Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:58:17.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of trematodes on the macroalgae consumption by the common periwinkle Littorina littorea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Karin T. Clausen ,
Martin H. Larsen ,
Nina K. Iversen  and
Kim N. Mouritsen
Karin T. Clausen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Aarhus, Finlandsgade 14, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Martin H. Larsen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Aarhus, Finlandsgade 14, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Nina K. Iversen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Aarhus, Finlandsgade 14, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Kim N. Mouritsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Aarhus, Finlandsgade 14, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Kim N. Mouritsen, Department of Biological Sciences, Marine Ecology, University of Aarhus, Finlandsgade 14, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trematodes are ubiquitous elements of coastal ecosystems that commonly modify the phenotype of their invertebrate hosts, often with ramifications to higher levels of ecological organization. In this context, trematode infections have been suggested to reduce the consumption of the herbivorous gastropod Littorina littorea (L.) (Mollusca: Gastropoda), in turn affecting the composition of the macroalgal community on which the snail grazes. Here, we examine the effect of two species of trematodes, Renicola roscovita and Himasthla elongata, on L. littorea's consumption in two outdoor microcosm experiments offering the snails two different ephemeral green algae species as a food source. Our results show that, irrespective of the species of parasite and food source, infection decreases consumption: uninfected snails consumed up to 65% more macroalgal biomass than infected snails. Aside from infection status, gender and size also influenced the snails' consumption rate significantly. The differing histopathological impacts of the two species of trematodes on the hosts' gonad–digestive gland complex (in which the parasites reside), suggests that parasitic castration is a likely mechanism for the reduced energy demand of infected periwinkles. Together with existing evidence, our investigation suggests that trematodes in general depress the grazing activity of L. littorea, and that the resulting community regulation occurs throughout the snails' distributional range.

Keywords

consumptionEnteromorpha intestinalisHimasthla elongatamacroalgae communityparasitesRenicola roscovitaUlva lactuca
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 7 , November 2008 , pp. 1481 - 1485
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Begon, M., Townsend, C.R. and Harper, J.L. (2006) Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Bertness, M.D. (1999) The ecology of Atlantic shorelines. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Blakeslee, A.M.H. and Byers, J.E. (2008) Using parasites to inform ecological history: comparisons among three congeneric marine snails in North America and Europe. Ecology 89, 1068–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.E., Blakeslee, A.M.H., Linder, E., Cooper, A.B. and Maguire, T.J. (2008) Controls of spatial variation in the prevalence of trematode parasites infecting a marine snail. Ecology 89, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combes, C. (2001) Parasitism: the ecology and evolution of intimate interactions: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, L.A. (2002) Ecology of larval trematodes in three marine gastropods. Parasitology 124, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, P. and Greenman, J. (1998) Competition mediated by parasites: biological and theoretical progress. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 387–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, R.N. and Answer, P. (1982) Growth, spawning and trematode infection of Littorina littorea from an exposed shore in North Wales. Journal of Molluscan Studies 48, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxham, M., Raffaelli, D. and Pike, A. (1993) The influence of Cryptocotyle lingua (Digenea: Platyhelminthes) infections on the survival and fecundity of Littorina littorea (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia); an ecological approach. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 168, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, B.L. (1968) The distribution and keys of species in the family Littorinidae and their digenean parasites, in the region of Dale, Pembrokeshire. Field Studies 2, 615–650.Google Scholar
Lauckner, G. (1980) Diseases of Mollusca: Gastropoda. In Kinne, O. (ed.) Diseases of marine animals, Volume 1. Hamburg: Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, pp. 311–424.Google Scholar
Lauckner, G. (1987) Ecological effects of larval trematoda infestation on littoral marine invertebrate populations. International Journal for Parasitology 17, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lein, T.E. (1980) The effects of Littorina littorea L. (Gastropoda) grazing on littoral green algae in the inner Oslofjord, Norway. Sarsia, 65, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubchenco, J. (1978) Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities. American Naturalist 112, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, K.N., Gorbushin, A. and Jensen, K.T. (1999) Influence of trematode infections on in situ growth rates of Littorina littorea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, K.N. and Poulin, R. (2002) Parasitism, community structure and biodiversity in intertidal ecosystems. Parasitology 124, S101–S117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouritsen, K.N. and Poulin, R. (2005) Parasitism can influence the intertidal zonation of non-host organisms. Marine Biology 148, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, S.C. and Callaway, R.M. (1996) Impact of a parasitic plant on the structure and dynamics of salt marsh vegetation. Ecology 77, 1410–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. (2007) Evolutionary ecology of parasites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Mouritsen, K.N. (2006) Climate change, parasitism and the structure of intertidal ecosystems. Journal of Helminthology 80, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robson, E.M. and Williams, I.C. (1970) Relationships of some species of digenea with the marine prosobranch Littorina littorea (L.). I. The occurrence of larval digenea in L. littorea on the north Yourkshire coast. Journal of Helminthology 44, 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F., Bonsall, M.B. and Dobson, A.P. (2005) Parasitism, biodiversity, and conservation. In Thomas, F., Renaud, F. and Guegan, J-F. (eds.) Parasitism and ecosystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werding, B. (1969) Morphologie, entwicklung und ökologie digener trematoden-larven der strandschnecke Littorina littorea. Marine Biology 3, 306–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, C.H. and Gross, P.R. (1957) Pigmentation in the foot of Littorina littorea as a means of recognition of infection with trematode larvae. Journal of Parasitology 43, 324–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, C.L., Byers, J.E., Cottingham, K.L., Altman, I., Donahue, M.J. and Blakeslee, A.M.H. (2007) Parasites alter community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 9335–9339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed