Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:10:10.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macrobenthic community structure and distribution in the Zwin nature reserve (Belgium and The Netherlands)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2009

Carl Van Colen ,
Frederik Snoeck ,
Kris Struyf ,
Magda Vincx  and
Steven Degraer
Carl Van Colen*
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, Krijgslaan 281/S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Frederik Snoeck
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, Krijgslaan 281/S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Kris Struyf
Affiliation:
The Zwin Provincial Nature Park, Graaf Léon Lippensdreef 8, B-8300 Knokke-Heist, Belgium
Magda Vincx
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, Krijgslaan 281/S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Steven Degraer
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, Krijgslaan 281/S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Marine Ecosystem Management Section, Gulledelle 100, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: C. Van Colen, Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section Krijgslaan 281/S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distribution and structure of intertidal macrobenthic communities in the Zwin nature reserve, a lagoonal inlet consisting of marsh and tidal flat habitats, was investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Macrobenthos community structure was related to environmental characteristics and discussed in the framework of the implemented extension of the nature reserve.

Based on explorative multivariate techniques, five different sample groups (SGs) were distinguished, which were, in general, located in different habitats of the Zwin nature reserve. The ecologically most important SGs consisted of the highest macrobenthic density, diversity and highest densities of Nereis diversicolor and Scrobicularia plana; these important prey species for wading birds and fish occurred in the deep tidal inlet channels. This habitat was characterized by fine to medium sand sediment and strong tidal currents, guaranteeing water renewal at each high tide. Other SGs were found in less and erratically submersed and thus stressed areas (i.e. tidal pond, salt pans and shallow flats). These assemblages were characterized by typical r-strategists (i.e. Capitella capitata and Polydora cornuta) and typical supralittoral, mobile species (i.e. Orchestia gammarellus and Collembola spp.). Being ecologically most important, the extension of wide, tidal creeks should be a prime target within the future development and management of the nature reserve.

Keywords

macrobenthic community structure and habitat preferencesZwin nature reserveintertidal habitat
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 431 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon, (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Community L206 35, 7–50.Google Scholar
Anon, (2000) Council Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 on the establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Community L327, 1–72.Google Scholar
Bachelet, G., de Montaudouin, X., Auby, I. and Labourg, P.J. (2000) Seasonal changes in macrophyte and macrozoobenthos assemblages in three coastal lagoons under varying degrees of eutrophication. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 1495–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukema, J.J. (1976) Biomass and species richness of the macrobenthic animals living on tidal flats of the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 10, 236–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukema, J.J. (1981) Quantitative data on the benthos in the Wadden Sea proper. In Dankers, N., Kühl, H. and Wolff, Q.J. (eds) Invertebrates of the Wadden Sea. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 134–142.Google Scholar
Beukema, J.J. and Dekker, R. (2005) Decline of recruitment success in cockles and other bivalves in the Wadden Sea: possible role of climate change, predation on postlarvae and fisheries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 287, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, S., Moura, A., Gaspar, M.B., Pereira, P., da Fonseca, L.C., Falcão, M., Drago, T., Lietão, F. and Regala, J. (2005) Spatial and inter-annual variability of the macrobenthic communities within a coastal lagoon (Óbidos lagoon) and its relationship with environmental parameters. Acta Oecologia 27, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2006) Primer v6: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth, UK: Primer-E, Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition. Plymouth, UK: Primer-E, Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K.E.L. (eds) (1977) The birds of the western Palearctic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diaz, R.J. (2001) Overview of hypoxia around the world. Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dörjes, J., Michaelis, H. and Rhode, B. (1986) Long-term studies of macrozoobenthos in intertidal and shallow subtidal hatitats near the island of Norderney (East Frisian coast, Germany). Hydrobiologia 142, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P. (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345–366.Google Scholar
Eertman, R.M.H., Kornman, B.A., Stikvoort, E. and Verbeek, H. (2002) Restoration of the Sieperda tidal marsh in the Scheldt estuary, the Netherlands. Restoration Ecology 10, 438–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchauld, K. and Jumars, P.A. (1979) The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 17, 193–284.Google Scholar
Gamito, S. (2006) Benthic ecology of semi-natural coastal lagoons, in the Ria Formosa (Southern Portugal), exposed to different water renewal regimes. Hydrobiologia 555, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, H., Cattrijsse, A. and Mees, J. (2004) Changes in marsh nekton communities along the salinity gradient of the Schelde river, Belgium and the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 515, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, H., Cattrijsse, A. and Elliott, M. (2005) Feeding habits of young predatory fishes in marsh creeks situated along the salinity gradient of the Schelde estuary, Belgium and the Netherlands. Helgoland Marine Research 59, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magni, P., Micheletti, S., Casu, D., Floris, A., Giordani, G., Petrov, A.N., De Falco, G. and Castelli, A. (2005) Relationships between chemical characteristics of sediments and macrofaunal communities in the Cabras lagoon (Western Mediterranean, Italy). Hydrobiologia 550, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D.S. and Elliott, M. (2004) The estuarine ecosystem—ecology, threats and management, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, T.H. and Rosenberg, R. (1978) Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 16, 229–311.Google Scholar
Snelgrove, P.V.R. and Butman, C.A. (1994) Animal–sediment relationships revisited: cause vs. effect. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 32, 111–177.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1997) Biometry. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Struyf, K. and Degraer, S. (2003) Quick Scan van de gevolgen van het afsluiten van Het Zwin op de ecologie. Herwerkte versie (oorspr. tekst: RIKZ/AB/2003/805x), Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Van Colen, C., Vincx, M. and Degraer, S. (2006) Does medium-term emersion cause a mass extinction of tidal flat macrobenthos?—The case of the Tricolor oil pollution prevention in the Zwin nature reserve. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 68, 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Colen, C., Montserrat, F., Vincx, M., Herman, P.M.J., Ysebaert, T. and Degraer, S. (in press) Macrobenthic recovery from hypoxia in an estuarine tidal mudflat. Marine Ecology Progress Series, doi: 10.3354/meps07640.Google Scholar
Volkenborn, N. and Reise, K. (2007) Effects of Arenicola marina on polychaete functional diversity revealed by large-scale experimental lugworm exclusion. Journal of Sea Research 57, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R.M., Goss-Custard, J.D., Kirby, R., George, C.L., Pope, N.D. and Rowden, A.A. (1991) Static and dynamic environmental factors determining the community structure of estuarine macrobenthos in SW Britain: why is the Severn estuary different? Journal of Applied Ecology 28, 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I.D., van der Meer, J., Dekker, R., Beukema, J.J. and Holmes, S.P. (2004) Exploring interactions among intertidal macrozoobenthos of the Dutch Wadden Sea using population growth models. Journal of Sea Research 52, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolanski, E. (2007) Estuarine ecohydrology, 1st edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ysebaert, T., Herman, P.M.J., Meire, P., Craeymeersch, J., Verbeek, H. and Heip, C.H.R. (2003) Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar