Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:25:18.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The meiofauna:macrofauna ratio across the continental slope of the Goban Spur (north-east Atlantic)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2001

Els Flach
Affiliation:
Centre for Estuarine and Coastal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-CEMO), PO Box 140, 4400 AC Yerseke, The Netherlands
Jan Vanaverbeke
Affiliation:
University of Gent, Department of Biology, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
Carlo Heip
Affiliation:
Centre for Estuarine and Coastal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-CEMO), PO Box 140, 4400 AC Yerseke, The Netherlands

Abstract

Meio- and macrofauna density and biomass were estimated at the OMEX-transect across the continental slope of the Goban Spur at water depths ranging from 208 to 4460 m in the north-east Atlantic. A linear increase in the ratio between meio- and macrofauna densities with increasing water depth was found. At the continental shelf meiofauna densities were ∼50 times higher than macrofauna densities, whereas in the abyss meiofauna densities were more than 1000 times higher. This change in ratio was due to a significant decrease in macrofauna densities with increasing water depth, whereas the meiofauna densities stayed more or less at the same level. The ratio in biomass between meio- and macrofauna showed a dip at ∼1000 m. At this depth macrofauna biomass was ∼55 times higher than meiofauna biomass, whereas at ∼4500 m macrofauna biomass was only about three times higher. Macrofauna biomass was high at ∼1000 m, due to the high mean individual weight of the macrofauna, whereas meiofauna biomass and mean individual weight were low at this depth.

Meiofauna consisted of ∼90% nematodes. Within the macrofaunal fraction (>0.5 mm) a linear increase in the ratio between nematodes and macrofauna sensu stricto with depth was found. At the deepest station ∼20% of the macrofaunal fraction were nematodes, at the shallowest station only ∼2%. Thus, large nematodes became relatively more important with increasing water depth. Within the macrofauna a decrease in the abundance of filter- and surface deposit-feeders relative to the subsurface deposit-feeders with increasing water depth was observed, which may be related to a change in food input. As no decrease in mean individual weight with increasing water depth within either group could be observed, the change in meio:macrofauna ratios along the OMEX-transect merely reflects a change in taxonomic (functional) composition, rather than a change in size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)