Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:45:54.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Length–weight relationships of 216 North Sea benthic invertebrates and fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

L.A. Robinson ,
S.P.R. Greenstreet ,
H. Reiss ,
R. Callaway ,
J. Craeymeersch ,
I. de Boois ,
S. Degraer ,
S. Ehrich ,
H.M. Fraser  and
A. Goffin
...Show all authors
L.A. Robinson*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Ecosystem Dynamics Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
S.P.R. Greenstreet
Affiliation:
Fisheries Research Services, Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK
H. Reiss
Affiliation:
Senckenberg Institute, Department of Marine Science, Südstrand 40, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
R. Callaway
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
J. Craeymeersch
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research (IMARES), PO Box 77, 4400 AB Yerseke, The Netherlands
I. de Boois
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research (IMARES), PO Box 77, 4400 AB Yerseke, The Netherlands
S. Degraer
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B 9000, Gent, Belgium
S. Ehrich
Affiliation:
Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Institute of Sea Fisheries, Palmaille 9, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
H.M. Fraser
Affiliation:
Fisheries Research Services, Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK
A. Goffin
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B 9000, Gent, Belgium
I. Kröncke
Affiliation:
Senckenberg Institute, Department of Marine Science, Südstrand 40, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
L. Lindal Jorgenson
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Research, Box 1870, 5817 Bergen, Norway
M.R. Robertson
Affiliation:
Fisheries Research Services, Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK
J. Lancaster
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: L.A. Robinson, Ecosystem Dynamics Group School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Size-based analyses of marine animals are increasingly used to improve understanding of community structure and function. However, the resources required to record individual body weights for benthic animals, where the number of individuals can reach several thousand in a square metre, are often prohibitive. Here we present morphometric (length–weight) relationships for 216 benthic species from the North Sea to permit weight estimation from length measurements. These relationships were calculated using data collected over two years from 283 stations. For ten abundant and widely dispersed species we tested for significant spatial and temporal differences in morphometric relationships. Some were found, but the magnitude of differences was small in relation to the size-ranges of animals that are usually present and we recommend that the regression relationships given here, based on pooled data, are appropriate for most types of population and community analyses. Our hope is that the availability of these morphometric relationships will encourage the more frequent application of size-based analyses to benthic survey data, and so enhance understanding of the ecology of the benthic/demersal component of marine ecosystems and food webs.

Keywords

length–weight relationshipsbenthosdemersal fishsize structuresize-based analyses
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 95 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bianchi, G., Gislason, H., Graham, K., Hill, L., Jin, X., Koranteng, K., Manickchand-Heileman, S., Payá, I., Sainsbury, K., Sanchez, F. and Zwanenburg, K. (2000) Impact of fishing on size composition and diversity of demersal fish communities. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 558–571.Google Scholar
Blanchard, J.L., Dulvy, N.K., Jennings, S., Ellis, J.R., Pinnegar, J.K., Tidd, A. and Kell, L.T. (2005) Do climate and fishing influence size-based indicators of Celtic Sea fish community structure? ICES Journal of Marine Science 62, 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brey, T. (1990) Estimating productivity of macrobenthic invertebrates from biomass and mean individual weight. Meeresforschung 32, 329–343.Google Scholar
Brey, T., Jarre-Teichmann, A. and Borlich, O. (1996) Artificial neural network versus multiple linear regression: predicting P/B ratios from empirical data. Marine Ecology Progress Series 140, 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.H., Gillooly, J.F., Allen, A.P., Savage, V.M. and West, G.B. (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771–1789.Google Scholar
Callaway, R., Alsvag, J., de Boois, I., Cotter, J., Ford, A., Hinz, H., Jennings, S., Kröncke, I., Lancaster, J., Piet, G., Prince, P. and Ehrich, S. (2002a) Diversity and community structure of epibenthic invertebrates and fish in the North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, 1199–1214.Google Scholar
Callaway, R., Jennings, S., Lancaster, J. and Cotter, J. (2002b) Mesh-size matters in epibenthic surveys. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R., Robinson, L.A., Greenstreet, S.P.R., Reiss, H., Fraser, H.M., Kröncke, I., Craeymeersch, J., de Boois, I., Robertson, M., Lancaster, J. and Goffin, A. (2007) Methodology for the combined sampling of marine groundfish and benthic invertebrate communities. FRS Collaborative Report 11/07, 23 pp. plus annexes.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.E., Jonsson, T. and Carpenter, S.R. (2003) Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance and body size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 100, 1781–1786.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.E., Pimm, S.L., Yodzis, P. and Saldana, J. (1993) Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 62, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coull, K.A., Jermyn, A.S., Newton, A.W., Henderson, G.I. and Hall, W.B. (1989) Length/weight relationships for 88 species of fish encountered in the north east Atlantic. Scottish Fisheries Research Report 43, 81 pp.Google Scholar
Cushing, D.H. (1975) Marine ecology and fisheries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duplisea, D.E., Jennings, S., Warr, K.J. and Dinmore, T.A. (2002) A size-based model of the impacts of bottom trawling on benthic community structure. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 1785–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, G.J. (1990) The use of the size structure of benthic macro-faunal communities to estimate faunal biomass and secondary production. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 137, 195–214.Google Scholar
Frauenheim, K., Neumann, V., Thiel, H. and Türkay, M. (1989) The distribution of the larger epifauna during summer and winter in the North Sea and its suitability for environmental monitoring. Senckenbergiana Maritima 20, 101–118.Google Scholar
Greenstreet, S.P.R., McMillan, J.A. and Armstrong, F. (1998) Seasonal variation in the importance of pelagic fish in the diet of piscivorous fish in the Moray Firth, NE Scotland: a response to variation in prey abundance? ICES Journal of Marine Science 55, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstreet, S.P.R. and Rogers, S.I. (2006) Indicators of the health of the fish community of the North Sea: identifying reference levels for an ecosystem approach to management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63, 573–593.Google Scholar
Jennings, S. and Blanchard, J.L. (2004) Fish abundance with no fishing: predictions based on macro-ecological theory. Journal of Animal Ecology 73, 632–642.Google Scholar
Jennings, S., De Oliveira, J.A.A. and Warr, K.J. (2007) Measurement of body size and abundance in tests of macro-ecological and food web theory. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 72–82.Google Scholar
Jennings, S., Lancaster, J., Woolmer, A. and Cotter, J. (1999) Distribution, diversity and abundance of epibenthic fauna in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 385–399.Google Scholar
Jennings, S. and Mackinson, S. (2003) Abundance–body mass relationships in size-structured food webs. Ecology Letters 6, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, S., Warr, K.J. and Mackinson, S. (2002a) Use of size-based production and stable isotope analyses to predict trophic transfer efficiencies and predator–prey body mass ratios in food webs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 240, 11–20.Google Scholar
Jennings, S., Pinnegar, J.K., Polunin, N.V.C. and Warr, K.J. (2002b) Linking size-based and trophic analyses of benthic community structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series 226, 77–85.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M.J., Ramsay, K. and Hughes, R.N. (1998) Can fisheries influence interspecific competition in sympatric populations of hermit crabs? Journal of Natural History 32, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, S.R. and Dickie, L.M. (2001) The biomass spectrum: a predator–prey theory of aquatic production. New York: Columbia University Press, 320 pp.Google Scholar
Persson, L. (1988) Asymmetries in competitive and predatory interactions in fish populations. In Ebenman, B. and Persson, L. (eds) Size-structured populations: ecology and evolution. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, J.G., Rice, J.C., Daan, N., Jennings, S. and Gislason, H. (2006) Modelling an exploited marine fish community with 15 parameters—results from a simple size-based model. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63, 1029–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, H., Neumann, H. and Kröncke, I. (2005) Chela-height vs. body-weight relationships for North Sea hermit crabs (Paguridae). ICES Journal of Marine Science 62, 723–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, H., Degraer, S., Duineveld, G., Kröncke, I., Craeymeersch, J., Rachor, E., Aldridge, J.N., Eggleton, J., Hillewaert, H., Lavaleye, M., Moll, A., Pohlmann, T., Robertson, M., Vanden Berghe, E., van Hoey, G., Rees, H.L. (in press) Spatial patterns of infauna epifauna and demersal fish communities in the North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science.Google Scholar
Rice, J. and Gislason, H. (1996) Patterns of change in the size spectra of numbers and diversity of the North Sea fish assemblage, as reflected in surveys and models. ICES Journal of Marine Science 53, 1214–1225.Google Scholar