Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:55:57.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Larval Shell of Some Prosobranch Gastropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Vera Fretter
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Berkshire
Margaret C. Pilkington*
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Berkshire
*
*Present address: Portobello Marine Biological Station, Portobello, New Zealand.

Extract

Growth of shells of larvae of Nassarius reticulatus (L.) and Crepidula fornicata (L.) reared in the laboratory under constant temperature (14 °C) and illumination (155 lx) occurs by the addition of successive strips secreted at the mantle edge. Growth lines on the embryonic teloconch also indicate intermittent growth; the protoconch secreted by the shell gland has no such lines. There is evidence that growth periods are short and pauses separating them prolonged. The diameter of the older whorls of the shells of these and six other species examined increase with the volume of the viscera. This change in diameter is made possible by the flexibility of the organic matrix, the funda-mental constituent of the shell. The matrix, secreted as fibres at the mantle edge, forms sheets, and provides sites for the deposition of calcareous concretions; at metamorphosis the concretions apparently initiate the formation of crystals. The concretions also sculpture the surface of the shell producing a pattern sufficiently conspicuous to allow identification of some species with the aid of only the stereomicroscope. For example, large concretions form longitudinal rows over the protoconch and teloconch of Littorina neritoides (L.) and smaller ones combine to form a more decorative pattern in Rissoa sarsi Loven. In other species details of the surface design require a scanning electron micro-scope. Interspecific differences in the arrangement of concretions may be traceable to differences in the pallial glands which secrete the matrix.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, R. M., 1964. Microtextural variation in pelecypod shells. Malacologia, Vol. 2, pp. 6986.Google Scholar
Choe, S., 1963. Daily age markings on the shell of cuttlefishes. Nature, Lond., Vol. 197, pp. 306–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, D. R., 1937. The development of Haliotis tuberculata, with special reference to the organogenesis during torsion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, Vol. 208, pp. 219–68.Google Scholar
Crofts, D. R., 1955. Muscle morphogenesis in primitive gastropods and its relation to torsion. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 125, pp. 711–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W. H., 1924. The value of the nuclear characters in the classification of marine gastropods. J. Wash. Acad. Sci., Vol. 14, pp. 177–80.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1969. Aspects of metamorphosis in prosobranch gastropods. Proc. malac. Soc. Lond., Vol. 38, pp. 375–86.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Pilkington, M. C., 1970. Prosobranchia. Veliger larvae of Taenioglossa and Stenoglossa. Fich. Idem. Zoopl., Sheets 129–32, 22 pp.Google Scholar
Grégoire, C., Duchâteau, G. & Florkin, M., 1955. La trame protidique des nacres et des perles. Annls Jnst. océanogr., Monaco, T. 31, pp. 136.Google Scholar
Grégoire, C., 1957. Topography of the organic components in mother-of-pearl. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol, Vol. 3, pp. 797808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grégoire, C., 1960. Further studies on structure of the organic components in mother-of-pearl, especially in pelecypods (Part 1). Bull. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg., T. 36, pp. 122.Google Scholar
House, M. R. & Farrow, G. E., 1968. Daily growth banding in the shell of the cockle, Cardium edule. Nature, Lond., Vol. 219, pp. 1384–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessel, E., 1933. Uber die Schale von Viviparus viviparus L. und Viviparus fasciatus Mull. Ein Beitrag zum Strukturproblem der Gastropodenschale. Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere, Bd. 27, pp. 129–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapstone, G. M., 1970. Feeding activities of veligers of Nassarius reticulatus (L.) and Crepidula fornicata (L.) and the use of artificial foods in maintaining cultures of these larvae. Helgoldnder zviss. Meeresunters., Bd. 20, pp. 565–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, A. C., 1967. Daily growth layers in animals and plants. Biol. Rev., Vol. 42, pp. 421–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannella, G. & Macclintock, C., 1968. Biological and environmental rhythms reflected in molluscan shell growth. J. Palaeont., Vol. 42, pp. 6480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, M. C. & Fretter, V., 1970. Some factors affecting the growth of prosobranch veligers. Helgoldnder zviss. Meeresunters., Bd. 20, pp. 576–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R. S., 1962. Pelagic larvae of New England intertidal gastropods. 1. Nassarius obsoletus Say and Nassarius vibex Say. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc, Vol. 81, pp. 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watabe, N., Sharp, D. G. & Wilbur, K. M., 1958. Studies on shell formation. VIII. Electron microscopy of crystal growth of the nacreous layer of the oyster Crassostrea virginica. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol., Vol. 4, pp. 281–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watabe, N. & Wilbur, K. M., 1961. Studies on shell formation. IX. An electron microscope study of crystal layer formation in the oyster. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol., Vol. 9, pp. 761–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, B., 1955. Uber die Anatomie, die Entwicklung und Biologie des Veligers und der Veliconcha von Crepidulafornicata L. (GastropodaProsobranchia). Helgoldnder wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 5, pp. 169217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar