Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:38:20.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In situ swimming characteristics of the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus, on German Bank, Gulf of Maine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2014

Gwyn E. Mason ,
Jessica A. Sameoto  and
Anna Metaxas
Gwyn E. Mason*
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, PO Box 15000 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2
Jessica A. Sameoto
Affiliation:
Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 1 Challenger Drive, PO Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada B2Y 4A2
Anna Metaxas
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, PO Box 15000 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G.E. Mason, Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, PO Box 15000 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2 email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Size distribution and swimming activity of the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus, were measured in situ from high-definition video recordings collected by a remotely operated vehicle on a fished scallop bed on German Bank, Gulf of Maine in August 2010. Scallop densities ranged from 0.004 to 3.89 m−2 and shell height (SH) ranged from 16.3 to 193.8 mm. The size distribution was bimodal, with high abundance from 20 to 40 mm SH indicating a recent recruitment event in the area. The low abundance of scallops >100 mm SH was likely due to the active fishery in this area. Of 535 observed swims, 200 were characterized for swim distance, time, velocity and distance travelled per adduction. The size of scallops observed to swim ranged from 18.9 to 99.9 mm SH. Both swim time and swim distance increased linearly with SH, and quadratic relationships were observed between velocity and SH, and between distance travelled per adduction and SH. Swimming velocities peaked at ~ 50 cm s−1 for scallops between 60 and 80 mm, and maximum velocity was 103.2 cm s−1observed for an individual of 64.0 mm SH. Our study provided a unique opportunity to investigate size distribution and associated swimming activity of scallops in their natural habitat, rather than in a simulated study in the laboratory, and at depths not reachable by SCUBA diving.

Keywords

Placopecten magellanicusscallopin situ swimmingGerman Bankremotely operated vehiclesize distributionscallop swimming
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 94 , Issue 5 , August 2014 , pp. 1019 - 1026
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansell, A.D., Cattaneo-Vietti, R. and Chiantore, M. (1998) Swimming in the Antarctic scallop, Adamussium colbecki: analysis of in-situ video recordings. Antarctic Science 10, 369–375.Google Scholar
Bailey, D.M., Johnston, I.A. and Peck, L.S. (2005) Invertebrate muscle performance at high latitude: swimming activity in the Antarctic scallop, Adamussium colbecki. Polar Biology 28, 464–469.Google Scholar
Bourne, N. (1964) Scallops and the offshore fishery of the Maritimes. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 145, 1–61.Google Scholar
Brand, A.R. (2006) Scallop ecology: distributions and behaviour. In Shumway, S. E. (ed.) Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture. 2nd editionAmsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 651–744.Google Scholar
Brown, C.J., Sameoto, J.A. and Smith, S.J. (2012). Multiple methods, maps and management applications: purpose made seafloor maps in support of ocean management. Journal of Sea Research 72, 1–13.Google Scholar
Buddenbrock, W.V. (1911) Untersuchungenüber die schwimmbewegungen und die statocysten der gattung Pecten. Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie derWissenschaften 28, 1–24.Google Scholar
Caddy, J.F. (1968) Underwater observations on scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) behaviour and drag efficiency. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25, 2123–2141.Google Scholar
Caddy, J.F. (1972) Progressive loss of byssus attachment with size in the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 9, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsen, A.E., Hatcher, B.G. and Scheibling, R.E. (1996) Effect of flow velocity and body size on swimming trajectories of sea scallops, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin): a comparison of laboratory and field measurements. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 203, 223–243.Google Scholar
Chapman, C.J., Main, J., Howell, T. and Sangster, G.I. (1979) The swimming speed and endurance of the queen scallop, Chlamys opercularis in relation to trawling. Progress in Underwater Science 4, 57–72.Google Scholar
Cheng, J.Y. and DeMont, M.E. (1996) Jet-propelled swimming in scallops: swimming mechanics and ontogenetic scaling. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 1734–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culliney, J.L. (1974) Larval development of the giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 147, 321–332.Google Scholar
Dadswell, M.J. and Weihs, D. (1990) Size-related hydrodynamic characteristics of the giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Bivalvia: Pectinidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 778–785.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1971) Muscular mechanics and the ontogeny of swimming in scallops. Palaeontology 14, 61–94.Google Scholar
Hannah, C.G., Shore, J.A., Loder, J.W. and Naimie, C.E. (2001) Seasonal circulation on the western and central Scotian Shelf. Journal of Physical Oceanography 31, 591–615.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G. (1967) An investigation of the movement of the scallop Pecten maximus. Helgoländ Marine Research 15, 523–533.Google Scholar
Hebert, D., Pettipas, R., Petrie, B. and Brickman, D. (2012) Meteorological, sea ice and physical oceanographic conditions on the Scotian Shelf and in the Gulf of Maine during 2011. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2012/055.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S.R. and Brand, A.R. (2001) The effect of dredge capture on the escape response of the great scallop, Pecten maximus (L.): implications for the survival of undersized discards. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 266, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joll, L.M. (1989) Swimming behaviour of the saucer scallop Amusium balloti (Mollusca: Pectinidae). Marine Biology 102, 299–305.Google Scholar
Kostylev, V.E., Courtney, R.C., Robert, G. and Todd, B.J. (2003) Stock evaluation of giant scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) using high-resolution acoustics for seabed mapping. Fisheries Research 60, 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, R.W. and Robinson, W.E. (1990) Faunal associations on scallop grounds in the western Gulf of Maine. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 144, 157–171.Google Scholar
Larsen, P.D. and Lee, R.M. (1978) Observations on the abundance, distribution and growth of post-larval sea scallops Placopecten magellanicus, on Georges Bank. Nautilus 92, 112–116.Google Scholar
Manuel, J.L. and Dadswell, M.J. (1991) Swimming behaviour of juvenile giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus in relation to size and temperature. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69, 2250–2254.Google Scholar
Manuel, J.L. and Dadswell, M.J. (1993) Swimming of juvenile sea scallops, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin): a minimum size for effective swimming? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 174, 137–175.Google Scholar
Moore, J.D. and Trueman, E.R. (1971) Swimming of the scallop, Chlamys opercularis (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 6, 179–185.Google Scholar
Parsons, G.J., Warren-Perry, C.R. and Dadswell, M.J. (1992) Movements of juvenile scallops Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin, 1791) in Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick. Journal of Shellfish Research 11, 295–297.Google Scholar
Petrie, B., Drinkwater, K., Gregory, D., Pettipas, R. and Sandstrom, A. (1996) Temperature and salinity atlas for the Scotian Shelf and the Gulf of Maine. Canadian Technical Report of Hydrography and Ocean Sciences. no. 171.Google Scholar
Posgay, J.A. (1957) The range of the sea scallop. Nautilus 71, 55–57.Google Scholar
Robert, G. (1997) German Bank scallop. DFO Science Stock Status Report. C3–20.Google Scholar
Sameoto, J.A., Lawton, P. and Strong, M.B. (2008) An approach to the development of a relational database and GIS applicable scheme for the analysis of video-based surveys of benthic habitats. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, no. 2818.Google Scholar
Scheibling, R.E., Hatcher, B.G., Taylor, L. and Barbeau, M.A. (1995) Experimental seeding trial of the giant scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) in Nova Scotia. In Lubet, P., Barret, J. and Dao, J-C. (eds) Fisheries, Biology and Aquaculture of Pectinids. 8th International Pectinid Workshop, Cherbourg, France, 22–29 May, 1991. IFREMER no. 17, Actes de Colloques, pp. 123–129.Google Scholar
Shumway, S.E. and Parsons, G.J. (2006) Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture. 2nd editionAmsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stephens, P.J. (1978) The sensitivity and control of the scallop mantle edge. Journal of Experimental Biology 75, 203–221.Google Scholar
Stokesbury, K.D.E. (2002) Estimation of sea scallop abundance in closed areas of George's Bank, USA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131, 1081–1092.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokesbury, K.D.E. and Himmelman, J.H. (1993) Spatial distribution of the giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus in unharvested beds in the Baie des Chaleurs, Québec. Marine Ecology Progress Series 96, 159–168.Google Scholar
Stokesbury, K.D.E. and Himmelman, J.H. (1995) Biological and physical variables associated with aggregations of the giant scallop, Placopecten magellanicus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52, 743–753.Google Scholar
Stokesbury, K.D.E. and Himmelman, J.H. (1996) Experimental examination of movement of the giant scallop, Placopecten magellanicus. Marine Biology 124, 651–660.Google Scholar
Squires, H.T. (1962) Giant scallops in Newfoundland coastal waters. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, no. 135.Google Scholar
Thouzeau, G., Robert, G. and Smith, S.J. (1991) Spatial variability in distribution and growth of juvenile and adult sea scallops Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin) on eastern Georges Bank (Northwest Atlantic). Marine Ecology Progress Series 74, 205–218.Google Scholar
Todd, B.J. and Kostylev, V.E. (2011) Surficial geology and benthic habitat of the German Bank seabed, Scotian Shelf, Canada. Continental Shelf Research 31, 554–568.Google Scholar
Tremblay, I., Guderley, H.E. and Fréchette, M. (2006) Swimming performance, metabolic rates and their correlates in the Iceland scallop Chlamys islandica. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 79, 1046–1057.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (2005) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valentine, P.C., Todd, B.J. and Kostylev, V.E. (2005) Classification of marine sublittoral habitats, with application to the Northeastern North America Region. American Fisheries Society Symposium 41, 183–200.Google Scholar
Wentworth, C.K. (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology 30, 377–392.Google Scholar
Wilkens, L.A. (2006) Neurobiology and behaviour of the scallop. In Shumway, S.E. and Parsons, G.J. (eds) Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture. 2nd editionAmsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 317–356.Google Scholar
Winter, M.A. and Hamilton, P.V. (1985) Factors influencing swimming in bay scallops, Argopecten irradians (Lamark, 1819). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 88, 227–242.Google Scholar
Yonge, C.M. (1936) The evolution of the swimming habit in the Lamellibranchia. Mémoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle 2, 77–100.Google Scholar