Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:04:52.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marine algal zonation and substratum in Beer Bay, south-east Devon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. T. Boalch
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University College, London

Extract

The intertidal zonation of the dominant algal species in Beer Bay, south-east Devon, was examined in relation to substratum by means of plane-table maps and transects. The dominance of Ulva lactuca on colonies of the reef-building worms Sabellaria alveolata was noted, but the distributions of Fucus vesiculosus, F. serratus, Gigartina stellata and Enteromorpha spp. showed no correlation with substratum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anand, P. L., 1937. An ecological study of the Algae of British Chalk cliffs. J. Ecol., Vol. 25, pp. 153–88, 344–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, E. A. N., 1901. On the effect of nitrates on the carbon assimilation of marine Algae. Ann. Bot., Lond., Vol. 15, pp. 669–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, A. D., 1910. On the growth of Ulva latissima L. in water polluted by sewage. Kew Bull., 1910, pp. 1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, A. D., 1911. The ecology of Ulva. 7th Rep. Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal. Appendix 3, pp. 121–43.Google Scholar
Dewey, H., 1948. British Regional Geology South West England. D.S.I.R. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Evans, R. G., 1947. The intertidal ecology of selected localities in the Plymouth neighbourhood. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 173218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, G. L., 1914. Indications regarding the source of combined nitrogen of Ulva lactuca. Ann. Mo. hot. Gdn, Vol. 1, pp. 229–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, V. M., 1936. Marine algal ecology and the exposure factor at Peveril Point, Dorset. J. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 392423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jukes-Browne, A. J., 1904. The cretaceous rocks of Britain, Vols. 1 and 2. Mem. geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Knight, M. & Parke, M., 1950. A biological study of Fucus vesiculosus L. and F. serratus L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 439514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kylin, H., 1942. Über den Einfluss von Glucose, Ascorbinsäure und Heteroauxin auf de Keimlinge von Ulva und Enteromorpha. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., Bd. 12, pp. 114.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1943. Über die Ernährung von Ulva lactuca. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., Bd. 13, pp. 113.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1945. Weitere Angaben über die Ernäahrung von Ulva lactuca. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., Bd. 15, pp. 15.Google Scholar
Letts, E. A. & Richards, E. H., 1911. On green sea-weeds in relation to the pollution of the waters in which they occur. Jth Rep. Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal, Appendix 3, pp. 72120.Google Scholar
Meyer, C. J. A., 1874. The Cretaceous rocks of Beer Head. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., Vol. 30, pp. 369–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H. W., 1953. The Chemical Composition of Algae. Algal Culture From Laboratory To Pilot Plant. Publ. Carneg. Instn, No. 600, pp. 285302.Google Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of the British Seaweeds. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Parke, M. W., 1953. A preliminary check-list of British marine Algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 497520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, A. W. & Sherborne, C. D., 1903. The zones of the White Chalk of the English Coast. III. Devon. Proc. Geol. Ass., Lond., Vol. 18, pp. 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, H. B. & Ussher, W. A. E., 1911. Geology of The Country Near Sidmouth And Lyme Regis. Geological Memoir, No. 326, and No. 340.Google Scholar