Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:00:24.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Locomotion and visual behaviour of mid-Water crustaceans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Michael F. Land
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG

Extract

Video recordings were made of the behaviour of hyperiid amphipods and other mid-water crustaceans in a tank lit from above with a dim VDU screen, and from behind with infra-red light. Computer-generated stimuli could be moved across the VDU screen. Amphipods swam at speeds up to 19 body lengths per second. Some (Brachyscelus, Phrosina) consistently swam inverted, rolling from side to side. Others (Platyscelus, Parapronoe) spent periods of time rotating in the water with the dorsal acute zone of the eye pointing upwards. Both behaviours are interpreted as forms of visual scanning. Different species were active at different light levels, Phronima preferring the dimmest illumination. Three kinds of visual behaviour were seen consistently. The animals dropped from the surface as a dark square passed above them; they tracked other individuals (Hyperiids) or, in the case of Euphausiids, the stimuli on thescreen above; and they occasionally swam towards each other and collided, apparently deliberately.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bainbridge, R. 1961. Migrations. In The physiology of Crustacea, vol II (ed. Waterman, T.H.), pp. 431463. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, T.E. & Gruner, H. E. 1973. The families and genera of Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Smithsonian Contributmis to Zoology, 146, 164.Google Scholar
Denton, E.J. 1990. Light and vision at depths greater than 200 metres. In Light and life in the sea (ed. Herring, P.J. et al.), pp. 127166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harbison, G.R.Biggs, D.C. & Madin, L.P. 1977. The associations of Amphipoda Hyperiidea with gelatinous zooplankton. II. Associations with Cnidaria, Ctenophora and Radiolaria. Deep-Sea Research, 24, 465488.Google Scholar
Jerlov, N.G. 1968. Optical oceanography. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Land, M.F. 1980. Eye movements and the mechanism of vertical steering in euphausiid Crustacea. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 137, 255265.Google Scholar
Land, M.F. 1981. Optics of the eyes of Phronima and other deep-sea amphipods. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 145, 209226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, M.F. 1982. Scanning eye movements in a heteropod mollusc. Journal of Experimental Biology, 96, 427430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, M.F. 1989. The eyes of hyperiid amphipods: relations of optical structure to depth. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 164, 751762.Google Scholar
Lobel, P.S. & Randall, J.E. 1986. Swarming behavior of the hyperiid amphipod Anchylomera blossevilli. Journal of Plankton Research, 8, 253262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madin, L.P. & Harbison, G.R. 1977. The associations of amphipoda hyperiidea with gelatinous zooplankton. I. Associations with Salpidae. Deep-Sea Research, 24, 449463.Google Scholar
Marshall, N.B. 1979. Developments in Deep-Sea Biology. Poole: Blandford Press.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, W. 1977. Swimming mechanics of variously sized water beetles. In Scale effects in animal locomotion (ed. Pedley, T.J.), pp. 262283. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nilsson, D.-E. 1982. The transparent compound eye of Hyperia (Crustacea): examination with a new method for analysis of refractive index gradients. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 147, 339349.Google Scholar
Thurston, M.H. 1976. The vertical distribution and diurnal migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda collected during the SOND cruise 1965. II. The hyperiidea and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 383470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar