Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:19:33.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intertidal activity, breeding and the floating habit of Hydrobia ulvae in the Ythan estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. Anderson
A. Anderson
Affiliation:
Culterty Field Station, University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Ecological studies of Eider Somateria mollisima, Shelduck Tadorna tadorna, Redshank Tringa totanus [Aves], and Flounder Platichythys flesus [Osteichthys], in the estuary of the River Ythan, Aberdeenshire, have entailed investigations of their food requirements, and there is evidence to suggest that Hydrobia ulvae [Gastopoda], as a numerous food item common to all, may in some instances have influenced their breeding success and numbers in some years. In order to get an index of abundance of Hydrobia, the Ythan population has been sampled four times a year since May 1963. The full results of this sampling programme are being published separately. At the same time data on the annual cycle of Hydrobia were collected from one area (transect number 3, Fig. 1), on the assumption that breeding onset and intensity would be the same in other parts of the estuary in any one year.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , May 1971 , pp. 423 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clay, E., 1960. Literature Survey of the Common Fauna of Estuaries, No. 8, Hydrobia ulvae Pennant, H. ventrosa Montagu and Potamopyrgus jenkinsi Smith, 26 pp. I.C.I. Paints div., Brixham Res. Memorandum PVM45/B/483.Google Scholar
Henking, H., 1894. Beitrage zur Kenntnis von Hydrobia ulvae Perm, und deren Brutpflege. Ber naturf. Ges. Freiburg, Bd. 8, pp. 89–110.Google Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1949. The fauna of sand and mud banks near the mouth of the Exe estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass., U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 189–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krull, H., 1935. Anatomische Untersuchungen an einheimischen Prosobranchieren und Beitrage zur Phylogenie der Gastropoden. Zool. Jb. (Anat. Ontog.), Bd. 60, pp. 399–464.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1937. The eggs and larvae of the British prosobranchs with special reference to those living in the plankton. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 105–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linke, O., 1939. Die Biota des Jadebusenwattes. Helgolander wiss Meeresunters, Bd. 1, pp. 201–348.Google Scholar
Newell, R., 1962. Behavioural aspects of the ecology of Peringia ( = Hydrobia) ulvae (Pennant). (Gasteropoda, Prosobranchia). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 138, pp. 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R., 1964. Some factors controlling the upstream distribution of Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Gasteropoda, Prosobranchia). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 142, pp. 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1926. La proportion relative des sexes chez les animaux et particulièrement chez les mollusques. Mém. Acad. r. Belg., Cl. Sci., T. 8, pp. 1–258.Google Scholar
Quick, H. E., 1924. Length of life of Paludestrina ulvae. J. Conch., Lond., Vol. 17, p. 169.Google Scholar
Rothschild, A. & Rothschild, M., 1939. Some observations on the growth of Peringia ulvae (Pennant) 1777 in the laboratory. Novit. zool., Vol. 41, pp. 240–7.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M., 1936. Preliminary note on the trematode parasites of Peringia ulvae (Pennant) 1777. Novit. zool., Vol. 39, pp. 268–9.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M., 1940. Rearing animals in captivity for the study of trematode life histories. 2. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 613–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simroth, H., 1895. Die Gastropoden der Plankton. Plankton Expedition der Humbolt-Stiftung. Ergebn. Atlant. Ocean Plankton exped., Bd. 2, F.d., pp. 1–206.Google Scholar
Smidt, E. L. B., 1951. Animal production in the Danish Waddensea. Meddr Kommn Danm. Fisk.-og Havunders, Ser. Fisk., Bd. 11, No. 6, pp. 1–151.Google Scholar
Steele, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H., 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York/Toronto/ London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Stopford, S. C., 1951. An ecological survey of the Cheshire foreshore of the Dee estuary. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 20, pp. 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thamdrup, H. M., 1935. Beitrage zue Okologie der Wattenfauna auf experiment Uer Grundlage. Meddr Kommn Danm. Fisk-ogx Havunders, Ser. Fisk., Bd. 10, No. 2, 125 pp.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the sound (Øresund). Meddr Kommn Danm. Fisk-og Havunders, Ser. Plank., Bd. 4, No. 1, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities. In: Marine ecology and Paleoecology. 1. Ecology. Mem. geol. Soc. Am., No. 67.Google Scholar
Todd, M. E., 1964. Osmotic balance in Hydrobia ulvae and Potamopyrgus Jenkinsi (Gastropoda; Hydrobiidae). J. Exp. Biol., Vol. 41, pp. 665–77.Google Scholar