Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:17:57.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphometric relationships and relative growth of 20 uncommon bivalve species from the Algarve coast (southern Portugal)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2016

Paulo Vasconcelos ,
Paula Moura ,
Fábio Pereira ,
Alexandre M. Pereira  and
Miguel B. Gaspar
Paulo Vasconcelos*
Affiliation:
Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM), Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Paula Moura
Affiliation:
Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
Fábio Pereira
Affiliation:
Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
Alexandre M. Pereira
Affiliation:
Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
Miguel B. Gaspar
Affiliation:
Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal Centro de Ciências do Mar (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P. Vasconcelos, Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study reports the morphometric relationships and relative growth of 20 uncommon bivalve species collected along the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Morphometric relationships were established between three linear variables (shell length, height and width) and one ponderal variable (total weight) and the relative growth between variables (isometry vs allometry) was analysed in order to assess their variation throughout ontogeny. In addition, morphometric indices (elongation, compactness, convexity and density) based on ratios of those linear and ponderal variables were calculated in order to further characterize morphologically the bivalve species. A total of 2512 individuals belonging to nine bivalve families were analysed, comprising specimens with broad ranges in both shell length (11.8–109.0 mm SL) and total weight (0.2–354.6 g TW). All morphometric relationships were highly significant (P < 0.001) and displayed invariably high correlation coefficients (r = 0.727–0.998). Among a total of 60 morphometric relationships, 27 isometries, 25 positive allometries and 8 negative allometries were registered. The morphometric indices displayed a remarkable variation among taxa, reflecting the high morphological diversity of these miscellaneous bivalve species. Discriminant analysis provided a spatial visualization of the species morphometric variables that further evidenced their main shape features, the distinctness between some species and families (e.g. Pharidae and Cardiidae) and the morphological resemblance among some species belonging to other families (e.g. Veneridae and Tellinidae). Overall, this information is useful and has practical application in diverse research fields, including studies on systematics and taxonomy, physiology, biology, ecology, fisheries assessment and management.

Keywords

Isometryallometrymorphometric indicesphenotypic plasticitymorphological diversityshell shapelife-habitsBivalvia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 463 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afonso, C. (2007) Bivalvia. In Borges, T.C. (ed.) Biodiversity in the fisheries of Algarve (south Portugal). Faro: Universidade do Algarve, pp. 242–303.Google Scholar
Alyakrinskaya, I.O. (2005) Functional significance and weight properties of the shell in some mollusks. Biology Bulletin 32, 397–418.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. and Gutreuter, S. (1983) Length, weight, and associated structural indices. In Nielsen, L. and Johnson, D. (eds) Fisheries techniques. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 283–300.Google Scholar
Beyer, J.E. (1991) On length-weight relationships. Part 2: computing mean weights from length statistics. Fishbyte 9, 50–54.Google Scholar
Caill-Milly, N., Bru, N., Barranger, M., Gallon, L. and D'Amico, F. (2014) Morphological trends of four Manila clam populations (Venerupis philippinarum) on the French Atlantic coast: identified spatial patterns and their relationship to environmental variability. Journal of Shellfish Research 33, 355–372.Google Scholar
Caill-Milly, N., Bru, N., Mahé, K., Borie, C. and D'Amico, F. (2012) Shell shape analysis and spatial allometry patterns of Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in a mesotidal coastal lagoon. Journal of Marine Biology 2012, Article ID 281206.Google Scholar
Crosby, M.P. and Gale, L.D. (1990) A review and evaluation of bivalve condition index methodologies with a suggested standard method. Journal of Shellfish Research 9, 233–237.Google Scholar
Davenport, J. and Chen, X. (1987) A comparison of methods for the assessment of condition in the mussel (Mytilus edulis L.). Journal of Molluscan Studies 53, 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagar, R.M.C. (1978) Shape and function of the shell: a comparison of some living and fossil bivalve mussels. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 53, 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Castro, M. and Monteiro, C.C. (1999) Effect of tooth spacing and mesh size on the catch of the Portuguese clam and razor clam dredge. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Dias, M.D., Campos, A., Monteiro, C.C., Santos, M.N., Chícharo, A. and Chícharo, L. (2001b) The influence of dredge design on the catch of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758). Hydrobiologia 465, 153–167.Google Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Leitão, F., Santos, M.N., Chícharo, L., Dias, M.D., Chícharo, A. and Monteiro, C.C. (2003b) A comparison of direct macrofaunal mortality using three types of clam dredges. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60, 733–742.Google Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Leitão, F., Santos, M.N., Sobral, M., Chícharo, L., Chícharo, A. and Monteiro, C.C. (2002b) Influence of mesh size and tooth spacing on the proportion of damaged organisms in the catches of the Portuguese clam dredge fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, 1228–1236.Google Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Leitão, F., Santos, M.N., Sobral, M., Chícharo, L., Chícharo, A. and Monteiro, C.C. (2003a) Size selectivity of the Spisula solida dredge in relation to tooth spacing and mesh size. Fisheries Research 60, 561–568.Google Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Santos, M.N. and Vasconcelos, P. (2001a) Weight-length relationships of 25 bivalve species (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 805–807.Google Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Santos, M.N., Vasconcelos, P. and Monteiro, C.C. (2002a) Shell morphometric relationships of the most common bivalve species (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Hydrobiologia 477, 73–80.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, J.M.S., Bentes, L., Lino, P.G., Ribeiro, J., Canário, A.V.M. and Erzini, K. (1997) Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and south-west coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research 30, 253–256.Google Scholar
Gosling, E. (2003) Bivalve molluscs: biology, ecology and culture. Oxford: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Huxley, J.S. and Teissier, G. (1936) Terminology of relative growth. Nature 137, 780–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A. and Beninger, P.G. (1985) The use of physiological condition indices in marine bivalve aquaculture. Aquaculture 44, 187–200.Google Scholar
Macedo, M.C.C., Macedo, M.I.C. and Borges, J.P. (1999) Conchas marinhas de Portugal (seashells of Portugal). Lisboa: Editorial Verbo.Google Scholar
Mayrat, A. (1970) Allométrie et taxinomie. Révue de Statistique Appliquée 18, 47–58.Google Scholar
McKeon, C.S., Tunberg, B.C., Johnston, C.A. and Barshis, D.J. (2015) Ecological drivers and habitat associations of estuarine bivalves. PeerJ 3, e1348.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A., Jaramillo, E., Defeo, O., Dugan, J., de Ruyck, A. and Coetzee, P. (1995) Adaptations of bivalves to different beach types. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 187, 147–160.Google Scholar
Morato, T., Afonso, P., Lourinho, P., Barreiros, J.P., Santos, R.S. and Nash, R.D.M. (2001) Length-weight relationships for 21 coastal fish species of the Azores, north-eastern Atlantic. Fisheries Research 50, 297–302.Google Scholar
Murren, C.J., Auld, J.R., Callahan, H., Ghalambor, C.K., Handelsman, C.A., Heskel, M.A., Kingsolver, J.G., MacLean, H.J., Masel, J., Maughan, H., Pfennig, D.W., Relyea, R.A., Seiter, S., Snell-Rood, E., Steiner, U.K. and Schlichting, C.D. (2015) Constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity: limits and costs of phenotype and plasticity. Heredity 115, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutlu, E. (2013) Morphometry and areal growth cohorts of common epifaunal species on a sand bottom of the Cilician shelf (Turkey), Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences 7, 42–53.Google Scholar
Oliveira, M.T., Santos, M.N., Coelho, R., Monteiro, V., Martins, A. and Lino, P.G. (2015) Weight–length and length–length relationships for reef fish species from the Cape Verde Archipelago (tropical north-eastern Atlantic). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 31, 236–241.Google Scholar
Park, K.Y. and Oh, C.W. (2002) Length-weight relationship of bivalves from coastal waters of Korea. Naga: The ICLARM Quarterly 25, 21–22.Google Scholar
Pauly, D. (1993) Fishbyte Section Editorial. Naga: The ICLARM Quarterly 16, 26.Google Scholar
Petrakis, G. and Stergiou, K.I. (1995) Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters. Fisheries Research 21, 465–469.Google Scholar
