Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:00:34.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Macroalgal fouling communities as indicators of environmental change: potential applications for water quality monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

Veronica Farrugia Drakard*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
Sandro Lanfranco
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
Patrick J. Schembri
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: V. Farrugia Drakard, Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta email: [email protected]

Abstract

Macroalgal fouling communities are potentially useful as bioindicators in environmental monitoring as they are considered to be sensitive to changes in environmental conditions and the use of artificial substrata facilitates the implementation of standardized sampling strategies. The response of macroalgal fouling communities on buoys to changes in water quality was investigated with a view to the possible utilization of these assemblages in environmental monitoring programmes. Seven study sites were selected based on previously collected environmental data and Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was used to order sites according to beam attenuation coefficient (BAC) and concentration of dissolved nitrates and phosphates, relative to a minimally impacted reference site. At each site, all fouling macroalgae were collected from 10 buoys of standard shape and size, and were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level. Species composition and species dominance were highly variable among impacted sites, indicating that qualitative aspects of community structure may not be useful as indicators of changes in water quality. However, higher levels of nutrient enrichment and turbidity were associated with lower macroalgal species richness, lower overall abundances, and decreased diversities, and therefore these quantitative aspects of community structure are potentially useful as indicators of environmental change. Intermediate levels of turbidity and nutrient enrichment were associated with lower evenness, but did not influence species richness, suggesting that macroalgal abundances respond to changes in environmental conditions before species replacement occurs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arévalo, R., Pinedo, S. and Ballesteros, E. (2007) Changes in the composition and structure of Mediterranean rocky-shore communities following a gradient of nutrient enrichment: descriptive study and test of proposed methods to assess water quality regarding macroalgae. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 104113.Google Scholar
Axiak, V. (2004) Monitoring programme for coastal waters. Floriana: PCCU Marine Coastal Monitoring Programme, Malta Environment and Planning Authority, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Ballesteros, E., Torras, X., Pinedo, S., Garcia, M., Mangialajo, L. and de Torres, M. (2007) A new methodology based on littoral community cartography dominated by macroalgae for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 172180.Google Scholar
Becherucci, M.E., Santiago, L., Benavides, H.R. and Vallarino, E.A. (2016) Assessing sewage impact in a South-West Atlantic rocky shore intertidal community. Marine Pollution Bulletin 106, 388394.Google Scholar
Blanfuné, A., Thibaut, T., Boudouresque, C.F., Mačić, V., Markovic, L., Palomba, L., Verlaque, M. and Boissery, P. (2017) The CARLIT method for the assessment of the ecological quality of European Mediterranean waters: relevance, robustness and possible improvements. Ecological Indicators 72, 249259.Google Scholar
Bokn, T.L., Duarte, C.M., Pedersen, M.F., Marba, N., Moy, F.E., Barron, C., Bjerkeng, B., Borum, J., Christie, H., Engelbert, S., Fotel, F.L., Hoell, E.E., Karez, R., Kersting, K., Kraufvelin, P., Lindblad, C., Olsen, M., Sanderud, K.A., Sommer, U. and Sorensen, K. (2003) The response of experimental rocky shore communities to nutrient additions. Ecosystems 6, 577594.Google Scholar
Chapman, A.S. and Fletcher, R.L. (2002) Differential effects of sediments on survival and growth of Fucus serratus embryos (Fucales, Phaeophyceae). Journal of Phycology 38, 894903.Google Scholar
Christie, A.O. and Shaw, M. (1968) Settlement experiments with zoospores of Enteromorpha intestinalis (L.) Link. British Phycological Bulletin 3, 529534.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Cloern, J.E. (2001) Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210, 223253.Google Scholar
Daly, M.A. and Mathieson, A.C. (1977) The effects of sand movement on intertidal seaweeds and selected invertebrates at Bound Rock, New Hampshire, USA. Marine Biology 43, 4555.Google Scholar
Devinny, J.S. and Volse, L.A. (1978) Effects of sediments on the development of Macrocystis pyrifera gametophytes. Marine Biology 48, 343348.Google Scholar
Diez, I., Secilla, A., Santolaria, A. and Gorostiaga, J.M. (1999) Phytobenthic intertidal community structure along an environmental pollution gradient. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38, 463472.Google Scholar
Duarte, C.M. (1995) Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes. Ophelia 41, 87112.Google Scholar
Fabricius, K., De'ath, G., McCook, L., Turak, E. and Williams, D.M. (2005) Changes in algal, coral and fish assemblages along water quality gradients on the inshore Great Barrier Reef. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51, 384398.Google Scholar
Falace, A. and Bressan, G. (2002) Evaluation of the inclination of substrate panels on seasonal changes in a microphytobenthic community. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S116S121.Google Scholar
Firth, L.B., Thompson, R., White, F.J., Schofield, M., Skov, M.W., Hoggart, S.P.G., Jackson, J., Knights, A.M. and Hawkins, S.J. (2013) The importance of water-retaining features for biodiversity on artificial intertidal coastal defence structures. Diversity and Distributions 19, 12751283.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R.L. and Callow, M.E. (1992) The settlement, attachment and establishment of marine algal spores. British Phycological Journal 27, 303329.Google Scholar
Foster, M. (1980) The use of substratum manipulations in field studies of seaweed colonization and growth. In Abbott, I.A., Foster, M.S. and Ekland, L.F. (eds) Pacific seaweed aquaculture. La Jolla, CA: University of California, pp. 2331.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. and Ryan, P.D. (2001) PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Holmes, N.J., Harriott, V.J. and Banks, S.A. (1997) Latitudinal variation in patterns of colonisation of cryptic calcareous marine organisms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 155, 103113.Google Scholar
IBM Corp. (2015) IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Armonk, NY: IBM.Google Scholar
Jones, W.E. and Babb, M.S. (1968) The motile period of swarmers of Enteromorpha intestinalis (L.) Link. British Phycological Bulletin 3, 525528.Google Scholar
Kraufvelin, P., Ruuskanen, A.T., Nappu, N. and Kiirikki, M. (2007) Winter colonisation and succession of filamentous macroalgae on artificial substrates and possible relationships to Fucus vesiculosus settlement in early summer. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72, 665674.Google Scholar
Mayer-Pinto, M. and Junqueira, A.O.R. (2003) Effects of organic pollution on the initial development of fouling communities in a tropical bay, Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46, 14951503.Google Scholar
Okuda, T., Noda, T., Yamamoto, T., Hori, M. and Nakaoka, M. (2010) Contribution of environmental and spatial processes to rocky intertidal metacommunity structure. Acta Oecologica 36, 413422.Google Scholar
Orfanidis, S., Panayotidis, P. and Stamatis, N. (2001) Ecological evaluation of transitional and coastal waters: a marine benthic macrophytes-based model. Mediterranean Marine Science 2, 4565.Google Scholar
Pinedo, S., Garcia, M., Satta, M.P., de Torres, M. and Ballesteros, E. (2007) Rocky-shore communities as indicators of water quality: a case study in the Northwestern Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 126135.Google Scholar
Ramos, E., de Teran, J.R.D., Puente, A. and Juanes, J.A. (2016) The role of geomorphology in the distribution of intertidal rocky macroalgae in the NE Atlantic region. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 179, 9098.Google Scholar
Shepherd, S.A., Watson, J.E., Womersley, H.B.S. and Carey, J.M. (2009) Long-term changes in macroalgal assemblages after increased sedimentation and turbidity in Western Port, Victoria, Australia. Botanica Marina 52, 195206.Google Scholar
Sliskovic, M., Jelic-Mrcelic, G., Antolic, B. and Anicic, I. (2011) The fouling of fish farm cage nets as bioindicator of aquaculture pollution in the Adriatic Sea (Croatia). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 173, 519532.Google Scholar
Worm, B. and Lotze, H.K. (2006) Effects of eutrophication, grazing, and algal bloom on rocky shores. Limnology and Oceanography 51, 569579.Google Scholar