Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:42:34.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology of the Eye of the Hydrothermal Vent Shrimp, Alvinocaris Markensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Darrison N. Wharton ,
Robert N. Jinks ,
Erik D. Herzog ,
Barbara-Anne Battelle ,
Leonard Kass ,
George H. Renninger  and
Steven C. Chamberlain
Darrison N. Wharton
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Neuroscience, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244–1240, USA.
Robert N. Jinks
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Neuroscience, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244–1240, USA. Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244–5290, USA.
Erik D. Herzog
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Neuroscience, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244–1240, USA. Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244–5290, USA.
Barbara-Anne Battelle
Affiliation:
The Whitney Laboratory, University of Florida, St Augustine, Florida 32086, USA.
Leonard Kass
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA.
George H. Renninger
Affiliation:
Biophysics Group, Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada NIG 2W1
Steven C. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Neuroscience, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244–1240, USA. Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244–5290, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The bresiliid shrimp Alvinocaris markensis is a predator that inhabits the base of sulphide mounds built by the black smoker chimneys of active hydrothermal vents at the Snake Pit site on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Casual examination of animals collected with theDSV ‘Alvin’ suggests that, like other biesiliid shrimp from hydrothermal vents, the eyes of this species are adapted for vision in very dim light. However, examination of the structure and ultrastructure of eyes of animals collected and immediately fixed shows that the expected massive array of photoreceptors is partially or completely missing. The eye is enlarged, its dioptric apparatus has disappeared, its screening pigment is essentially gone, and its reflecting pigment cells have formed an enlarged mass of white diffusing cells behind the expected layer of photoreceptors. In half of the animals examined, there were no recognizable photoreceptors in the retina, and in the remaining animals there were only scattered photoreceptors with poorly organized microvillar arrays of photosensitive membrane. We conclude that this species is blind despite some retinal adaptations for vision in very dim light. Apparently, the ambient light of this animal's environment is below the quit point (the minimum level that can be exploited) so that the retina has begun to degenerate by losing its photoreceptors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , November 1997 , pp. 1097 - 1108
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behrens, M. & Krebs, W., 1976. The effect of light-dark adaptation on the ultrastructure of Limulus lateral eye retinular cells. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 107, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blest, A.D. & Day, W.A., 1978. The rhabdomere organization of some nocturnal pisaurid spiders in light and darkness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 283, 1–23.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, S.C. et al., 1994a. Retinal structure in hydrothermal vent shrimp from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 20, 132.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, S.C. et al., 1994b. Vision in hydrothermal vent shrimp: unusual structures for seeing in an unusual environment. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 22, supplement 1, 56.Google Scholar
Corliss, J.B. et al., 1979. Submarine thermal springs on the Galápagos Rift. Science, New York, 203, 1073–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doughtie, D.G. & Rao, K.R., 1984. Ultrastructure of the eye of the grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. General morphology, and light and dark adaptation at noon. Cell and Tissue Research, 238, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elofsson, R. & Hallberg, E., 1977. Compound eyes of some deep-sea and fjord mysid crustaceans. Acta Zoologica, 58, 169–177.Google Scholar
Grassle, J.F., 1985. Hydrothermal vent animals: distribution and biology. Science, New York, 229, 713–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itaya, S.K., 1976. Rhabdom changes in the shrimp, Palaemonetes. Cell and Tissue Research, 166, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuenzler, R.O. et al., 1997. Retinal anatomy of new bresiliid shrimp from the Lucky Strike and Broken Spur hydrothermal vent fields on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 77, 707–726.Google Scholar
Lakin, R.C., Jinks, R.N., Battelle, B-A., Herzog, E.D., Kass, L., Renninger, G.H. & Chamberlain, S.C., 1997. Retinal anatomy of the bresiliid shrimp Chorocaris chacei. Journal of Comparative Neurology, in press.Google Scholar
Loew, E.R., 1976. Light and photoreceptor degeneration in the Norway Lobster, Nephrops norvegicus (L.). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 193, 31–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Lythgoe, J.N., 1979. The ecology of vision. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J.W. & Chritiansen, J.C., 1995. A new species of the shrimp genus Chorocaris Martin & Hessler, 1990 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Bresiliidae) from hydrothermal vent fields along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 108, 220–227.Google Scholar
Martin, J.W. & Hessler, R.R., 1990. Chorocaris vandoverae, a new genus and species of hydrothermal vent shrimp (Crustacea, Decapoda, Bresiliidae) from the western Pacific. Contributions in Science, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 417, 1–11.Google Scholar
Meyer-Rochow, V.B., 1981. The eye of Orchomene sp. cf. O. rossi, an amphipod living under the Ross Ice Shelf (Antarctica). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 212, 93–111.Google Scholar
Meyer-Rochow, V.B. & Tiang, K.M., 1979. The effects of light and temperature on the structural organization of the eye of the Antarctic amphipod Orchomene plebs (Crustacea). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 206, 353–368.Google Scholar
Nilsson, H.L., 1982. Rhabdom breakdown in the eye of Cirolana borealis (Crustacea) caused by exposure to daylight. Cell and Tissue Research, 227, 633–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, H.L. & Lindström, M., 1983. Retinal damage and sensitivity loss of a light-sensitive crustacean compound eye (Cirolana borealis). Journal of Experimental Biology, 107, 277–292.Google Scholar
Nuckley, D.J., Jinks, R.N., Battelle, B-A., Herzog, E.D., Kass, L., Renninger, G.H. & Chamberlain, S.C., 1996. Retinal anatomy of a new species of bresiliid shrimp from a hydrothermal vent field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 190, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'neill, P.J., Jinks, R.N., Herzog, E.D., Battelle, B-A., Kass, L., Renninger, G.H. & Chamberlain, S.C., 1995. The morphology of the dorsal eye of the hydrothermal vent shrimp, Rimicaris exoculata. Visual Neuroscience, 12, 861–875.Google Scholar
O'neill, P.J., Jinks, R.N., Herzog, E.D. & Chamberlain, S.C., 1994. Is photoreceptor membrane shedding ubiquitous? Negative evidence from an ultra-high sensitivity photoreceptor. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35, supplement, 1520.Google Scholar
Pelli, D.G. & Chamberlain, S.C., 1989. The visibility of 350°C black-body radiation by the shrimp Rimicaris exoculata and man. Nature, London, 337, 460–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renninger, G.H., Kass, L., Gleeson, R.A., Van Dover, C.L., Battelle, B-A., Jinks, R.N., Herzog, E.D. & Chamberlain, S.C., 1995. Sulfide as a chemical stimulus for deep-sea hydrothermal vent shrimp. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 189, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rona, P.A., 1985. Black smokers and massive sulfides at the TAG hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge 26°N. Eos, 66, 936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rona, P.A., 1992. Deep-sea geysers of the Atlantic. National Geographic, 182, 104–109.Google Scholar
Rona, P.A., Klinkhammer, G., Nelsen, T.A., Trefry, J.H. & Elderfield, H., 1986. Black smokers, massive sulphides and vent biota at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature, London, 321, 33–37.Google Scholar
Segonzac, M., De Saint, Laurent M. & Casanova, B., 1994. L'énigme du comportement trophique des crevettes Alvinocarididae des sites hydrothermaux de la dorsale médio-atlantique. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 34, 535–571.Google Scholar
Shelton, P.M.J., Gaten, E. & Chapman, C.J., 1985. Light and retinal damage in Nephrops norvegicus (L.) (Crustacea). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 226, 217–236.Google Scholar
Tunnicliffe, V., 1992. Hydrothermal-vent communities of the deep sea. American Scientist, 80, 336–349.Google Scholar
Tuurala, O. & Lehtinen, A., 1971. Über die Einwirkung von Licht und Dunkel auf die Feinstruktur der Lichtsinneszellen der Assel Oniscus asellus L. II. Microvilli und multivesikuläre Körper nach starker Belichtung. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae A, IV Biologica, 177, 1–8.Google Scholar
Van Dover, C.L., 1995. Ecology of Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vents. In Hydrothermal vents and processes (ed. L.M., Parson et al.), pp. 257–289. London: The Geological Society. [Geological Society Special Publication no. 87.]Google Scholar
Van Dover, C.L. et al., 1994. Light At Deep Sea Hydrothermal Vents. Eos, 75, 44–45.Google Scholar
Van Dover, C.L., Szuts, E.Z., Chamberlain, S.C. & Cann, J.R., 1989. A novel eye in ‘eyeless’ shrimp from hydrothermal vents of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature, London, 337, 458–460.Google Scholar
Williams, A.B., 1988. New marine decapod crustaceans from waters influenced by hydrothermal discharge, brine, and hydrocarbon seepage. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 86, 263–287.Google Scholar
Williams, A.B. & Chace, F.A. Jr, 1982. A new caridean shrimp of the family Bresiliidae from the thermal vents of the Galapagos Rift. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 2, 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A.B. & Rona, P. A., 1986. Two new caridean shrimps (Bresiliidae) from a hydrothermal field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 6, 446–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.S., 1980. Ca2*-induced structural changes in photoreceptor microvilli of Diptera. Cell and Tissue Research, 206, 225–232.Google Scholar