Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:28:09.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of substratum colour on the recruitment of macrofouling communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2010

S. Satheesh*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Scott Christian College (Autonomous), Nagercoil-629003, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Godwin Wesley
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Scott Christian College (Autonomous), Nagercoil-629003, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: S. Satheesh, Centre for Marine Science and Technology, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Marina Campus, Rajakamangalam-629502, Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India email: [email protected]

Abstract

Settlement of the fouling community is generally influenced by the physical, chemical and biological properties of the settling surface. The colour of the substratum may also exert an influence on larval settlement. In the present study, the influence of surface colour on the recruitment of fouling communities was investigated by suspending acrylic panels (red, green, blue, white and yellow) in coastal waters. Results showed that the colour of the substratum plays an important role in the recruitment of sessile species. Recruitment was comparatively high on red and blue coloured surfaces. Barnacle and tubeworm recruitment showed significant variation (Tukey test, P < 0.05) between different coloured surfaces. The significant conclusion of this study is that the colour of the artificial substrata should be taken into consideration when interpreting results from short-term biofouling studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakus, G.J. (1988) Practical and theoretical problems in the use of fouling panels. In Thompson, M.F., Nagabushanam, R. and Sarojini, R. (eds) Marine biodeterioration: advanced techniques applicable to the Indian Ocean. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH, pp. 619630.Google Scholar
Bers, A.V. and Wahl, M. (2004) The influence of natural surface microtopographies on fouling. Biofouling 20, 4351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callow, M.E. and Callow, J.A. (2000) Substratum location and zoospore behaviour in the fouling alga Enteromorpha. Biofouling 15, 4956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisp, D.J. (1974) Factors influencing the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. In Grant, P.T. and Mackie, A.M. (eds) Chemoreception in marine organisms. London: Academic Press, pp. 177265.Google Scholar
Daniel, A. (1963) Factors influencing the settlement of marine foulers and borers in tropical seas. In Proceedings of First Summer School of Zoology (Shimla, 1961). New Delhi: Government of India, pp. 363382.Google Scholar
Dahlem, C., Moran, P.J. and Grant, T.R. (1984) Larval settlement of marine sessile invertebrates on surfaces of different colour and position. Ocean Science and Engineering 9, 225236.Google Scholar
Faimali, M., Garaventa, F., Terlizzi, A., Chiantore, M. and Catteneo-Vietti, R. (2004) The interplay of substrate nature and biofilm formation in regulating Balanus amphitrite Darwin, 1854 larval settlement. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 306, 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. and Hartnoll, R.G. (1982) Settlement patterns of Semibalanus balanoides (L.) in the Isle of Man (1977–1981). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 62, 271283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, R.J. and Hawkins, S.J. (2006) Effect of rock type on the recruitment and early mortality of the barnacle Chthamalus montagui. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 334, 96108.Google Scholar
Holmes, S.P., Sturgess, C.J. and Davies, M.S. (1997) The effect of rock-type on the settlement of Balanus balanoides (L.) cyprids. Biofouling 11, 137147.Google Scholar
James, R.L. and Underwood, A.J. (1994) Influence of colour of substratum on recruitment of spirorbid tubeworms to different types of intertidal boulders. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 181, 105115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, C.J. (2002) New settlers and recruits do not enhance settlement of a gregarious intertidal barnacle in New South Wales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 275, 131146.Google Scholar
Keough, M.J. (1998) Response of settling invertebrate larvae to the presence of established recruits. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 231, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, K.D. (1943) Sessile marine invertebrates at Beaufort, N.C. Ecological Monographs 13, 321374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandakumar, K. (1998) Estimating biofouling potential of a candidate site. In Subramoniam, T. (ed.) Methods and techniques in marine biotechnology. Chennai: University of Madras Publications, India, pp. 1820.Google Scholar
O'Connor, N.J. and Richardson, D.L. (1996) Effects of bacterial films on attachment of barnacle (Balanus improvisus Darwin) larvae: laboratory and field studies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 206, 6981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, L.M., Palma, A.T., Prieto, C.C., Sepulveda, P., Valdivia, I. and Ojeda, F.P. (2007) Processes regulating early post-settlement habitat use in a subtidal assemblage of brachyuran decapods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 344, 1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlik, J.R. (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 30, 273335.Google Scholar
Pineda, J. (1994) Spatial and temporal patterns in barnacle settlement rate along a southern California rocky shore. Marine Ecology Progress Series 107, 125138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, B., Hamilton, M.A., McFeters, G.A., Stewart, P.S., Willse, A. and Zelver, N. (1998) Color measurement as a means of quantifying surface biofouling. Journal of Microbial Methods 34, 143149.Google Scholar
Raimondi, P.T. (1988) Rock type affects settlement, recruitment, and zonation of the barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma Pilsbury. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 123, 253267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittschof, D., Forward, R.B., Cannon, G., Welch, J.M., McClary, M., Holm, E.R., Clare, A.S., Conova, S., McKelvey, L.M., Bryan, P. and Van Dover, C.L. (1998) Cues and context: larval responses to physical and chemical cues. Biofouling 12, 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saucedo, P.E., Bervera-Leon, H., Monteforte-Sanchez, M., Southgate, P.C. and Monsalvo-Spencer, P. (2005) Factors influencing recruitment of hatchery reared pearl oyster (Pinctada mazatlanica; Hanley 1856) spat. Journal of Shellfish Research 24, 215219.Google Scholar
Shanks, A.L. (1983) Surface slicks associated with tidally forced internal waves may transport pelagic larvae of benthic invertebrates and fishes shoreward. Marine Ecology Progress Series 13, 311315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Z., Huang, L., Yan, Y. and Li, H. (2007) The effect of different substrates on pearl oyster Pinctada martensii (Dunker) larvae settlement. Aquaculture 271, 377383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, G., Herpe, S., Ralston, E. and Tribou, M. (2006) Short-term testing of antifouling surfaces: the importance of colour. Biofouling 22, 425429.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.J., Southgate, P.C. and Rose, R.A. (1998) Assessment of artificial substrates for collection of hatchery-reared silver-lip pearl oyster (Pinctada maxima, Jameson) spat. Aquaculture 162, 219230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, J.P. (1928) Reaction of the cyprid larvae of barnacles at the time of attachment. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 54, 327335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, J.P. and Luce, R.H. (1928) Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles to light, with special reference to spectral colors. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 54, 336350.Google Scholar
Yule, A.B. and Walker, G. (1984) The temporary adhesion of barnacle cyprids—effects of some differing surface characteristics. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 64, 429439.Google Scholar