Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:58:17.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunological in situ determination of Pecten maximus larvae and their temporal distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2003

Alain Paugam ,
Marcel Le Pennec ,
Alain Marhic  and
Geneviève André-Fontaine
Alain Paugam
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6539, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280- Plouzané, France
Marcel Le Pennec*
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6539, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280- Plouzané, France
Alain Marhic
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6539, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280- Plouzané, France
Geneviève André-Fontaine
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6539, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, 29280- Plouzané, France
*
‡Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An immunological technique has been developed, which discriminates the Pecten maximus larvae among all other species present in different plankton samples from Brest Bay. This tool was used on each plankton sample to target the temporal distribution of the larvae between summer 1997 and summer 1998. The least abundant period for larvae from April to July 1998, was confirmed and also identified P. maximus which would have been very difficult to recognize with only the help of the analysis of prodissoconch shape. Multi micro-cohort larvae principally from April to July 1998 corresponded probably with as many spawning events.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 83 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 1083 - 1093
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, A.D., Dao, J.C. & Mason, J., 1991. Three European scallops: Pecten maximus, Chlamys (Aequipecten) opercularis and C. (Chlamys) varia. In Development in aquaculture and fisheries science. 21. Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture (ed. S.E. Shumway), pp. 853–859. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Boucher, J. & Dao, J.C., 1990. Recrutement et forcage du recrutement de la coquille Saint-Jacques (Pecten maximus). In L'homme et les ressources halieutiques (ed. J.P. Troadec), pp. 313–354. Plouzane, France: IFREMER.Google Scholar
Boucher, J. & Fifas, S., 1995. Dynamique de la population de coquilles St-Jacques (Pecten maximus) de la rade de Brest, hier etait-il different d'aujourd'hui? Actes de colloques, 3e'mes Rencontres Scientifiques Internationales, Programme Rade, Contrat de baie, 2, 2–12. [Communaute Urbaine de Brest.]Google Scholar
Claxton, T.W. & Boulding, E.G., 1998. A new molecular technique to identify collection of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and Quagga mussel (Dreisseina bugensis) veligers applied to Eastern Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and Lake Simcoe. Canadian Journal ofZoology, 76, 194–198.Google Scholar
Chanley, P.E. & Andrews, J.D., 1971. Aids for identification of bivalve larvae of Virginia. Malacologia, 11, 45–119.Google Scholar
Chauvaud, L., 1998. La coquille Saint-Jacques en Rade de Brest: un mode'le biologique d'etude des reponses de lafaune benthique aux fluc-tuations de l’environnement. PhD thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Comtet, T., 1998. Structure des populations, reproduction, croissance et phyloge'ographie des Mytilidae des champs hydrothermaux Lucky Strike et Menez Gwen (378 17°N et 378 50°N sur la dorsale me'dio-atlantique). PhD thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Conan, G. & Shafee, M.S., 1978. Growth and biannual recruit-ment of the black scallop Chlamys varia (L.) in Lanveoc area, Bay of Brest. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 35, 59–71.Google Scholar
Cragg, S.M., 1980. Swimming behaviour of the larvae of Pecten maximus (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 551–564.Google Scholar
Cragg, S.M. & Crisp, D.J., 1991. The biology of scallop larvae. In Development in aquaculture and fisheries science. 21. Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture (ed. S.E. Shumway), pp. 75–132. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Culliney, J.L., 1974. Larval development of giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 147, 321–322.Google ScholarPubMed
Delmas, R., 1981. Etude de Revolution saisonnie're des sels nutritifs dans la rade de Brest en fonction des apports fluviaux et des e'changes avec l'Iroise. PhD thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Demers, A., Lagadeuc, Y., Dodson, J.J. & Lemieux, R., 1993. Immunofluorescence identification of early life history stages of scallops. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 97, 83–89.Google Scholar
Dickie, L.M., 1955. Fluctuation in abundance of the giant scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin) in the Digby area of the Bay of Fundy. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 12, 797–857.Google Scholar
Dwiono, S., 1992. La metamorphose chez Pecten maximus (L.) (Mollusque Bivalve). PhD thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Faure, L., 1966. Etude des stocks de coquille Saint-Jacques de Bretagne en 1966. Sciences et Pêche, Bulletin de l’Institut des Pêches Maritimes, 153, 1–12.Google Scholar
Hare, M.P., Palumbi, S.R. & Butman, C.A., 2000. Single-step species identification of bivalve larvae using multiplex poly-merase chain reaction. Marine Biology, 137, 953–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Pennec, M., 1978. Gene'se de la coquille larvaire etpost-larvaire chez divers bivalves marins. The'se de Doctorat d'Etat, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Le Pennec, M., Paugam, A. & Le Pennec, G., 2002. The pelagic life of the pectinid Pecten maximus, a review. ICES Journal of Marine Science, in press.Google Scholar
Lucas, A., Chebab-Chalabi, L. & Aldana-Aranda, D., 1986. Passage de l'endotrophie ä l'exotrophie chez les larves de Mytilus edulis. Oceanologica Acta, 9, 191–196.Google Scholar
Masso Rojas, J.A., 1995. Pesqueria de almejas catarina. In Estudio del Potential Pesqueroy Acu|'cola de Baja California Sur (ed. M. Cosas Valdes and G. Ponce Diaz), pp. 71–85. Mexico: SEMARNAP.Google Scholar
Metaxas, A., 2001. Behaviour in flow: perspective on the distri-bution and dispersion of meroplanktonic larvae in the water column. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 86–98.Google Scholar
Nicolas, L., 1999. Etude sur la metamorphose et le developpement post-larvaire de la coquille St-Jacques, Pecten maximus, en ecloserie. PhD thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Patwary, M.U., Kenchington, E.L., Bird, C.J. & Zouros, E., 1994. The use of the random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in genetic studies of the sea scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin, 1791). Journal of Shellfish Research, 13, 547–553.Google Scholar
Paugam, A., Le Pennec, M. & Andre-Fontaine, G., 2000. Immunological recognition of marine bivalve larvae from plankton. Journal of Shellfish Research, 19, 325–331.Google Scholar
Paulet, Y.M., Bekhadra, F., Devauchelle, N., Donval, A. & Dorange, G., 1997. Cycles saisonniers, reproduction et qualite des ovocytes chez Pecten maximus en rade de Brest. Annales de l’Institut Oce'anographique, Paris, 73, 101–112.Google Scholar
Priol, E., 1930. La coquille Saint-Jacques (Pecten maximus). Resume de nos connaissances pratiques sur ce mollusque. Revue des Travaux de VOffi.ce des Pêches Maritimes, III, 143–173.Google Scholar
Raby, D., Lagadeuc, Y., Dodson, J.J. & Mingelbier, M., 1994. Relationship between feeding and vertical distribution of bivalve larvae in stratified and mixed waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 103, 275–284.Google Scholar
Rees, C.B., 1950. The identification and classification of lamelli-branch larvae. Hull Bulletins of Marine Ecology, 3, 73–104.Google Scholar
Salau«n, M., 1994. La larve de Pecten maximus, gene'se et nutrition. PhD thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Salau«n, M., Boucher, J. & Le Pennec, M., 1991. Prodissoconch shell characteristic as indicators of larval growth and viability in Pecten maximus (Linnaeus, 1758). Journal of Shellfish Research, 1, 37–46.Google Scholar
Salomon, J.C., Breton, M. & Lazure, P., 1995. Un mode'le tridi-mensionnel de la rade de Brest: outil de recherche et de gestion. Acte de colloque, 3e'mes rencontres scientifiques internationales, Programme Rade, Contrat de baie, 1, 218–232. [Communaute Urbaine de Brest.]Google Scholar
Smayda, T., 1992. Global epidemic of noxious phytoplankton blooms and food chain consequences in large ecosystems. In Food chains, yields, models and management of large marine ecosystems (ed. K. Sherman et al.), pp. 275–307. Boulder Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Thouzeau, G., 1989. Determimsme du pre-recrutement de Pecten maximus L. en baie de Saint-Brieuc. PhD thesis, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Tremblay, M.J., Meade, L.D. & Hurley G.V, 1987. Identification of planktonic sea scallop larvae (Placopecten magellanicus) (Gmelin). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44, 1361–1366.Google Scholar