Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:16:26.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Littoral Distributions and Evidence For Differential Post-Settlement Selection of the Morphs of Actinia Equina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. L. J. Quicke ,
A. M. Donoghue ,
T. F. Keeling  and
R. C. Brace
D. L. J. Quicke
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
A. M. Donoghue
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
T. F. Keeling
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
R. C. Brace
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Examination of the intertidal distributions of isozyme and pedal colour phenotypes of Actinia equina L. has shown that anemones displaying column coloration ranging from red to brown, are divisible into three, ecologically distinct forms in Britain, which we currently interpret as being morphs of a single species. These are termed the upper (U), mid (M) and lower (L) shore morphs, which are relatively most abundant on the upper mid, lower mid and low shores, respectively; not all morphs are represented on some shores. The U, M and L morphs may be separated on the basis of their hexokinase and malate dehydrogenase phenotypes. The U morph is homozygous slow and fast respectively, the L morph is slow and fast respectively whilst the M morph is heterozygous at both loci. Data on linkage of pedal disc colour and alleles at a tetrazolium oxidase locus, and of an association between alleles at the hexokinase locus and those at an esterase locus, are given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballantine, W. J., 1961. A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Studies, 1 (3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Black, R. & Johnson, M. S., 1981. Genetic differentiation independent of intertidal gradients in the pulmonate limpet Siphonaria kurracheensis. Marine Biology, 64, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, R. C. & Quicke, D. L. J., 1985. Further analysis of individual spacing within aggregations of the anemone, Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. A. & Thorpe, J. P., 1981. Reproductive, genetic and ecological evidence that Actinia equina var. mesembryanthemum and var. fragacea are not conspecific. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 79–93.Google Scholar
Dalby, D. H., Cowell, E. B., Syratt, W. J. & Crothers, J. H., 1978. An exposure scale for marine shores in western Norway. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 975–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, J. C. & Richardson, B. J., 1980. Allozyme variation between populations of baitfish species Stolephorus heterolobus and St. devisi (Pisces: Engraulidae) and Spratelloides gracilis (Pisces: Dussumieriidae) from Papua New Guinea waters. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Reseach, 31, 701–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoghue, A. M., Quicke, D. L. J. & Brace, R. C., 1985. Biochemical-genetic and acrorhagial characteristics of pedal disc colour phenotypes of Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 21–33.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A., 1977. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. 246 pp. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Flowerdew, M. W. & Crisp, D. J., 1976. Allelic esterase isozymes, their variation with season, position on the shore and stage of development in the cirripede Balanus balanoides. Marine Biology, 35, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesel, J. T., 1970. On the maintenance of a shell pattern and behavioural polymorphism in Acmaea digitalis, a limpet. Evolution, 24, 98—119.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G., 1974. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in randomly mating populations. Heredity, 33, 229–239.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R. J., 1981 a. Evolutionary genetics of Metridium senile. I. Kinetic differences in phosphoglucose isomerase allozymes. Biochemical Genetics, 19, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, R. J., 1981 b. Evolutionary genetics of Metridium senile. II. Geographic patterns of allozyme variation. Biochemical Genetics, 19, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. S. & Black, R., 1982. Chaotic genetic patchiness in an intertidal limpet, Siphonaria sp. Marine Biology, 70, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehl, M. A R., 1976. Mechanical design in sea anemones. In Coelenterate Ecology and Behaviour (ed. Mackie, G. O.), pp. 23–31. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, R. K., Turano, F. J. & Mitton, J. B., 1973. Population genetics of marine pelecypods. II. Genetic differences in microhabitats of Modiolus demissus. Evolution, 27, 100–105.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores, xii, 323 pp. London: English Universities Press Ltd.Google Scholar
McCormack, S. M. D., 1982. The maintenance of shore-level size gradients in an intertidal snail (Littorina sitkana). Oecologia 54, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyse, J. & Nelson-Smith, A., 1963. Zonation of animals and plants on rocky shores around Dale, Pembrokeshire. Field Studies, 1 (5), 1–31.Google Scholar
Newell, R. C., 1979. Biology of Intertidal Animals, 3rd edition. 781 pp. Faversham: Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd.Google Scholar
Ottaway, J. R., 1978. Population ecology of the intertidal anemone Actinia tenebrosa. I. Pedal locomotion and intraspecific aggression. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 29, 787–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J. & Brace, R. C., 1983. Phenotypic and genotypic spacing within an aggregation of the anemone, Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J. & Brace, R. C., 1984. Evidence for the existence of a third, ecologically distinct morph of the anemone, Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 531–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J., Donoghue, A. M., & Brace, R. C., 1983. Biochemical-genetic and ecological evidence that red/brown individuals of the anemone Actinia equina comprise two morphs in Britain. Marine Biology, 77, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1981. Recruitment in a sea anemone population: juvenile substrate becomes adult prey. Science, New York, 213, 785–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1982. Recruitment and habitat selection in the intertidal sea anemones, Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt) and A. xanthogrammica (Brandt). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 59, 103—124.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. R. & Prasad, R., 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes – a compilation of recipes. Biochemical Genetics, 4, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shick, M. J., Hoffmann, R. J. & Lamb, A. N., 1979. Asexual reproduction, population structure, and genotype-environment interactions in sea anemones. American Zoologist, 19, 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G., 1967. Statistical Methods, 6th edition. 593 pp. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Wainwright, S. A. & Koehl, M. A. R., 1976. The nature of flow and the reaction of benthic Cnidariato it. In Coelenterate Ecology and Behaviour (ed. Mackie, G. O.), pp. 5–21. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. J. & Somero, G. N., 1981. Temperature adaptation in sea anemones: physiological and biochemical variability in geographically separate populations of Metridium senile. Marine Biology, 62, 25–34.Google Scholar
Wells, H. & King, J. L., 1980. A general ‘exact test’ for N × M contingency tables. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 79, 65–77.Google Scholar