Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:48:46.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macrofauna inhabiting the sponge Paraleucilla magna (Porifera: Calcarea) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

André Padua ,
Emilio Lanna  and
Michelle Klautau
André Padua
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, CEP 21941–902, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Emilio Lanna
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, CEP 21941–902, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, s/n, 40170-175, Campus de Ondina, Salvador, BA, Brasil
Michelle Klautau*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, CEP 21941–902, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Michelle Klautau, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, CEP 21941–902, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sponges (phylum Porifera) are important components of the benthic marine fauna known for their interactions with vertebrates and a large number of invertebrates seeking for food, shelter or substrate for attachment. Studies on this subject, however, were restricted only to the macrofauna inhabiting sponges of the class Demospongiae. In the present work, we describe the macrofauna associated with a calcareous sponge in Brazil, Paraleucilla magna. Individuals of this allegedly non-native species were monthly collected during one year in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). Fifty-one taxa representing ten animal phyla were found associated with P. magna. The most frequent and abundant taxa were Crustacea, Mollusca, Polychaeta and Bryozoa, while echinoderms, cnidarians, ascidians, nemerteans, platyhelminthes and sponges were less frequent or even rare and less abundant. Juveniles of several taxa and pregnant females of Crustacea were found associated with P. magna, but these associations were not exclusive. The macrofauna associated with P. magna did not present a clear seasonality, although it was possible to observe a change in the community composition alongside the year. The volume of the sponges was significantly related to the diversity index (H′) and number of taxa, but not with evenness (J′) and number of individuals. Our results show that P. magna is used as a substrate for attachment and/or shelter by its associates and that most of these associations are just opportunistic. The data presented here reiterate a previous proposal that sponges are important biodiversity reservoirs and that they should be seriously considered in conservation programmes.

Keywords

associationecologyCrustaceaMolluscaPolychaetaBryozoa
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , June 2013 , pp. 889 - 898
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdo, D.A. (2007) Endofauna differences between two temperate marine sponges (Demospongiae; Haplosclerida; Chalinidae) from southwest Australia. Marine Biology 152, 845–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AlertaRio, S. (2011) Sistema AlertaRio, Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro, RJ – www.rio.rj.gov.br/alertario (accessed 10 August 2011).Google Scholar
Beaulieu, S.E. (2001) Life on glass houses: sponge stalk communities in the deep sea. Marine Biology 138, 803–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becerro, M.A. (2008) Quantitative trends in sponge ecology research. Marine Ecology 29, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt-Lozano, M., Gonzalez-Farias, F., Gonzalez-Acosta, B., Garcia-Gasca, A. and Bastida-Zavala, J.R. (1998) Variation of antimicrobial activity of the sponge Aplysina fistularis (Pallas, 1766) and its relation to associated fauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 223, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezerra, L.E.A. and Coelho, P.A. (2006) Crustáceos decápodos associados a esponjas no litoral do estado do Ceará, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23, 699–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biernbaum, C.K. (1981) Seasonal changes in the amphipod fauna of Microciona prolifera (Ellis and Solander) (Porifera, Demospongia) and associated sponges in a shallow salt marsh creek. Estuaries 4, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bispo, R., Johnsson, R. and Neves, E. (2006) A new species of Asterocheres (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Asterocheridae) associated to Placospongia cristata Boury-Esnault (Porifera) in Bahia State, Brazil. Zootaxa 1351, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerrano, C., Calcinai, B., Pinca, S. and Bavestrello, G. (2006) Reef sponges as host of biodiversity: cases from North Sulawesi. In Suzuki, Y., Nakamori, T., Hidaka, M., Kayanne, H., Casareto, B.E., Nadao, K., Yamano, H. and Tsuchiya, M. (eds), 10th International Coral Reef Symposium Proceedings, Okinawa, 28 June–2 July 2006. Functional roles of sponges in coral reefs. Tokyo: Japanese Coral Reef Society, pp. 208–213.Google Scholar
Çinar, M.E., Katagan, T., Ergen, Z. and Sezgin, M. (2002) Zoobenthos inhabiting Sarcotragus muscarum (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Aegean Sea. Hydrobiologia 482, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavico, E.E.G., Muricy, G., da Gama, B.A.P., Batista, D., Ventura, C.R.R. and Pereira, R.C. (2006) Ecological roles of natural products from the marine sponge Geodia corticostylifera. Marine Biology 148, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compagnone, R.S., Oliveri, M.C., Piña, I.C., Marques, S., Rangel, H.R., Dagger, F., Suárez, A.I. and Gómez, M. (1999) 5-Alkylpyrrole-2-Carboxaldehydes from the Caribbean sponges Mycale microsigmatosa and Desmapsamma anchorata. Natural Product Letters 13, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuartas, E.I. and Excoffon, A.C. (1993) La fauna acompañante de Hymeniacidon sanguinea (Grant, 1827) (Porifera: Demospongiae). Neotrópica 39, 3–10.Google Scholar
Dereczynski, C.P., Oliveira, J.S. and Machado, C.O. (2009) Climatologia da precipitação no município do Rio de Janeiro. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia 24, 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, L.F.L. and Morgado, E.H. (1983) Crustáceos parasitos de invertebrados associados à esponja Zygomycale parishii (Bowerbank) e ao briozoário Schizoporella unicornis (Jonhston, 1847). Iheringiasérie Zoologia 62, 3–11.Google Scholar
Duarte, L.F.L. and Nalesso, R. C. (1996) The sponge Zygomycale parishii (Bowerbank) and its endobiotic fauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 42, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiore, C.L. and Jutte, P.C. (2010) Characterization of macrofaunal assemblages associated with sponges and tunicates collected off the southeastern United States. Invertebrate Biology 129, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, D.W. (1976) Animals associated with sponges at North Hayling, Hampshire. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 58, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravili, C., Belmontea, G., Cecere, E., Denitto, F., Giangrande, A., Guidetti, P., Longo, C., Mastrototaro, F., Moscatello, S., Petrocelli, A., Piraino, S., Terlizzi, A. and Boero, F. (2010). Nonindigenous species along the Apulian coast, Italy. Chemistry and Ecology 26, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J.P., McClintock, J.B., Amsler, C.D. and Huang, Y.M. (2008) Mesofauna associated with the marine sponge Amphimedon viridis. Do its physical or chemical attributes provide a prospective refuge from fish predation? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 362, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilan, M., Ben-Eliahu, M.N. and Galil, B.S. (1994) Three deep water sponges from the eastern Mediterranean and their associated fauna. Ophelia 39, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jassby, A.D. and Powell, T.M. (1990) Detecting changes in ecological time series. Ecology 71, 2044–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsson, R. (1998) Six new species of the genus Asterocheres (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) associated with sponges in Brazil. Nauplius 6, 61–99.Google Scholar
Johnsson, R. (2000) Spongiopsyllus adventicius new species and genus of Entomolepididae (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) associated with sponges in Brazil. Hydrobiologia 417, 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsson, R. (2002) Asterocherids (Copepoda; Siphonostomatoida) associated with invertebrates from California Reefs: Abrolhos (Brazil). Hydrobiologia 470, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klautau, M., Monteiro, L. and Borojevic, R. (2004) First occurrence of the genus Paraleucilla (Calcarea, Porifera) in the Atlantic Ocean: P. magna sp. nov. Zootaxa 710, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klitgaard, A.B. (1995). The fauna associated with outer shelf and upper slope sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae) at the Faroe Islands, Northeastern Atlantic. Sarsia 80, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koukouras, A., Voultsiadou-Koukouras, E., Chintiroglou, H. and Dounas, C. (1985) Benthic bionomy of the North Aegean Sea. 3. A comparison of the macrobenthic animal assemblages associated with 7 sponge species. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 26, 301–319.Google Scholar
Koukouras, A., Russo, A., Voultsiadou-Koukouras, E., Dounas, C. and Chintiroglou, C. (1992) Relationship of sponge macrofauna with the morphology of their hosts in the North Aegean Sea. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 77, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koukouras, A., Russo, A., Voultsiadou-Koukouras, E., Arvanitidis, C. and Stefanidou, D. (1996) Macrofauna associated with sponge species of different morphology. Marine Ecology—Pubblicazioni Della Stazione Zoologica Di Napoli 17, 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanna, E., Monteiro, L.C. and Klautau, M. (2007) Life cycle of Paraleucilla magna Klautau, Monteiro and Borojevic, 2004 (Porifera, Calcarea). In Custódio, M.R.Lôbo-Hajdu, G.Hajdu, E. and Muricy, G. (eds) Porifera research—biodiversity, innovation and sustainability. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional–Série Livros 28, pp. 413–418.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Gallagher, E. (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, E.R. (1968) The associates of four species of marine sponges of Oregon and Washington. Pacific Science 22, 347–351.Google Scholar
Longo, C., Mastrototaro, F. and Corriero, G. (2007) Occurrence of Paraleucilla magna (Porifera: Calcarea) in the Mediterranean sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 1749–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J.A. and Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical ecology—a primer on methods and computing. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Magnino, G., Pronzato, R., Sarà, A. and Gaino, E. (1999) Fauna associated with the horny sponge Anomoianthella lamella Pulitzer-Finali & Pronzato, 1999 (Ianthellidae, Demospongiae) from Papua-New Guinea. Italian Journal of Zoology 66, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinho, P.R., Moreira, A.P.B., Pellegrino, F.L.P.C., Muricy, G., Bastos, M.C.F., Santos, K.R.N, Giambiagi-deMarval, M. and Laport, M.S. (2009) Marine Pseudomonas putida: a potential source of antimicrobial substances against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 104, 678–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinho, P.R., Muricy, G.R.S, Silva, M.F.L., deMarval, M.G. and Laport, M.S. (2010) Antibiotic-resistant bacteria inhibited by extracts and fractions from Brazilian marine sponges. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 20, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mladenov, P.V. and Emson, R.H. (1988) Density, size structure and reproductive characteristics of fissiparous brittle stars in algae and sponges: evidence for interpopulational variation in levels of sexual and asexual reproduction. Marine Ecology Progress Series 42, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgado, E.H. and Tanaka, M.O. (2001) The macrofauna associated with the bryozoan Schizoporella errata (Walters) in southeastern Brazil. Scientia Marina 65, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalesso, R.C., Duarte, L.F.L., Pierozzi, I. and Enumo, E.F. (1995) Tube epifauna of the Polychaete Phyllochaetopterus socialis Claparède. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 41, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, B.M., Lima, E.J.B. and Pérez, C.D. (2007) Brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) associated with the octocoral Carijoa riisei (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) from the littoral of Pernambuco, Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 1263–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, G. and Omena, E. (2003) Influence of sponge morphology on the composition of the polychaete associated fauna from Rocas Atoll, northeast Brazil. Coral Reefs 22, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, A. S. (1950) Notes on the inhabitants of certain sponges at Bimini. Ecology 31, 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peattie, M. E. and Hoare, R. (1981) The sublittoral ecology of the Menai Strait. 2. The sponge Halichondria panicea (Pallas) and its associated fauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 13, 621–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, S.M., Omena, E.P. and Muricy, G. (2003) Macrofauna associated to Mycale microsigmatosa (Porifera, Demospongiae) in Rio de Janeiro State, SE Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 951–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rützler, K. (1976) Ecology of Tunisian commercial sponges. Tethys 7, 249–264.Google Scholar
Santos, O.C.S., Pontes, P.V.M.L., Santos, J.F.M., Muricy, G., Giambiagi-deMarval, M. and Laport, M.S. (2010) Isolation, characterization and phylogeny of sponge-associated bacteria with antimicrobial activities from Brazil. Research in Microbiology 161, 604–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serejo, C.S. (1998) Gammaridean and caprellidean fauna (Crustacea) associated with the sponge Dysidea fragilis Johnston at Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Bulletin of Marine Science 63, 363–385.Google Scholar
Skilleter, G.A., Russell, B.D., Degnan, B.M. and Garson, M.J. (2005) Living in a potentially toxic environment: comparisons of endofauna in two congeneric sponges from the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series 304, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. San Francisco, CA, Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Stofel, C.B., Canton, G.C., Antunes, L.A.S. and Eutrópio, F.J. (2008) Fauna associada à esponja Cliona varians (Porifera, Demospongiae). Natureza Online 6, 16–18.Google Scholar
Villamizar, E. and Laughlin, R.A. (1991) Fauna associated with the sponges Aplysina archeri and Aplysina lacunosa in a coral reef of the Archipiélago de Los Roques, National Park, Venezuela. In Reitner, J. and Keupp, H. (eds) Fossil and recent sponges. Berlin: Springer, pp. 522–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, P.H., van Dolah, R.F. and O'Rourke, C.B. (1985) A comparative study of the invertebrate macrofauna associated with seven sponge and coral species collected from the South Atlantic Bight. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 101, 187–203.Google Scholar
Westinga, E. and Hoetjes, P.C. (1981) The intrasponge fauna of Spheciospongia vesparia (Porifera, Demospongiae) at Curaçao and Bonaire. Marine Biology 62, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, J.L. (2006) Ecological interactions of marine sponges. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84, 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammit, P.P., Longo, C. and. Schembri, P.J. (2009) Occurrence of Paraleucilla magna Klautau et al., 2004 (Porifera: Calcarea) in Malta. Mediterranean Marine Science 10, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar