Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T22:35:50.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Life History of Kellia Suborbicularis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Marie V. Lebour
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory

Extract

Kellia suborbicularis (Montagu) has long been known to be viviparous. Lovén (1848) mentions this fact and Jeffreys (1863, p. 227) quotes Mr Clark who “found in the ovary of one individual ova in an advanced state with fully formed testaceous fry.” It is probable, however, that these shelled larvae were in reality contained in the gill pouch where later workers have found them. Pelseneer (1935, p. 517) says that the eggs are incubated in the internal gill lamella, and this was also observed by myself.

It is striking that although the shelled larva is extremely small when liberated (shell 0.064–0.08 mm. in length), the late planktonic larva is very large (shell 0.30–0.37 mm. in length) and one of the most conspicuous bivalve veligers in the plankton. This indicates a prolonged free-swimming life quite unlike that of the oyster, Ostraea edulis, whose shelled larvae are liberated only to lose the velum in a few days. These late larvae of Kellia have been kept in bowls and plunger jars in the Plymouth Laboratory until they metamorphosed and for months afterwards, growing into beautifully clear and transparent individuals which undoubtedly belonged to this species.

Kellia suborbicularis is placed by Winckworth (1932) in the Erycinidae, but this family is closely related to the Leptonidae, Montacutidae and Galeommatidae, most or all of whose members are viviparous. Lovén (1848) described the young shelled stage of Montacuta ferruginosa and M. bidentata, the latter species now being referred by Winckworth toMysella. Both keep their young in the gill pouch until the shelled stage and Lovén's beautiful figures show that the early shelled stage in each of them is very like that of Kellia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jeffreys, J. G., 1863. British Conchology, Vol. II, pp.1464.Google Scholar
Lovén, S., 1848. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Entwicklung der Mollusca Acephala Lamellibranchiata. Abhandl. K. Schwed. Ak. Wiss., 1848. (Republished in 1879 at Stockholm with additional notes, pp. 139.)Google Scholar
Montagu, G., 1863. Testacea Britannica, pp. 1606.Google Scholar
Odhner, N. H. 1914. Notizen über die Fauna der Adria bei Rovigno. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der marinen Molluskenfauna von Rovigno in Istrien. Zool. Anz., Bd. XLIV, 4, pp. 156–70.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1935. Essai d'ethologie zoologique des Mollusques. Acad. Roy. Belgique Cl. Sci. Publications de la Fondation Agathen de Potter, No.1, pp. 1662.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1932. The British Marine Mollusca. Journ. Conch., Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 211–52.Google Scholar