Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:47:40.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macrofauna inhabiting the sponge Paraleucilla magna (Porifera: Calcarea) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2012

André Padua ,
Emilio Lanna  and
Michelle Klautau
André Padua
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Emilio Lanna
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Michelle Klautau*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
*
Correspodence should be addressed to:M. KlautauUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sponges (phylum Porifera) are important components of the benthic marine fauna known for their interactions with vertebrates and a large sort of invertebrates seeking for food, shelter or substrate for attachment. Studies on this subject, however, were restricted only to the macrofauna inhabiting sponges of the class Demospongiae. In the present work, we describe the macrofauna associated with a calcareous sponge in Brazil, Paraleucilla magna. Individuals of this allegedly non-native species were monthly collected during one year in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). Fifty taxa representing 10 animal phyla were found associated with P. magna. The most frequent and abundant taxa were Crustacea, Mollusca, Polychaeta and Bryozoa, while echinoderms, cnidarians, ascidians, nemerteans, platyhelminthes and sponges were less frequent or even rare and less abundant. Juveniles of several taxa and pregnant females of Crustacea were found associated with P. magna, but these associations were not exclusive. The macrofauna associated with P. magna did not present a clear seasonality, although it was possible to observe a change in the community composition alongside the year. The volume of the sponges was significantly related to the diversity index (H′) and number of taxa, but not with evenness (J′) and number of individuals. Our results show that P. magna is used as a substrate for attachment and/or shelter by its associates and that most of these associations are just opportunistic. The data presented here reiterate a previous proposal that sponges are important biodiversity reservoirs and that they should be seriously considered in conservation programmes.

Keywords

macrofaunaspongesParaleucilla magnaRio de JaneiroBrazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 3 , May 2016 , pp. 605 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdo, D.A. (2007) Endofauna differences between two temperate marine sponges (Demospongiae; Haplosclerida; Chalinidae) from south-west Australia. Marine Biology 152, 845–854.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, S.E. (2001) Life on glass houses: sponge stalk communities in the deep sea. Marine Biology 138, 803–817.Google Scholar
Becerro, M.A. (2008) Quantitative trends in sponge ecology research. Marine Ecology 29, 167–177.Google Scholar
Betancourt-Lozano, M., Gonzalez-Farias, F., Gonzalez-Acosta, B., Garcia-Gasca, A. and Bastida-Zavala, J.R. (1998) Variation of antimicrobial activity of the sponge Aplysina fistularis (Pallas, 1766) and its relation to associated fauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 223, 1–18.Google Scholar
Biernbaum, C.K. (1981) Seasonal changes in the amphipod fauna of Microciona prolifera (Ellis and Solander) (Porifera, Demospongia) and associated sponges in a shallow salt marsh creek. Estuaries 4, 85–96.Google Scholar
Bispo, R., Johnsson, R. and Neves, E. (2006) A new species of Asterocheres (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Asterocheridae) associated to Placospongia cristata Boury-Esnault (Porifera) in Bahia State, Brazil. Zootaxa 1351, 23–34.Google Scholar
Cerrano, C., Calcinai, B., Pinca, S. and Bavestrello, G. (2006) Reef sponges as host of biodiversity: cases from North Sulawesi. In Suzuki, Y., Nakamori, T., Hidaka, M., Kayanne, H., Casareto, B.E., Nadao, K., Yamano, H. and Tsuchiya, M. (eds) 10th International Coral Reef Symposium Proceedings, Okinawa, 28 June–2 July 2006. Functional roles of sponges in coral reefs. Tokyo: Japanese Coral Reef Society, pp. 208–213.Google Scholar
Çinar, M.E., Katagan, T., Ergen, Z. and Sezgin, M. (2002) Zoobenthos inhabiting Sarcotragus muscarum (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Aegean Sea. Hydrobiologia 482, 107–117.Google Scholar
Clavico, E.E.G., Muricy, G., da Gama, B. A. P., Batista, D., Ventura, C.R.R. and Pereira, R.C. (2006) Ecological roles of natural products from the marine sponge Geodia corticostylifera. Marine Biology 148, 479–488.Google Scholar
Compagnone, R.S., Oliveri, M.C., Piña, I.C., Marques, S., Rangel, H.R., Dagger, F., Suárez, A.I. and Gómez, M. (1999) 5-Alkylpyrrole-2-Carboxaldehydes from the Caribbean sponges Mycale microsigmatosa and Desmapsamma anchorata. Natural Product Letters 13, 203–211.Google Scholar
Cuartas, E.I. and Excoffon, A.C. (1993) La fauna acompañante de Hymeniacidon sanguinea (Grant, 1827) (Porifera: Demospongiae). Neotrópica 39, 3–10.Google Scholar
Duarte, L.F.L. and Nalesso, R.C. (1996) The sponge Zygomycale parishii (Bowerbank) and its endobiotic fauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 42, 139–151.Google Scholar
Fiore, C.L. and Jutte, P.C. (2010) Characterization of macrofaunal assemblages associated with sponges and tunicates collected off the south-eastern United States. Invertebrate Biology 129, 105–120.Google Scholar
Frith, D.W. (1976) Animals associated with sponges at North Hayling, Hampshire. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 58, 353–362.Google Scholar
Gravili, C., Belmontea, G., Cecere, E., Denitto, F., Giangrande, A., Guidetti, P., Longo, C., Mastrototaro, F., Moscatello, S., Petrocelli, A., Piraino, S., Terlizzi, A. and Boero, F. (2010) Nonindigenous species along the Apulian coast, Italy. Chemistry and Ecology 26, 121–142.Google Scholar
Huang, J.P., McClintock, J.B., Amsler, C.D. and Huang, Y.M. (2008) Mesofauna associated with the marine sponge Amphimedon viridis. Do its physical or chemical attributes provide a prospective refuge from fish predation? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 362, 95–100.Google Scholar
Ilan, M., Ben-Eliahu, M.N. and Galil, B.S. (1994) Three deep water sponges from the eastern Mediterranean and their associated fauna. Ophelia 39, 45–54.Google Scholar
Jassby, A.D. and Powell, T.M. (1990) Detecting changes in ecological time series. Ecology 71, 2044–2052.Google Scholar
Klautau, M., Monteiro, L. and Borojevic, R. (2004) First occurrence of the genus Paraleucilla (Calcarea, Porifera) in the Atlantic Ocean: P. magna sp. nov. Zootaxa 710, 1–8.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, A.B. (1995). The fauna associated with outer shelf and upper slope sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae) at the Faroe Islands, North-eastern Atlantic. Sarsia 80, 1–22.Google Scholar
Koukouras, A., Voultsiadou-Koukouras, E., Chintiroglou, H. and Dounas, C. (1985) Benthic bionomy of the North Aegean Sea. 3. A comparison of the macrobenthic animal assemblages associated with 7 sponge species. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 26, 301–319.Google Scholar
Koukouras, A., Russo, A., Voultsiadou-Koukouras, E., Dounas, C. and Chintiroglou, C. (1992) Relationship of sponge macrofauna with the morphology of their hosts in the North Aegean Sea. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 77, 609–619.Google Scholar
Koukouras, A., Russo, A., Voultsiadou-Koukouras, E., Arvanitidis, C. and Stefanidou, D. (1996) Macrofauna associated with sponge species of different morphology. Marine Ecology—Pubblicazioni Della Stazione Zoologica Di Napoli 17, 569–582.Google Scholar
Lanna, E., Monteiro, L.C. and Klautau, M. (2007) Life cycle of Paraleucilla magna Klautau, Monteiro and Borojevic, 2004 (Porifera, Calcarea). In Custódio, M.R., Lôbo-Hajdu, G., Hajdu, E. and Muricy, G. (eds) Porifera research—biodiversity, innovation and sustainability. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional—Série Livros 28, pp. 413–418.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Gallagher, E. (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129, 271–280.Google Scholar
Long, E.R. (1968) The associates of four species of marine sponges of Oregon and Washington. Pacific Science 22, 347–351.Google Scholar
Longo, C., Mastrototaro, F. and Corriero, G. (2007) Occurrence of Paraleucilla magna (Porifera: Calcarea) in the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 1749–1755.Google Scholar
Ludwig, J.A. and Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Magnino, G., Pronzato, R., Sarà, A. and Gaino, E. (1999) Fauna associated with the horny sponge Anomoianthella lamella Pulitzer-Finali & Pronzato, 1999 (Ianthellidae, Demospongiae) from Papua-New Guinea. Italian Journal of Zoology 66, 175–181.Google Scholar
Mladenov, P.V. and Emson, R.H. (1988) Density, size structure and reproductive characteristics of fissiparous brittle stars in algae and sponges: evidence for interpopulational variation in levels of sexual and asexual reproduction. Marine Ecology Progress Series 42, 181–194.Google Scholar
Morgado, E.H. and Tanaka, M.O. (2001) The macrofauna associated with the bryozoan Schizoporella errata (Walters) in south-eastern Brazil. Scientia Marina 65, 173–181.Google Scholar
Nalesso, R.C., Duarte, L.F.L., Pierozzi, I. and Enumo, E.F. (1995) Tube epifauna of the polychaete Phyllochaetopterus socialis Claparède. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 41, 91–100.Google Scholar
Neves, B.M., Lima, E.J.B. and Pérez, C.D. (2007) Brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) associated with the octocoral Carijoa riisei (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) from the littoral of Pernambuco, Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 1263–1267.Google Scholar
Neves, G. and Omena, E. (2003) Influence of sponge morphology on the composition of the polychaete associated fauna from Rocas Atoll, northeast Brazil. Coral Reefs 22, 123–129.Google Scholar
Pearse, A.S. (1950) Notes on the inhabitants of certain sponges at Bimini. Ecology 31, 149–151.Google Scholar
Peattie, M.E. and Hoare, R. (1981) The sublittoral ecology of the Menai Strait. 2. The sponge Halichondria panicea (Pallas) and its associated fauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 13, 621–635.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, S.M., Omena, E.P. and Muricy, G. (2003) Macrofauna associated to Mycale microsigmatosa (Porifera, Demospongiae) in Rio de Janeiro State, SE Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 951–959.Google Scholar
Rützler, K. (1976) Ecology of Tunisian commercial sponges. Tèthys 7, 249–264.Google Scholar
Serejo, C.S. (1998) Gammaridean and caprellidean fauna (Crustacea) associated with the sponge Dysidea fragilis Johnston at Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Bulletin of Marine Science 63, 363–385.Google Scholar
Skilleter, G.A., Russell, B.D., Degnan, B.M. and Garson, M.J. (2005) Living in a potentially toxic environment: comparisons of endofauna in two congeneric sponges from the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series 304, 67–75.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Villamizar, E. and Laughlin, R.A. (1991) Fauna associated with the sponges Aplysina archeri and Aplysina lacunosa in a coral reef of the Archipiélago de Los Roques, National Park, Venezuela. In Reitner, J. and Keupp, H. (eds) Fossil and recent sponges. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 522–542.Google Scholar
Wendt, P.H., van Dolah, R.F. and O'Rourke, C.B. (1985) A comparative study of the invertebrate macrofauna associated with seven sponge and coral species collected from the South Atlantic Bight. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 101, 187–203.Google Scholar
Westinga, E. and Hoetjes, P.C. (1981) The intrasponge fauna of Spheciospongia vesparia (Porifera, Demospongiae) at Curaçao and Bonaire. Marine Biology 62, 139–150.Google Scholar
Wulff, J.L. (2006) Ecological interactions of marine sponges. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84, 146–166.Google Scholar
Zammit, P.P., Longo, C. and. Schembri, P.J. (2009) Occurrence of Paraleucilla magna Klautau et al., 2004 (Porifera: Calcarea) in Malta. Mediterranean Marine Science 10, 135–138.Google Scholar