Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:59:16.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological and molecular taxonomy of Timea (Porifera: Timeidae) from the Gulf of Mexico with the description of a new species and re-description of T. hechteli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2020

José Antonio Cruz-Barraza*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Unidad Académica Mazatlán), Avenida Joel Montes Camarena s/n, Mazatlán (SIN) 82000, PO Box 811, México
Cristina Vega
Affiliation:
GEOMARE Investigación Terrestre y Marina, Julio Berdegué Aznar 457 CP 82110 Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México
Klaus Rützler
Affiliation:
Dept Invertebrate Zoology/CCRE Program National Museum of Natural History, MRC 163 Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC20013-7012, USA
Manuel Salas-Castañeda
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Unidad Académica Mazatlán), Avenida Joel Montes Camarena s/n, Mazatlán (SIN) 82000, PO Box 811, México
*
Author for correspondence: José Antonio Cruz-Barraza, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We present the description of a new species of genus Timea and the re-description of T. hechteli from cryptic habitats in the Gulf of Mexico. Timea alcoladoi sp. nov. is an encrusting, pale orange sponge, with megascleres ranging from styles to subtylostyles (185–990 μm long) and a single category of microscleres, spherostrongilaster characterized by a prominent rounded centre (5–15 μm in diameter). Timea hechteli was established by Lehnert & Heimler, based on the description of a very small specimen, previously recorded as Halicometes stellata by Little, and transferred to the genus Timea by Hechtel. However, because the name ‘stellata’ was preoccupied by the type species, T. stellata, the species was renamed T. hechteli, to honour George Hechtel. After the revision of Little's material and new material, we present the re-description of T. hechteli. For both species, partial sequences of COI mtDNA and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA region were obtained in order to complement our morphological taxonomy and establish their molecular systematic position among tethyids. Tree topologies for both loci were congruent by grouping together our species as a sister group of the main Tethyida clade, which is according to the current systematics of the group. The COI fragment showed Timea as polyphyletic due to two sequences of Timea (from GenBank) that were clustered with other sponge groups. The species described here are the first record of the genus Timea from the Mexican coast of the Gulf of Mexico. A taxonomic key for West Atlantic Timea species is also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanquer, A and Uriz, MJ (2008) ‘A posteriori’ searching for phenotypic characters to described new cryptic species of sponges revealed by molecular markers (Scopalina: Dictyonellidae). Invertebrate Systematics 22, 489502. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boury-Esnault, N (1973) Résultats Scientifiques des Campagnes de la ‘Calypso’. Campagne de la ‘Calypso’ au large des côtes atlantiques de l'Amérique du Sud (1961–1962). I. 29. Spongiaires. Annales de l'Institut océanographique 49(suppl. 10), 263295.Google Scholar
Boury-Esnault, N and Rützler, K (1997) Thesaurus of sponge morphology. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 596, 155. https//doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boury-Esnault, N, Klautau, M, Bézac, C, Wulf, J and Solé-Cava, AM (1999) Comparative study of putative conspecific sponge populations from both sides of the Isthmus of Panama. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerbank, JS (1866) A Monograph of the British Spongiadae, vol. 2. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Carballo, JL and Cruz-Barraza, JA (2006) The genus Timea (Porifera: Timeidae) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean: revision of type material, new species and intraspecific variability. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 47, 301320. https//doi.org/10.21411/CBM.A.47001D89.Google Scholar
Carballo, JL and Cruz-Barraza, JA (2008) First record of Axinyssa Lendenfeld, 1897 (Demospongiae, Halichondrida) from the East Pacific Ocean, with the description of Axinyssa Isabela sp. nov. Zootaxa 1784, 5868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carballo, JL and Cruz-Barraza, JA (2010) A revision of the genus Mycale (Poecilosclerida: Mycalidae) from the Mexican Pacific Ocean. Contributions to Zoology 79, 165191. doi: 10.1163/18759866-07904003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carballo, JL, Cruz-Barraza, JA, Yáñez, B and Gómez, P (2018) Taxonomy and molecular systematic position of freshwater genus Racekiela (Porifera: Spongillida) with the description of a new species from North-west Mexico. Systematics and Biodiversity 16, 160170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1359216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, HJ (1882) New sponges, observations on old ones, and a proposed new group. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (5) 10, 106125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castresana, J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17, 540552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz-Barraza, JA, Vega, C and Carballo, JL (2014) Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and Cox1 and cob mtDNA data. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 171, 254276. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz-Barraza, JA, Vega, C, Ávila, E and Vazquez-Maldonado, LE (2017) Integrative taxonomy reveals the first record and a new species for the previously monotypic genus Tethytimea (Tethyida: Tethyidae) in the Gulf of Mexico. Zootaxa 4226, 113125. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4226.1.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, MW (1932) The marine and fresh-water sponges of California. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 81, 1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, MW (1936) A discussion of the sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas in particular and the West Indies in general, with material for a revision of the families and orders of the Porifera. Carnegie Institute of Washington, 467(Tortugas Laboratory Paper 30), pp. 1225.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, MW (1950) The Porifera of the Bermuda Archipelago. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 27, 1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, MW (1956) Preliminary discussion of the sponges of Brasil. Contribuições Avulsas Instituto Oceanografico 1, 14.Google Scholar
Folmer, O, Black, M, Hoeh, W, Lutz, R and Vrijenhoek, R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294299.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, JE (1867) Notes on the arrangement of sponges, with the descriptions of some new genera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1867, 492558.Google Scholar
Hajdu, E and Rützler, K (1998) Sponges, genus Mycale (Poecilosclerida: Demospongiae: Porifera), from a Caribbean mangrove and comments on subgeneric classification. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 111, 737777.Google Scholar
Hechtel, GJ (1969) New species and records of shallow-water Demospongiae from Barbados, West Indies. Postilla 132, 138. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.12977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I and Nickel, M (2010) Description and molecular phylogeny of Tethya leysae sp. nov. (Porifera, Demospongiae, Hadromerida) from the Canadian Northeast Pacific with remarks on the use of microtomography in sponge taxonomy. Zootaxa 2422, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgin, T (1877) Description of some sponges obtained during a cruise of the team-yacht ‘Argo’ in the Caribbean and neighbouring seas. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4, 291299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, JNA and Van Soest, RWM (2002) Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. 1, 1st Edn.New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kober, K and Nichols, SA (2007) On the phylogenetic relationships of hadromerid and poecilosclerid sponges. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 585598. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315407058237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S, Stecher, G and Tamura, K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 7, 18701874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavrov, DV, Wang, X and Kelly, M (2008) Reconstructing ordinal relationships in the Demospongiae using mitochondrial genomic data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49, 111124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehnert, H and Heimler, W (2001) Description of the North Jamaican Timea micraster n. sp. (Porifera: Demospongiae: Hadromerida: Timeidae). Beaufortia 51, 213220.Google Scholar
Leite, DMB, Fonseca, CA, Leal, CV and Hajdu, E (2015) Two new species of Timea from the Southwest Atlantic (Timeidae, Demospongiae, Porifera). Zootaxa 4034, 161181. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4034.1.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, SC, Wiklund, H, Glover, AG, Dahlgren, TG and Tana, KS (2017) New genus and species of abyssal sponge commonly encrusting polymetallic nodules in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, East Pacific Ocean. Systematics and Biodiversity 15, 507519. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1358218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, FJ Jr (1963) The sponge fauna of the St. George's Sound, Apalache Bay, and PanamaCity regions of the Florida Gulf Coast. Tulane Studies in Zoology 11, 3171.Google Scholar
Macola, R and Menegola, C (2018) On the Tethyida (Porifera, Demospongiae) from Bahia State, northeast Brazil, with descriptions of two new species, taxonomic appointments and new records. Zootaxa 4433, 290304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MA, Pfeiffer, W and Schwartz, T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). San Diego Supercomputer Center. Available at https://doi.org/10.1109/gce.2010.5676129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misof, B, Erpenbeck, D and Sauer, KP (2000) Mitochondrial gene fragments suggest paraphyly of the genus Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17, 7684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraes, FC (2011) Esponjas das Ilhas Oceânicas Brasileiras. Museu Nacional/UFRJ. Série Livros 44, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 252 pp.Google Scholar
Morrow, C and Cárdenas, P (2015) Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera). Frontiers in Zoology 12, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-015-0099-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mothes, B, Santos, CP and Campos, MA (2004) Timea bioxyasterina sp. n., a new species from the Northeastern coast of Brazil (Demospongiae, Hadromerida). Zootaxa 443, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muricy, G and Santos, C (2007) Timea cumana Pulitzer-Finali, 1977. In Lavrado, HP and Viana, MS (eds), Atlas de invertebrados marinhos da região central da Zona Econômica Exclusiva brasileira. Parte 1. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional Série Livros 25, pp. 38.Google Scholar
Posada, D (2008) Jmodeltest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 12531256. http//doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulitzer-Finali, G (1986) A collection of West Indian Demospongiae (Porifera). In Appendix, a list of the Demospongiae hitherto recorded from the West Indies. Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale Giacomo Doria 86, 65216.Google Scholar
Redmond, NE, Morrow, CC, Thacker, RW, Diaz, MC, Boury-Esnault, N, Cárdenas, P, Hajdu, E, Lôbo-Hajdu, G, Picton, BE and Collins, AG (2013) Phylogeny and systematics of Demospongiae in light of new small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Integrative and Comparative Biology 53, 388415. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/ict078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronquist, F and Huelsenbeck, JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19, 15721574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rützler, K (2002) Family Timeidae Topsent, 1928. In Hooper, JNA and Van Soest, RWM (eds), Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. 1. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 266267. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0747-5_27.Google Scholar
Rützler, K, Piantoni, C, Van Soest, RWM and Díaz, MC (2014) Diversity of sponges (Porifera) from cryptic habitats on the Belize barrier reef near Carrie Bow Cay. Zootaxa 3805, 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarà, M, Sarà, A, Nickel, M and Brümmer, F (2001) Three new species of Tethya (Porifera: Demospongiae) from German aquaria. Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Naturkunde (A. Biologie) 631, 115.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O (1870) Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, iii–iv, pp. 188.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 13121313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thacker, RW, Hill, AL, Hill, MS, Redmond, NE, Collins, AG, Morrow, CC, Spicer, L, Carmack, CA, Zappe, ME, Pohlmann, D, Hall, C, Diaz, MC and Bangalore, PV (2013) Nearly complete 28S rRNA gene sequences confirm new hypotheses of sponge evolution. Integrative and Comparative Biology 53, 373387. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/ict071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topsent, E (1889) Quelques spongiaires du Banc de Campêche et de la Pointe-à-Pître. Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France 2, 3052.Google Scholar
Topsent, E (1892) Diagnoses d’éponges nouvelles de la Méditerranée et plus particulièrement de Banyuls. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale (2)10 (Notes et Revue 6), xvii–xxviii.Google Scholar
Topsent, E (1928) Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Méditerranée provenant des croisières du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 74, 1376.Google Scholar
Van Soest, RWM (2009) New sciophilous sponges from the Caribbean (Porifera: Demospongiae). Zootaxa 2107, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, RWM (2017) Sponges of the Guyana Shelf. Zootaxa 4217, 1225. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4217.1.1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, RWM, Carballo, JL and Hooper, JNA (2012) Polyaxone monaxonids: revision of raspailiid sponges with polyactine megascleres (Cyamon and Trikentrion). ZooKeys 239, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, RWM, Boury-Esnault, N, Hooper, JNA, Rützler, K, de Voogd, NJ, Alvarez, B, Hajdu, E, Pisera, AB, Manconi, R, Schönberg, C, Klautau, M, Kelly, M, Vacelet, J, Dohrmann, M, Díaz, MC, Cárdenas, P, Carballo, JL, Ríos, P, Downey, R and Morrow, CC (2019) World Porifera database. Available at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=132079 (Accessed 14 May 2019).Google Scholar
White, TJ, Bruns, T, Lee, S and Taylor, JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In Innis, MA, Gelfand, DH, Sninsky, JJ and White, TJ (eds), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 315322.Google Scholar
Wiedenmayer, F (1977) Shallow-water sponges of the western Bahamas. Experientia Supplementum 28, 1287.Google Scholar