scient. Fennica, Comment. Biol., IX, No. 4.Google Scholar
Segerstrale, S. G., 1946. On the occurrence of the amphipod, Gammarus duebeni Lillj. in Finland, with notes on the ecology of the species. Soc. Scient. Fennica, Comment. Biol., IX, No. 18, 22 pp.Google Scholar
Serventy, D. L., 1935. Observations on Gammarus zaddachi Sexton, an estuarine amphipod, and associated forms. Internat. Rev. gesamt. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Bd. 32, pp. 285–94.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1912. Some brackish-water Amphipoda from the mouths of the Weser and the Elbe, and from the Baltic. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1912, pp. 656–65.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1913. On a collection of Gammarus from the Königsberg Museum. Schr. Phys. ökon. Ges. z. Königsberg i. Pr., Bd. 54, pp. 90–4.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1939 On a new species of Gammarus (G. tigrinus) from Droitwich district. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIII, pp. 543–51.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1942. The relation of Gammarus zaddachi Sexton to some other species of Gammarus occurring in fresh, estuarine and marine waters. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXV, pp. 575–606.Google Scholar
Spooner, G. M., 1947. The distribution of Gammarus species in estuaries. Part I. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVII, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1917. On a collection of Gammarus from Randers Fjord, Denmark. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren., Bd. 68 pp.37–50.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1927. Revideret Fortegnelse over Danmarks Arter af Amphipoda (3. Del: Gammaridea: Fam. Gammaridae til Fam. Podoceridae (Dulichiidae aut.); Caprellidae). Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren., Bd. 84, pp. 115–20.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1928. Tanglopper (Amfipoder). In Danmarks Fauna. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1929. Amphipoda. In Die Tierwelt der Nord und Ostsee, Lief. XIV, Teil X f.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1940. The Amphipoda of N. Norway and Spitsbergen with adjacent waters. Tromsö Museums Skr., Vol. III, pp. 279–362.Google Scholar
Suomalainen, H.; 1939. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung der marinen Bodentierwelt im östlichen Teil des Finnischen Meerbusens. Ann. Zool. Soc. Zool. Botan. Fennicae Vanamo, Bd. 6.Google Scholar
Tesch, J. J., 1915. De Amphipoden der Zuidelijke Nordzee verzameld met de ‘Wodan’. Rapp. Rijksinst. Vissch. underzoek, D. I, pp. 336–9.Google Scholar
Tesch, J. J., 1922. Amphipoden. In Flora en Fauna der Zuiderzee. Den Helder.Google Scholar
Valovirta, E. J., 1935. Über die Verbreitung einiger Bodentiere im Bottnischen Meerbusen. Ann. Zool. Soc. Zool.-Bot. Fennicae Vanamo, Bd. I, pp. 12–14.Google Scholar
Zaddach, G., 1844. Synopseos Crustaceorum prussicorum prodromus. Regiomonti.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaddach, G., 1878. Die Meeres-Fauna an der preussischen Küste. Schr. Phys.-ökon. Ges. z. Königsberg i. Pr., Jhrg. 19, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar