Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:39:36.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of a Gyrodinium aureolum bloom on inshore young fish populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. W. Potts  and
J. M. Edwards
G. W. Potts
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB
J. M. Edwards
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Blooms of the dinoflagellate, Gyrodinium aureolum have been recorded on the coasts of Europe and are fully reviewed by Tangen (1977) and Boalch (1979). The significance of these blooms is considerable, and with the increase in the eutrophication of inshore waters they are now an important factor influencing the ecology of coastal waters (Boalch, 1984). Their numbers increase to concentrations in excess of five million cells per litre during warm, stable conditions resulting in the waters becoming a greenish-brown colour, ‘slimy’ and with a characteristic smell (Boalch, 1979; Jenkinson, 1986). At these concentrations there are reports that local fauna may be adversely affected and certain species will die.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , May 1987 , pp. 293 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boalch, G. T., 1979. The dinoflagellate bloom on the coast of south-west England, August-September 1978. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 515–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boalch, G. T., 1984. Algal blooms and their effects on fishing in the English Channel. Hydrobiologia, 116/117, 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A. B., Dennis, R. & Potts, G. W., 1979. Mortality associated with a phytoplankton bloom off Penzance in Mounts Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 520–521.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, I. R., 1986. Oceanographic implications of non-newtonian properties found in phytoplankton cultures. Nature, London, 323, 435–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, I. R. & Connors, P. P., 1980. The occurrence of the red-tide organism, Gyrodinium aureolum Hulburt (Dinophyceae), around the south and west of Ireland in August and September 1979. Journal of Sherkin Island, 1, 127–146.Google Scholar
Pingree, R. D., Pugh, P. R.Holligan, P. M. & Forster, G. R., 1975. Summer phytoplankton blooms and red tides along tidal fronts in the approaches to the English Channel. Nature, London, 258, 672–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, G. W. & Mcguigan, K. M., 1986. A preliminary survey of the distribution of post-larval fish associated with inshore reefs and with special reference to Gobiusculus flavescens (Fabricius). Progress in Underwater Science, 11, 15–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. J., Bullock, A. M., Turner, M., Jones, K. S. & Tett, P., 1983. Mortalities of Salmo gairdneri exposed to cultures of Gyrodinium aureolum. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 741–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangen, K., 1977. Blooms of Gyrodinium aureolum (Dinophyceae) in north European waters accompanied by mortality in marine organisms. Sarsia, 63, 123—133.Google Scholar
Tangen, K., 1983. Shellfish poisoning and the occurrence of potentially toxic dinoflagellates in Norwegian waters. Sarsia, 68, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. F., Bullock, A. M., Tett, P. & Roberts, R. J., 1984. Toxicity of Gyrodinium aureolum: some initial findings. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM. Papers and Reports), D: 11, 13 pp. [Mimeo.]Google Scholar