Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:08:00.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Larval development of the Pacific sandperch (Prolatilus jugularis) (Pisces: Pinguipedidae) from the Independencia Bight, Pisco, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2003

Jose A. Vélez*
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstrasse, D–27568 Bremerhaven, Germany
William Watson
Affiliation:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, CA 92037–1508, USA
Elaine M. Sandknop
Affiliation:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, CA 92037–1508, USA
Wolf Arntz
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstrasse, D–27568 Bremerhaven, Germany
*
Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Morphological development of larval Prolatilus jugularis from Bahia Independencia, Pisco, Peru is described. Two hundred and thirty-two specimens were collected with plankton nets in 2000; a developmental series of 40 individuals (2.5–25.9 mm: recently hatched through transformation) was assembled using morphological features and pigmentation. Prolatilus jugularis hatches at approximately 2.5 mm, notochord flexion begins at ∼5.7 mm and ends at ∼6.9 mm, and transformation begins at an unknown size between 14.2–20.3 mm (probably near 20 mm). Diagnostic features of the larvae include a robust body with large head bearing small preopercular spines that begin to form by late preflexion stage; preanal length just under half of body length early in the preflexion stage increasing to near two-thirds of body length in the postflexion stage; and pigmentation primarily on the snout, opercular region, dorsally on the head and gut, laterally above the hindgut, and on the ventral margin of the tail through early flexion stage. A broad mid-lateral stripe begins to form on the trunk and tail late in the flexion stage and dorsal pigmentation forms on the trunk and tail in the postflexion stage. Pectoral-fin rays are first to begin forming, in mid-preflexion stage, followed by principal caudal-fin rays, then by pelvic-, dorsal- and anal-fin rays which apparently begin to form simultaneously near the end of preflexion stage. The dorsal fin is long and continuous, with III–IV short spines and 27–29 soft rays, the anal fin contains 21–23 rays, the first one or two of which may be spine-like, the pelvic fins, with I spine, 5 rays, are below or slightly in front of the pectorals (18–20 rays), and there are 9+8 principal caudal-fin rays and 36–37 myomeres.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fischer, K.W., 1958. Primeras fases del desarrollo del Blanquillo (Prolatilus jugularis) Cuv. Et. Val. (Pisces). Revista de Biologia Marina. Publicado por la Estaciön de Biologia Marina de la Universidad de Chile, 3, nos. 1, 2 & 3, 3–27.Google Scholar
Gu«nther, A., 1860. Catalogue offishes of the British Museum. London: Trustees of the British Museum, Part II. Kendall, A.W. & Matarese, A.C., 1994. Status of early life history descriptions of marine teleosts. Fishery Bulletin, 92, 725–736.Google Scholar
Leis, J.M. & Carson-Ewart, B.M., 2000. The larvae of Indopacific coastal fishes: an Identification guide to marine fish larvae. Fauna Malesiana handbook, no. 2. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Moser, H.G., 1996. The early stages offishes in the California Current region. In California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Atlas no. 33 (ed. H.G. Moser), pp. 1–1503. Lawrence: Allen-Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Richards, W.J., 1985. Status of the identification of the early life stages offishes. Bulletin of Marine Science, 37, 756–760.Google Scholar
Rosa, I.L. & Rosa, R.S., 1987. Pinguipes Cuvier and Valenciennes and Pinguipedidae Gu«nther, the valid names for the fish taxa usually known as Mugiloides and Mugiloididae. Copeia, 4, 1048–1051.Google Scholar
Rosa, I.L. & Rosa, R.S., 1997. Systematic revision of the South American species of Pinguipedidae (Teleostei, Trachinoidei). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 14, 845–865.Google Scholar