Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:38:12.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of water flow rate on Pumping Rate in Mytilus Edulis using a Refined Direct Measurement Apparatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. I. Hildreth
D. I. Hildreth
Affiliation:
N.E.R.C. Unit of Marine Invertebrate Biology, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, Gwynedd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Work on pumping and filtration rates of bivalve molluscs was initially concerned with the physiological concept of pumping water through the mantle cavity. Comprehensive reviews are given by Winter (1970) and Ali (1971). The methods are of two kinds; direct, in which the flow of exhaled water itself is measured, and indirect, in which the rate of clearance of food particles is used to calculate water flow through the gills.

There is a disadvantage in the indirect method when used to calculate volumes of water pumped because it involves the assumption that a fixed percentage (often 100% with large particles) of the particulate matter passing through the gill system is retained. Pumping rate is thus estimated as a function of the particle collecting properties of the latero-frontal cirri, whereas the water current is produced by the lateral cilia. Although the structure of the latero-frontal cirri is now well documented (Moore, 1971), their efficiency in particle retention can alter under certain conditions (Dral, 1967). There is need, therefore, for direct measurement of the quantity of water pumped. Recent advances in the understanding of branchial innervation and the control of lateral ciliary activity also reinforce this point (Aiello, 1960, 1962, 1970; Paparo, 1972, 1973).

The constant level chamber for direct measurement of pumping rate was devised by Galtsoff (1926), to ensure that separation of the exhalant water current from the bivalve was not interfered with by pressure differences produced by the process of separation. The apparatus has been used in various forms by Galtsoff (1926, 1928, 1946), Nelson (1935, 1936), Collier & Ray (1948), Loosanoff & Engle (1947), Loosanoff & Nomejko (1946) and more recently by Drinnan (1964) and Davids (1964).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , May 1976 , pp. 311 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiello, E. L., 1960. Factors affecting ciliary activity on the gill of the mussel Mytilus edulis. Physiological Zoölogy, 33, 120–135.Google Scholar
Aiello, E. L., 1962. Identification of the cilio excitatory substance present in the gill of the mussel, Mytilus edulis. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology, 60, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiello, E. L., 1970. Nervous and chemical stimulation of the gill cilia in bivalve molluscs. Physiological Zoölogy, 43, 60–70.Google Scholar
Ali, R. M., 1971. Factors Influencing Rates of Filter Feeding in Marine Bivalves. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Collier, A. & Ray, S. M., 1948. An automatic proportioning apparatus for the experimental study of the effect of chemical solutions on aquatic animals. Science, New York, 107, 576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davids, C., 1964. The influence of suspensions of microorganisms of different concentrations on pumping and retention of food by the mussel (Mytilus edulis L.). Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 2, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dral, A. D. G., 1967. The movements of the latero-frontal cilia and the mechanism of particle retention in the mussel (Mytilus edulis L.). Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 3, 391–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinnan, R. E., 1964. An apparatus for recording the water pumping behaviour of lamellibranchs. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 2, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S., 1926. New methods to measure the rate of flow produced by the gills of oysters and other Mollusca. Science, New York, 63, 233–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S., 1928. Experimental study of the function of oyster gills and its bearing on problems of oyster culture and sanitary control in the oyster industry. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, Washington, 44, 1–39.Google Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S., 1946. Reaction of oysters to chlorination. Research Report. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 2, 1–28.Google Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S., 1964. The American oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fishery Bulletin. Fish and Wildlife Service. United States Department of the Interior, 64, 480.Google Scholar
Hildreth, D. I. & Crisp, D. J., 1976. A corrected formula for calculation of filtration rate of bivalve molluscs in an experimental flowing system. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby-Smith, W. W., 1972. Growth of the bay scallop: influence of experimental water currents. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 8, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. & Engle, J. B., 1947. Effect of different concentrations of micro-organisms on the feeding of oysters (O. virginica). Fishery Bulletin. Fish and Wildlife Service. United States Department of the Interior, 51, 31–57.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. & Nomejko, C. A., 1946. Feeding of oysters in relation to tidal stages and to periods of light and darkness. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 90, 244–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. J., 1971. The structure of the latero-frontal cirri on the gills of certain lamellibranch molluscs and their role in suspension feeding. Marine Biology, 11, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. C., 1935. Water filtration by the oyster and a new hormone effect thereon. Anatomical Record, 64 (Suppl. 1), 68.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. C., 1936. Water filtration by the oyster and a new hormone effect upon the rate of flow. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 34, 189–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparo, A., 1972. Innervation of the lateral cilia in the mussel Mytilus edulis. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 143, 592–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paparo, A., 1973. Innervation of the gill epithelium of the bivalve Elliptio complanata. Comparative and General Pharmacology, 4, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theede, H., 1963. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Filtrierleistung der Miesmuschel Mytilus edulis L. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 19, 20–41.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. J. & Bayne, B. L., 1972. Active metabolism associated with feeding in the mussel Mytilus edulis L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 9, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walne, P. R., 1972. The influence of current speed, body size and water temperature on the filtration rate of five species of bivalves. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, J. E., 1969. On the influence of food concentration and other factors on filtration rates and food utilisation in the mussels Arctica islandica and Modiolus modiolus. Marine Biology, 4, 87–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, J. E., 1970. Filter feeding and food utilisation in Arctica islandica L. and Modiolus modiolus L. at different food concentrations. In Marine Food Chains (ed. Steele, J. H.), pp. 196–206. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar