Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:10:35.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology of antennular sensors in Clausocalanus furcatus (Copepoda: Calanoida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Marco Uttieri ,
Euan R. Brown ,
Geoff A. Boxshall  and
Maria Grazia Mazzocchi
Marco Uttieri*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biological Oceanography, Stazione Zoologica ‘A. Dohrn’, Villa Comunale 1, 80121 Napoli, Italy
Euan R. Brown
Affiliation:
Neurobiology Laboratory, Stazione Zoologica ‘A. Dohrn’, Villa Comunale 1, 80121 Napoli, Italy
Geoff A. Boxshall
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, the Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Maria Grazia Mazzocchi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biological Oceanography, Stazione Zoologica ‘A. Dohrn’, Villa Comunale 1, 80121 Napoli, Italy
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Marco Uttieri Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of Naples ‘Parthenope’ Centro Direzionale di Napoli—Isola C480143 NapoliItaly email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The success of planktonic copepods in aquatic environments is dependent on efficient sensing of their three-dimensional surroundings. The detection of external cues is of importance for the localization of other organisms (prey, predators and mates), and is mediated by an array of mechano- and chemoreceptors located on the paired antennules (A1).

We investigated the morphology and distribution pattern of A1 sensory structures in the adult female of Clausocalanus furcatus (Copepoda: Calanoida) using different techniques (camera lucida, scanning and transmission electron microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy) each focusing on a specific aspect of the structures analysed. Integration of the information collected shows that C. furcatus possesses an array of mechanical, chemical and dual-function sensors over its A1, by which the copepod can detect different stimuli from the environment. Results are discussed in the light of the unique swimming behaviour displayed by this widespread epipelagic copepod.

Keywords

Clausocalanus furcatusantennulesmechanosensorschemosensorsultrastructure
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 535 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ache, B.W. (1982) Chemoreception and thermoreception. In H.L., Atwood and D.C., Sandeman (eds) The biology of Crustacea—Volume 3—neurobiology: structure and function. New York: Academic Press, pp. 369–398.Google Scholar
Blades, P.I. and Youngbluth, M.J. (1979) Mating behavior of Labidocera aestiva (Copepoda: Calanoida). Marine Biology 51, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. (1983) Three new genera of misophrioid copepods from the near-bottom plankton community in the North Atlantic Ocean. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology) 44, 103–124.Google Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. and Huys, R. (1998) The ontogeny and phylogeny of copepod antennules. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 353, 765–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxshall, G.A., Yen, J. and Strickler, J.R. (1997) Functional significance of the sexual dimorphism in the cephalic appendages of Euchaeta rimana Bradford. Bulletin of Marine Science 61, 387–398.Google Scholar
Bundy, M.H. and Paffenhöfer, G.-A. (1993) Innervation of copepod antennules investigated using laser scanning confocal microscopy. Marine Ecology Progress Series 102, 1–14.Google Scholar
Bush, B.M.H. and Laverack, M.S. (1982) Mechanoreception. In H.L., Atwood and D.C., Sandeman (eds) The biology of Crustacea —Volume 3—neurobiology: structure and function. New York: Academic Press, pp. 399–468.Google Scholar
Buskey, E.J. (1984) Swimming pattern as an indicator of the roles of copepod sensory systems in the recognition of food. Marine Biology 79, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carotenuto, Y. (1999) Morphological analysis of larval stages of Temora stylifera (Copepoda, Calanoida) from the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Plankton Research 21, 1613–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Factor, J.R. (1978) Morphology of the mouthparts of larval lobsters Homarus americanus (Decapoda; Nephropidae), with special emphasis on their setae. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 157, 383–408.Google Scholar
Fields, D. and Yen, J. (1996) The escape behavior of Pleuromamma xiphias in response to a quantifiable fluid mechanical disturbance. In P.H., Lenz et al. (eds) Zooplankton: sensory ecology and physiology. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach, pp. 323–339.Google Scholar
Fields, D.M. and Yen, J. (2002) Fluid mechanosensory stimulation of behaviour from a planktonic marine copepod, Euchaeta rimana Bradford. Journal of Plankton Research 24, 747–755.Google Scholar
Fields, D. and Weissburg, M.J. (2004) Rapid firing rates from mechanosensory neurons in copepod antennules. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 190, 877–882.Google Scholar
Fields, D.M., Shaeffer, D.S. and Weissburg, M.J. (2002) Mechanical and neural responses from the mechanosensory hairs on the antennule of Gaussia princeps. Marine Ecology Progress Series 227, 173–186.Google Scholar
Folt, C. and Goldman, C.R. (1981) Alleopathy between zooplankton: a mechanism for interference competition. Science 213, 1133–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, B. and Fleminger, A. (1968) A revision of the genus Clausocalanus (Copepoda Calanoida) with remarks on distributional patterns in diagnostic characters. Bulletin of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California—University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 12, 1–91.Google Scholar
Gill, C.W. (1985) The response of a restrained copepod to tactile stimulation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 21, 121–125.Google Scholar
Gill, C.W. (1986) Suspected mechano- and chemosensory structures of Temora longicornis (Copepoda: Calanoida). Marine Biology 93, 449–457.Google Scholar
Gill, C.W. and Crisp, D.J. (1985) Sensitivity of intact and antennule amputated copepods to water disturbance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 21, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, M.G. and Hume, R.I. (1986) Fluorescent carbocyanine dyes allow living neurons of identified origin to be studied in long term cultures. Journal of Cell Biology 103, 171–187.Google Scholar
Huys, R. and Boxshall, G.A. (1991) Copepod evolution. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Jackson, G.A. and Kiørboe, T. (2004) Zooplankton use of chemodetection to find and eat particles. Marine Ecology Progress Series 269, 153–162.Google Scholar
Jacques, F. (1989) The setal system of crustaceans: types of setae, groupings, and functional morphology. In B.E., Felgenhauer et al. (eds) Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Katona, S.K. (1973) Evidence for sex pheromones in planktonic copepods. Limnology and Oceanography 18, 574–583.Google Scholar
Kurbjeweit, F. and Buchholz, C. (1991) Structures and suspected functions of antennular sensilla and pores of three Arctic copepods (Calanus glacialis, Metridia longa, Paraeuchaeta norvegica). Meeresforschung 33, 168–182.Google Scholar
Landry, M.R. (1980) Detection of prey by Calanus pacificus: implications of the first antennae. Limnology and Oceanography 25, 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laverack, M.S. (1968) On the receptors of marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 6, 249–324.Google Scholar
Laverack, M.S. (1988) The diversity of chemoreceptors. In Atema, J. et al. (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 287–312.Google Scholar
Laverack, M.S. and Ardill, D.J. (1965) The innervation of the aesthetasc hairs of Panulirus argus. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 106, 45–60.Google Scholar
Lenz, P.H. and Yen, J. (1993) Distal setal mechanoreceptors of the first antennae of marine copepods. Bulletin of Marine Science 53, 170–179.Google Scholar
Lenz, P.H. and Hartline, D.K. (1999) Reaction times and force production during escape behavior of a calanoid copepod, Undinula vulgaris. Marine Biology 133, 249–258.Google Scholar
Lenz, J., Weatherby, T.M., Weber, W. and Wong, K.K. (1996) Sensory specialization along the first antenna of a calanoid copepod, Pleuromamma xiphias (Crustacea). In P.H., Lenz et al. (eds) Zooplankton: sensory ecology and physiology. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach, pp. 355–363.Google Scholar
Mazzocchi, M.G. and Paffenhöfer, G.-A. (1999) Swimming and feeding behaviour of the planktonic copepod Clausocalanus furcatus. Journal of Plankton Research 21, 1501–1518.Google Scholar
Moore, P.A., Fields, D.M. and Yen, J. (1999) Physical constraints of chemoreception in foraging copepods. Limnology and Oceanography 44, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, M.M. and Brooks, E.R. (1967) Laboratory culture, growth rate, and feeding behavior of a planktonic marine copepod. Limnology and Oceanography 12, 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paffenhöfer, G.-A. and Loyd, P.A. (2000) Ultrastructure of cephalic appendage setae of marine planktonic copepods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 203, 171–180.Google Scholar
Poulet, S.A. and Marsot, P. (1978) Chemosensory grazing by marine calanoid copepods (Arthropoda: Crustacea). Science 200, 1403–1405.Google Scholar
Poulet, S.A. and Ouellet, G. (1982) The role of amino acids in the chemosensory swarming and feeding of marine copepods. Journal of Plankton Research 4, 341–361.Google Scholar
Shelton, R.G.J. and Laverack, M.S. (1970) Receptor hair structure amd function in the lobster Homarus gammarus (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 4, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickler, J.R. (1998) Observing free-swimming copepods mating. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 353, 671–680.Google Scholar
Uttieri, M. (2006) Swimming behaviour and prey perception in the calanoid copepod Clausocalanus furcatus. PhD thesis, Open University, London.Google Scholar
Watling, L. (1989) A classification system for crustacean setae based on the homology concept. In B.E., Felgenhauer et al. (eds) Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Weatherby, T.M., Wong, K.K. and Lenz, P.H. (1994) Fine structure of the distal sensory setae on the first antennae of Pleuromamma xiphias Giesbrecht (Copepoda). Journal of Crustacean Biology 14, 670–685.Google Scholar
Yen, J., Weissburg, M.J. and Doall, M.H. (1998) The fluid physics of signal perception by mate-tracking copepods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 353, 787–804.Google Scholar
Yen, J., Lenz, P.H., Gassie, D.V. and Hartline, D.K. (1992) Mechanoreception in marine copepods: electrophysiological studies on the first antennae. Journal of Plankton Research 14, 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar