Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:26:34.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mother–young cohabitation in Phronimella elongata and Phronima spp. (Amphipoda, Hyperiidea, Phronimidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2013

Masakazu N. Aoki ,
Chie Matsumoto-Ohshima ,
Euichi Hirose  and
Jun Nishikawa
Masakazu N. Aoki
Affiliation:
Shimoda Marine Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Shimoda, Shizuoka 415-0025, Japan
Chie Matsumoto-Ohshima
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Biology, and Marine Science, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
Euichi Hirose*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Biology, and Marine Science, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
Jun Nishikawa
Affiliation:
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha 5-1-5, Kashiwa 277-8564, Japan
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: E. Hirose, Department of Chemistry, Biology, and Marine Science, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reproductive characteristics of poorly studied hyperiid amphipods, especially Phronimella elongata, are described. Among nine species of hand-collected phronimids, females of Phronimella elongata, Phronima dunbari and Phronima sedentaria cohabited with their young in a ‘barrel' derived from gelatinous zooplankton. Five growth stages of young were identified in Phronimella elongata: young of stages I–IV were found with the mother in the barrel, but stage-V young clinged to the mother retaining no barrel. The cohabiting young in Phronimella elongata and Phronima sedentaria always consisted of single growth stage. In a single female of Phronima dunbari, however, two different stages of young coexisted in a barrel. In Phronimella elongata, the mother size significantly correlated with the number of brooded eggs or cohabiting young regardless of growth stages of young. Considerable variation in the number of eggs or young per female among phronimid species may attribute to the differences in the volumes of the brood pouches.

Keywords

phronimid amphipodshand-collectionbarrelmother–young cohabitationmaternal care
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 6 , September 2013 , pp. 1553 - 1556
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoki, M. (1999) Morphological characteristics of young, maternal care behaviour and microhabitat use by caprellid amphipods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, J.T.A., Balley, R.J.E. and Elwood, R.W. (2002) Maternal care in the rockpool amphipod Apherusa jurinei: developmental and environmental cues. Animal Behaviour 63, 707–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebel, C.E. (1988) Observations on the anatomy and behavior of Phronima sedentaria (Forskål) (Amphipoda: Hyperiidea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 8, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, E., Aoki, M.N. and Nishikawa, J. (2005) Still alive? Fine structure of the barrels made by Phronima (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 1435–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Wada, S. and Mukai, H. (2002) Extended maternal care observed in Parallorchestes ochotensis (Amphipoda, Gammaridea, Talitroidea, Hyalidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 22, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, P. (1968) Observations sur la biologie de Phronima curvipes Voss. (Amphipode Hypéride) et description du mâle adulte. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 9, 127–310.Google Scholar
Laval, P. (1978) The barrel of the pelagic amphipod Phronima sedentaria (Forsk.) (Crustacea: Hyperiidea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 33, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, P. (1980) Hyperiid amphipods as crustacean parasitoids associated with gelatinous zooplankton. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 18, 11–56.Google Scholar
Murata, Y. and Wada, K. (2002) Population and reproductive biology of an intertidal sandstone-boring isopod, Sphaeroma wadai Nunomura, 1994. Journal of Natural History 36, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishikawa, J., Suzuki, Y. and Nishida, S. (2005) Immunochemical recognition of gelatinous zooplankton: an application to identify the origin of ‘barrel’ made by the pelagic amphipod, Phronima sedentaria. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, G. (1978) Beobachtungen zu Entwicklung und Verhalten von Phronima sedentaria (Forskål), (Amphipoda). Senckenbergiana Maritima 10, 229–242.Google Scholar
Shih, C.-T. (1969) The systematics and biology of the family Phronimidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Dana Report 74, 1–100.Google Scholar
Shih, C.-T. (1991) Description of two new species of Phronima Latreille, 1802 (Amphipoda: Hyperiidea) with a key to all species of the genus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 11, 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, M. (1997) Another caprellid amphipod with extended parental care: Aeginina longicornis. Journal of Crustacean Biology 17, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, M. (1999) Duration of extended parental care in marine amphipods. Journal of Crustacean Biology 19, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, M. (2003a) Extended parental care in crustaceans—an update. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, M. (2003b) Reproductive biology of Limnoria chilensis: another boring peracarid species with extended parental care. Journal of Natural History 37, 1713–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Aoki et al. supplementary material

Supplementary table

Download Aoki et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.4 KB