Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:20:02.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mode of life and behaviour of Montacuta phascolionis, a bivalve commensal with the sipunculan Phascolion strombi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. D. Gage
J. D. Gage
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The tiny bivalve mollusc Montacuta (Tellimya) phascolionis (Dautzenberg & Fischer) belongs to the family Montacutidae, which is usually classified in a grouping of a superfamily rank, the Galeommatacea (= Erycinacea, Leptonacea or Leptonoidea) and includes many small and rather obscure species that are found associated with a wide variety of usually burrowing marine invertebrates (see Boss, 1965). M. phascolionis recently has been referred to the genus Tellimya (Chavan, 1960, 1969; Bowden & Heppell, 1968) or removed from the Montacutidae altogether and put into a new monospecific genus, Phascoliophila (Nordsieck, 1969). It is clear that a comprehensive revision of the Montacutidae is badly needed in order to establish the correct position of the present species within the family. However, the present author feels it justified in the interim to follow Ponder (1968) in recognizing Tellimya as a subgenus of Montacuta that includes the species phascolionis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , August 1979 , pp. 635 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boss, K. J., 1965. Symbiotic erycinacean bivalves. Malacologia, 3, 183–195.Google Scholar
Bourne, G. C., 1906. Report on Jousseaumia, a new genus of eulamellibranchs commensal with the corals Heterocyathus and Heteropsammia. In Report to the Government of Ceylon on the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar, Supplementary Reports, no. 37, part V (ed. Herdman, W. A.), pp. 243–266. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
Bourne, G. C., 1907. Note to correct the name Jousseaumia. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 7, 260.Google Scholar
Bouvier, E. L., 1894. Un nouveau cas de commensalisme: association de vers du genre Aspidosiphon avec des polypes madreporaires et un mollusque bivalve. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Academie des sciences, 119, 96–98.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. & Heppell, D., 1968. Revised list of British Mollusca. 2. Unionidae-Cardiacea. Journal of Conchology, 26, 237–272.Google Scholar
Cassie, R. M., 1954. Some uses of probability paper in the analysis of size frequency distributions. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 5, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavan, A., 1960. Remarques sur la charnière des Erycinacea et des Cyamiacea. Compte rendu sommaire et bulletin de la Societé géologique de France (ser. 7), 1, 712–718.Google Scholar
Chavan, A., 1969. Superfamily Leptonacea Gray, 1847. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part N, vol. 2 (ed. Moore, R. C.), pp. 518–537. Kansas: Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Deroux, G., 1960. Formation régulière de mâles mûrs, de taille et d'organisation lanvaire chez un Eulamellibranche commensal (Montacuta phascolionis Dautz.). Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Académie des sciences, 250, 2264–2266.Google Scholar
Deroux, G., 1961. Rapports taxonomiques d'un leptonacé non decrit ‘Lepton subtrigonum’ Jeffreys (nomen nudum - 1873). Cahiers de biologie marine, 2, 99–193.Google Scholar
Ewer, D. W. & Bursall, E., 1950. A note on the classification of elementary behaviour patterns. Behaviour, 3, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. & Gunn, D. L., 1940. The Orientation of Animals. 352 pp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. & Gunn, D. L., 1961. The Orientation of Animals, 2nd edition. 376 pp. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Gage, J., 1966a. Experiments with the behaviour of the bivalves Montacuta substriata and M. ferruginosa, ‘commensals’ with spatangoids. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, J., 1966b. The life-histories of the bivalves Montacuta substriata and M. ferruginosa, ‘commensals‘ with spatangoids. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46,499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, J., 1968a. The mode of life of Mysella cuneata, a bivalve ‘commensal’ with Phascolion strombi (Sipunculoidea). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 46, 919–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, J., 1968b. The mode of life of Montacuta elevata a bivalve ‘commensal’ with Clymenella torquata (Polychaeta). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 46, 877–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerould, J. M., 1913. The sipunculids of the eastern coast of North America. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 44, 373–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, P. E., 1978. Menestho diaphana (Gastropoda) and Montacuta phascolionis (Lamellibranchia) in association with the sipunculan Phascolion strombi in British waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 683–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goreau, T. F. & Yonge, C. M., 1968. Coral community on muddy sand. Nature, London, 217, 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, G. R., 1964. Redescription of a commensal pelecypod, Rochefortia cuneata, with notes on ecology. Nautilus, 77, 125–129.Google Scholar
Harding, J. P., 1949. The use of probability paper for the graphical analysis of polymodal frequency distributions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, C. B., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates. 9. Lamellibranchia. Meddelelser fra Kommissionen for Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersegelser (ser. plankton), 4, 277–311.Google Scholar
Knudsen, J., 1944. A gephyrean, a polychaete and a bivalve (Jousseaumiella concharum, nov.sp.) living together (commensalistically) in the Indo-Malayan seas. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk naturhistorik Forening i Kjøbenhavn, 108, 15–24.Google Scholar
Kristensen, J. H., 1969. Irrigation in the sipunculid Phascolion strombi (Mont.). Ophelia, 7, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, J. H., 1970. Fauna associated with the sipunculid Phascolion strombi (Montagu), especially the parasitic gastropod Menestho diphana (Jeffreys). Ophelia, 7, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1938. Notes on the breeding of some lamellibranchs from Plymouth and their larvae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 23, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, F. J., 1949. Marine Bivalvia. Zoology of Iceland, 4 (63), 116 pp.Google Scholar
Morton, J. E., 1960. The responses and orientation of the bivalve Lasaea rubra (Montagu). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 39, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. E., 1962. Habit and orientation in the small commensal bivalve mollusc, Montacuta ferruginosa. Animal Behaviour, 10, 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, C., 1964. Studies on Danish Entopracta. Ophelia, 1, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordsieck, F., 1969. Die Europaischen Meeresmuscheln (Bivalvia) vom Eismeer bis Kapverden, Mittelmeer und Schwarzes Meeres. 256 pp. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Ockelmann, K., 1958. Marine lamellibranchiata. Meddelelser om Grønland, 122 (4), 256 pp.Google Scholar
Ockelmann, K., 1965. Developmental types in marine bivalves and their distribution along the Atlantic coast of Europe. In Proceedings of the First Malacological Congress, London, 1962 (ed. Cox, L. R. and Peake, J. F.), pp. 25–35. London: Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and the Malacological Society of London.Google Scholar
OcKelmann, K. & Muus, K., 1978. The biology, ecology and behaviour of the bivalve Mysella bidentata (Montagu). Ophelia, 17, 1–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, E., 1964. The reproduction and development of some members of the Erycinidae and Montacutidae (Mollusca, Eulamellibranchiata). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 36, 79–120.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1925. Un lamellibranche commensal de lamellibranche et quelques autres lamelli-branches commensaux. Travaux de la Station zoologique de Wimereux, 9, 164–182.Google Scholar
Pérès, J. M., 1937. Sur trois especes du genre Montacuta (Kellyidae). Travaux de la Station biologique de Roscoff, 15, 5–28.Google Scholar
Pérèz, C., 1924. Le complexe éthologique de la turritelle et du Phascolion strombi. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 49, 341–343.Google Scholar
Pérez, C., 1925. Sur le complexe éthologique du Phascolion strombi (deuxième note). Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 50, 74–76.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F., 1968. Three commensal bivalves from New Zealand. Record of the Dominion Museum, 6, 125–131.Google Scholar
Popham, M. L., 1940. The mantle cavity of some of the Erycinidae, Montacutidae and Galeomatidae with special reference to the ciliary mechanism. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 24, 549–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H., 1959. Würmer und Korallen als Synöken. Zur Kenntnis der Systeme Aspidosiphon/Heteropsammia und Hicetes/Pleurodictyum. 70 Seiten, 13 Abbildungen und 14 Tafeln, 1958.Google Scholar
Sigurdsson, J. B., Titman, C. W. & Davies, P. A., 1976. The dispersal of young post-larval bivalve molluscs by byssus threads. Nature, London, 262, 386–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachvatkina, K., 1959. Larvae of bivalve molluscs of the Black Sea in the Sevastopol region. Trudӯ Sevastopol' skoi biologicheskoi stantsii. Akademiyanauk SSSR 77, 108–152. [InRussian.]Google Scholar