Pohlo, R.H. (1964) Ontogenic changes of form and mode of life in Tresus nuttallii (Bivalvia: Mactridae). Malacologia 1, 321–330.Google Scholar
Poppe, G.T. and Goto, Y. (1993) European seashells. Volume II (Scaphopoda, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda). Wiesbaden: Verlag Christa Hemmen.Google Scholar
Powell, E.N., Mann, R., Ashton-Alcox, K.A., Kim, Y. and Bushek, D. (2016). The allometry of oysters: spatial and temporal variation in the length–biomass relationships for Crassostrea virginica. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 96, 1127–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, M.J. (1989) The allometry of growth and reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, D.C. and Pannella, G. (1970) The use of molluscan growth patterns in ecology and paleoecology. Lethaia 3, 143–161.Google Scholar
Richter, H.C., Luckstadt, C., Focken, U. and Becker, K. (2000) An improved procedure to assess fish condition on the basis of length-weight relationships. Archive of Fishery and Marine Research 48, 255–264.Google Scholar
Ricker, W.E. (1973) Linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30, 409–434.Google Scholar
Robinson, L.A., Greenstreet, S.P.R., Reiss, H., Callaway, R., Craeymeersch, J., De Boois, I., Degraer, S., Ehrich, S., Fraser, H.M., Goffin, A., Kröncke, I., Lindal Jorgenson, L., Robertson, M.R. and Lancaster, J. (2010) Length–weight relationships of 216 North Sea benthic invertebrates and fish. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 95–104.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Marin, E., Ortiz, M., Ortiz de Urbina, J.M., Quelle, P., Walter, J., Abid, N., Addis, P., Alot, E., Andrushchenko, I., Deguara, S., Di Natale, A., Gatt, M., Golet, W., Karakulak, S., Kimoto, A., Macias, D., Saber, S., Santos, M.N. and Zarrad, R. (2015) Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) biometrics and condition. PLoS ONE 10, e0141478.Google Scholar
Santos, M.N., Canas, A., Lino, P.G. and Monteiro, C.C. (2006) Length–girth relationships for 30 marine fish species. Fisheries Research 78, 368–373.Google Scholar
Santos, M.N., Gaspar, M.B., Vasconcelos, P. and Monteiro, C.C. (2002) Weight-length relationships for 50 selected fish species of the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Fisheries Research 59, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, S.M. (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24, 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seed, R. (1980) Shell growth and form in Bivalvia. In Rhoads, D.C. and Lutz, R.A. (eds) Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms. biological records of environmental change. New York, NY: Plenum Press, pp. 23–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selin, N.I. (2007) Shell form, growth and life span of Astarte arctica and A. borealis (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the subtidal zone of northeastern Sakhalin. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 33, 232–237.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1987) Introduction to biostatistics. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
Stanley, S.M. (1970) Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America Memoirs 125, 1–282.Google Scholar
Stanley, S.M. (1975) Why clams have the shape they have: an experimental analysis of burrowing. Paleobiology 1, 48–58.Google Scholar
Stanley, S.M. (1981) Infaunal survival: alternative functions of shell ornamentation in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Paleobiology 7, 384–393.Google Scholar
Stergiou, K.I. and Karpouzi, V.S. (2003) Length–girth relationships for several marine fishes. Fisheries Research 60, 161–168.Google Scholar
Tebble, N. (1966) British bivalve seashells. A handbook for identification. Edinburgh: British Museum.Google Scholar
Thayer, C.W. (1975) Morphological adaptations of benthic invertebrates to soft substrata. Journal of Marine Research 33, 177–189.Google Scholar
Trueman, E.R., Brand, A.R. and Davis, P. (1966) The effect of substrate and shell shape on the burrowing of some common bivalves. Journal of Molluscan Studies 37, 97–109.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, P., Barroso, C.M. and Gaspar, M.B. (in press). Morphometric relationships and relative growth of Hexaplex trunculus and Bolinus brandaris (Gastropoda: Muricidae) from the Ria Formosa lagoon (southern Portugal). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 96, 1417–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasconcelos, P., Lopes, B., Castro, M. and Gaspar, M.B. (2008) Comparison of indices for the assessment of reproductive activity in Hexaplex trunculus (Gastropoda: Muricidae). Marine Biology Research 4, 392–399.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M.J. (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar