Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:55:44.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Life-Cycle and Population Dynamics of Streptosyllis Websteri (Polychaeta: Syllidae) from a Northumberland Beach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. R. Garwood
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE30 4PZ

Extract

The population of Streptosyllis websteri at Newton, Northumberland shows epigamous reproduction and has an extended spawning season from April to July, during which there are two main peaks of spawning activity. Most individuals spawn twice in the breeding season at the beginning of their third year of life, although some individuals may contribute to the second spawning peak of the breeding season at the beginning of their second year. Growth rates are remarkably uniform, and year classes are usually clearly distinguishable using setiger number frequency distributions. Observations on growth and mortality suggest that there is competition for resources amongst the new recruitment class over the first few months of life, but that overall survival through the first year is density independent and likely to be determined by external factors. Larval development is largely benthic, and it is unlikely that there is any prolonged truly pelagic larval phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Daly, J. M. 1975. Reversible epitoky in the life history of the polychaete Odontosyllis polycera (Schmarda 1861),. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 327344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, H. D. 1980. Zur Determination der zeitlichen Verteilung von Fortpflanzungsprozessen in Laborkulturen des Polychaeten Typosyllis prolifera. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 34, 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauenschild, C.J 1953. Die phänotypische Geschlechtsbestimmung bei Grubea clavata und vergleichende Beobachtungen an anderen Sylliden. Zoologische Jahrbiicher (Abteilung fur allgemeine Zoologie und Physiologie der Tiere), 64, 1554.Google Scholar
Heacox, A. E. 1980. Reproduction and larval development of Typosyllis pulchra (Berkeley&amp Berkeley) (Polychaeta: Syllidae). Pacific Science, 34, 245259.Google Scholar
Herpin, R. 1925. Recherches biologiques sur la reproduction et le developpement de quelques annelides polychetes. Bulletin de la Socie'te des sciences naturelles de I'ouest de la France, 5, 250 pp..Google Scholar
Malaquin, A. 1890. Sur la reproduction des Autolyteae. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de I'Académie des sciences, 111, 989991.Google Scholar
Malaquin, A. 1893. Recherches sur les syllidiens; morphologie, anatomie, reproduction, développement. Mémoires de la Société des sciences, de l'agriculture et des arts de Lille, 9, 477.Google Scholar
Olive, P. J. W. & Garwood, P. R. 1981. Gametogenic cycle and population structure of Nereis (Hediste) diversicolor and Nereis (Nereis) pelagica from north-east England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 193213.Google Scholar
Potts, F. A. 1911. Methods of reproduction in the syllids. Ergebnisse undfortschritte der Zoologie, 3 172.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E. 1973. Systematics and ecology of the Isef jord marine fauna (Denmark). Ophelia, 11, 495pp.Google Scholar
Schiedges, K. L. 1979. Reproduction biology and ontogenesis in the polychaete genus Autolytus (Annelida: Syllidae): observations on laboratory-cultured individuals. Marine Biology, 54, 239250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar